An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of arsenic mitigation technologies: Implications for public policy

Ahmad, 2005, Value of arsenic-free drinking water to rural households in Bangladesh, J. Environ. Manage., 74, 173, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.011 Ahmed, 2003 Berbel, 2011, A cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving measures for the water framework directive: the case of the Guadalquivir River Basin in Southern Spain, Water Resour. Manage., 25, 623, 10.1007/s11269-010-9717-6 BIS 2012. Indian Standard Drinking Water — Specification (Second Revision): IS 10500: 2012. New Delhi, India, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002, India. Blanco-Gutiérrez, 2011, Cost-effectiveness of groundwater conservation measures: A multi-level analysis with policy implications, Agric. Water Manage., 98, 639, 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.013 Brouns, 2013 Bundschuh, 2010, Emerging mitigation needs and sustainable options for solving the arsenic problems of rural and isolated urban areas in Latin America–A critical analysis, Water Res., 44, 5828, 10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.001 Cellini, 2010, Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis, Handbook Practical Prog. Eval., 3, 493 CGWB and NIH (2010). Mitigation and remedy of groundwater Arsenic Menace in India: A Vision Document. India, National Institute of Hydrology (NIH), Roorky and Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Government of India. Chakraborti, 2003, Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger?, Environ. Health Perspect., 111, 1194, 10.1289/ehp.5966 Chakraborti, 2016, Arsenic contamination of groundwater and its induced health effects in Shahpur block, Bhojpur district, Bihar state, India: risk evaluation, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 9492, 10.1007/s11356-016-6149-8 Chakraborti, 2016, Arsenic groundwater contamination and its health effects in Patna district (capital of Bihar) in the middle Ganga plain, India, Chemosphere, 152, 520, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.119 Chakraborti, 2017, Groundwater arsenic contamination and its health effects in India, Hydrogeol. J., 1 Curry, 2000 Das, 2009, Groundwater arsenic contamination, its health effects and approach for mitigation in West Bengal, India and Bangladesh, Water Qual. Exposure Health, 1, 5, 10.1007/s12403-008-0002-3 Edejer, T. T.-T., R. Baltussen, T. Adam, R. Hutubessy, A. Acharya, D. Evans and C. Murray (2002). “WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.” Freeman, 2000, Economics, incentives, and environmental regulation, Environ. Policy, 6, 193 Ghosh, 2009, Arsenic hot spots detected in the State of Bihar (India) a serious health hazard for estimated human population of 5.5 Lakhs, 62 Gorr, W. L. and K. S. Kurland (2015). GIS Tutorial 1: Basic Workbook Supplement for ArcGIS 10.3, ESRI. Hossain, 2005, Ineffectiveness and poor reliability of arsenic removal plants in West Bengal, India, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4300, 10.1021/es048703u Islam, 2010, Rainwater: A potential alternative source for scarce safe drinking and arsenic contaminated water in Bangladesh, Water Resour. Manage., 24, 3987, 10.1007/s11269-010-9643-7 IWA. (2016). “Executive Summary of Arsenic Contamination in the World.” Retrieved June 28, 2016, 2016, from http://www.iwawaterwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Articles/ExecutiveSummaryofArsenicContaminationintheWorld. Kabir, 2007, Sustainability of arsenic mitigation in Bangladesh: results of a functionality survey, Int. J. Environ. Health Res., 17, 207, 10.1080/09603120701254904 Kalbar, 2012, Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach, J. Environ. Manag., 113, 158, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025 Lee, 2002, Fundamentals of life-cycle cost analysis, Transport. Res. Rec., 1812, 203, 10.3141/1812-25 Lescot, 2013, A spatially-distributed cost-effectiveness analysis framework for controlling water pollution, Environ. Model. Soft., 41, 107, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.008 Litman, T. (2015). Evaluating public transit benefits and costs, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Mazumder, D. G. (2000). “Diagnosis and