An approach to design long-term monitoring and evaluation frameworks in multi-actor systems—A case in water management

Evaluation and Program Planning - Tập 35 - Trang 427-438 - 2012
Leon M. Hermans1, Arienne C. Naber1, Bert Enserink1
1Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, P.O. Box 5015, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baur, 2010, Dealing with distrust and power dynamics: Asymmetric relations among stakeholders in responsive evaluation, Evaluation, 16, 233, 10.1177/1356389010370251 Bots, 2009 Bots, 1999, Designing a power tool for policy analysts: Dynamic Actor Network Analysis Bryson, 2011, Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit, Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001 Bussmann, 2010, Evaluation of legislation: Skating on thin ice, Evaluation, 16, 279, 10.1177/1356389010370252 1992 Cundill, 2009, Monitoring in adaptive co-management: Toward a learning based approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3205, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.012 Dewar, 2002 Dewar, J. A., Builder, C. H., Hix, W. M., & Levin, M. H. (1993). Assumption-based planning. A planning tool for very uncertain times. RAND Report MR-114-A. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Eden, 1989, Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA) Eden, 2004, Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector, European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 615, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00061-4 Enserink, 2010 Friedman, 2001, Designed blindness. An action science perspective on program theory evaluation, American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 161, 10.1177/109821400102200203 Guba, 1989 Gysen, 2006, The modus narrandi: A methodology for evaluating effects of environmental policy, Evaluation, 12, 95, 10.1177/1356389006064176 Hermans, 2009, Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts, European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 808, 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.040 Jenkins, M. (1994). A methodology for creating and comparing strategic causal maps. Cranfield School of Management Working Paper Series, SWP 2/94. Cranfield: Cranfield University. Leeuw, 2003, Reconstructing program theories: Methods available and problems to be solved, American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 5, 10.1177/109821400302400102 Leeuw, 2009 Levine, 2006, The evaluation agenda, 183 Lindblom, 1990 Majone, 1989 Margoluis, 2009, Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation, Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 138, 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.007 Mason, 1981 Parkinson, 2009, Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation, Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 229, 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.03.003 Pawson, 2006 Pawson, 1997 Sabatier, 1988, An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein, Policy Sciences, 21, 129, 10.1007/BF00136406 Schön, 1994 Swanson, 2010, Seven tools for creating adaptive policies, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77, 924, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.005 Toulmin, 1958 Van der Meer, 2006, Evaluation of multi-actor policy processes: Accountability, learning and cooperation, Evaluation, 12, 201, 10.1177/1356389006066972 Van Eeten, 1999 Vedung, 2010, Four waves of evaluation diffusion, Evaluation, 16, 263, 10.1177/1356389010372452 Walker, 2001, Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policymaking, European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 282, 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00071-0