An analysis of delay in implementing ecological fiscal transfers in Brazil

Acre Acre Blatter, 2012 Borie, 2014, Exploring the contribution of fiscal transfers to protected area policy, Ecol. Soc., 19, 9, 10.5751/ES-05716-190109 Buchanan, 1987, The constitution of economic policy, Am. Econ. Rev., 77 DeLeon, 1978, Public policy termination: an end and a beginning, Pol. Anal., 4, 369 Dixit, 1996 Dixit, 2003, Some lessons from transaction-cost politics for less-developed countries, Econ. Polit., 15, 107, 10.1111/1468-0343.00118 Droste, 2015, Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Brazil - incentivizing or compensating conservation ?, 30 Droste, 2017, Decentralization effects in ecological fiscal transfers – the case of Portugal Droste, 2017, Decentralization effects in ecological fiscal transfers: a bayesian structural time series analysis for Portugal, Environ. Resour. Econ., 71 Droste, 2017, Municipal responses to ecological fiscal transfers in Brazil: a microeconometric panel data approach, Environ. Pol. Govern., 27, 378, 10.1002/eet.1760 Droste, 2017, Integrating ecological indicators into federal-state fiscal relations: a policy design study for Germany, Environ. Pol. Govern. Epstein, 1999 Gerring, 2004, What is a case study and what is it good for?, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 98, 341, 10.1017/S0003055404001182 Geva-May, 2004, Riding the wave of opportunity: termination in public policy, J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor., 14, 309, 10.1093/jopart/muh020 Grieg-Gran, 2001 Grosso do Sul, 1994 Horn, 1995 King, 1994 Köllner, 2002, Integrating biodiversity into intergovernmental fiscal transfers based on cantonal benchmarking: a Swiss case study, Basic Appl. Ecol., 3, 381, 10.1078/1439-1791-00104 Krutilla, 2011, Transaction costs and environmental policy: an assessment framework and literature review, Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. Levy, 2008, Case studies: types, designs, and logics of inference, Conflict Manag. Peace Sci., 25, 1, 10.1080/07388940701860318 Loureiro, 2002 Moura, 2015, Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços Socioambiental: incentivos institucionais e legislação ambiental no Brasil, Rev. Adm. Pública, 49, 165, 10.1590/0034-76121677 North, 1990 North, 1993, Economic performance through time, Prize Lecture - Lect.e Memory Alfred Nobel, 84, 9p Paraíba Paulo, 2017, Understanding policy adoption in Brazil: the diffusion of the ecological fiscal transfer across the states, 1990-2011 Paulo, 2019, Ecological fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation policy: a transaction costs analysis of Minas Gerais, Brazil, Ecol. Econ., 166 Paulo, 2019, The adoption of ecological fiscal transfers: an empirical analysis, Land Use Pol. Paulo, 2020, The role of the ecological fiscal transfers for water conservation policies, 61 Paulo, 2017, The role of ecological fiscal transfers for solid waste management in the overall policy mix Pernambuco Pernambuco Piauí Ring, 2008, Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: the case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil, Land Use Pol., 25, 485, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.001 Ring, 2015, Economic instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem governance, 413 Rondônia, 1996 Santos, 2012, Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation: the Portuguese local finances law, Land Use Pol., 29, 261, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.001 Sauquet, 2014, Protected areas, local governments, and strategic interactions: the case of the ICMS-Ecológico in the Brazilian state of Paraná, Ecol. Econ., 107, 249, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.008 Schröter-Schlaack, 2014, Intergovernmental fiscal transfers to support local conservation action in Europe, Z. für Wirtschaftsgeogr., 58, 98, 10.1515/zfw.2014.0007 Silva, 2012, Avaliação dos Impactos do ICMS Socioambiental na Criação de Unidades de Conservação e Unidades de Tratamento de Resíduos Sólidos em Pernambuco : Uma Análise a partir do Método de Diferenças-em-Diferenças, Revista de Economia do Nordeste, 44 Spiller, 2003, The institutional foundations of public policy: a transactions approach with application to Argentina, J. Law Econ. Organ., 19, 281, 10.1093/jleo/ewg012