treatment of chronic arsenic poisoning.” United Nations synthesis report on arsenic in drinking water. Milton, 2007, A randomised intervention trial to assess two arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A, 42, 1897, 10.1080/10934520701567197 Mosler, 2010, Personal, social, and situational factors influencing the consumption of drinking water from arsenic-safe deep tubewells in Bangladesh, J. Environ. Manage., 91, 1316, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.012 Nas, 1996 Nickson, 2007, Current knowledge on the distribution of arsenic in groundwater in five states of India, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A, 42, 1707, 10.1080/10934520701564194 Ravenscroft, 2009 Roy, 2008, Economic benefits of arsenic removal from ground water—A case study from West Bengal, India, Sci. Total Environ., 397, 1, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.007 Saha, 2009, Arsenic groundwater contamination in parts of middle Ganga plain, Bihar, Curr. Sci., 97, 753 Saha, 2016, A decade of investigations on groundwater arsenic contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, India, Environ. Geochem. Health, 38, 315, 10.1007/s10653-015-9730-z Shafiquzzaman, 2009, Technical and social evaluation of arsenic mitigation in rural Bangladesh, J. Health Popul. Nutr., 27, 674, 10.3329/jhpn.v27i5.3779 Shibasaki, 2007, Evaluation of deep groundwater development for arsenic mitigation in western Bangladesh, J. Enviro. Sci. Health Part A, 42, 1919, 10.1080/10934520701567213 Shil, 2009, Cost-effectiveness analysis for an arsenic water supply project in Bangladesh, Int. J. Bus. Manage., 3, 175, 10.5539/ijbm.v3n11p175 Singh, 2011 Singh, S. K. (2015a). Assessing and mapping vulnerability and risk perceptions to groundwater arsenic contamination: Towards developing sustainable arsenic mitigation models (Order No. 3701365). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (1681668682). Ph.D. Dissertation/Thesis, Montclair State University. Singh, 2015, Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in the Middle-Gangetic Plain, Bihar (India): The Danger Arrived, Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 4, 70 Singh, 2017, Conceptual framework of a cloud-based decision support system for arsenic health risk assessment, Environ. Syst. Decis., 37, 435 Singh, 2014, Groundwater Arsenic Contamination and Associated Health Risks in Bihar, India, Int. J. Environ. Res., 8, 49 Singh, 2016, Evaluating hydrogeological and topographic controls on groundwater arsenic contamination in the mid-Gangetic Plain in India: Towards Developing Sustainable Arsenic Mitigation Models, 263 Singh, 2011, Entry of arsenic into food material–a case study, World Appl. Sci. J., 13, 385 Singh, 2012, Health Risk Assessment due to Groundwater Arsenic Contamination: Children are at High Risk, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 18, 751, 10.1080/10807039.2012.688700 Singh, 2014, Multiple Groundwater Contamination in the Mid-Gangetic Plain, Bihar (India): A Potential Threat, Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Technol., 3, 175 Singh, 2017, Global Arsenic Contamination: Living with the Poison Nectar, Environ. Sci. Policy Sustainable Dev., 59, 24, 10.1080/00139157.2017.1274583 Singh, 2017, Developing Sustainable Models of Arsenic-Mitigation Technologies in the Middle-Ganga Plain in India, Curr. Sci., 113, 80, 10.18520/cs/v113/i01/80-93 Singh, 2015, Mapping Composite Vulnerability to Groundwater Arsenic Contamination: An Analytical Framework and a Case Study in India, Nat. Hazards, 75, 1883, 10.1007/s11069-014-1402-2 Tengs, 1995, Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness, Risk Anal., 15, 369, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x Tietenberg, 2016 Uneze, 2012, Cost-effectiveness and benefit–cost analyses of some water interventions in Nigeria: the case of Bauchi State, J. Dev. Eff., 4, 497, 10.1080/19439342.2012.716075 USEPA (1999). Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, NCEA-F-0644 (Revised draft). Washington DC. USA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Winkel, 2011, Arsenic pollution of groundwater in Vietnam exacerbated by deep aquifer exploitation for more than a century, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 1246, 10.1073/pnas.1011915108