An Epistemic Interpretation of Quantum Probability via Contextuality
Tóm tắt
According to a standard view, quantum mechanics (QM) is a contextual theory and quantum probability does not satisfy Kolmogorov’s axioms. We show, by considering the macroscopic contexts associated with measurement procedures and the microscopic contexts (μ-contexts) underlying them, that one can interpret quantum probability as epistemic, despite its non-Kolmogorovian structure. To attain this result we introduce a predicate language L(x), a classical probability measure on it and a family of classical probability measures on sets of μ-contexts, each element of the family corresponding to a (macroscopic) measurement procedure. By using only Kolmogorovian probability measures we can thus define mean conditional probabilities on the set of properties of any quantum system that admit an epistemic interpretation but are not bound to satisfy Kolmogorov’s axioms. The generalized probability measures associated with states in QM can then be seen as special cases of these mean probabilities, which explains how they can be non-classical and provides them with an epistemic interpretation. Moreover, the distinction between compatible and incompatible properties is explained in a natural way, and purely theoretical classical conditional probabilities coexist with empirically testable quantum conditional probabilities.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aerts, D. (1986). A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 27, 202–210.
Aerts, D. (1999). Foundations of quantum physics: A general realistic and operational approach. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38, 289–358.
Aerts, D., & Gabora, L. (2005). A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations II: A Hilbert space representation. Kibernetes, 34, 176–204.
Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014). The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution of the measurement problem. Annalen der Physik, 351, 975–1025.
Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2017). Universal measurements how to free three birds in one move. Singapore: World Scientific.
Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein–Podolski–Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195–200.
Bell, J. S. (1966). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 447–452.
Beltrametti, E., & Cassinelli, G. (1981). The logic of quantum mechanics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Birkhoff, G., & von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 37, 823–843.
Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Busch, P., Lahti, P. J., & Mittelstaedt, P. (1996). The quantum theory of measurement. Berlin: Springer.
Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical foundations of physics. New York: Basic Books Inc.
Dalla Chiara, M. L., Giuntini, R., & Greechie, R. (2004). Reasoning in quantum theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Feyerabend, F. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
Garola, C. (1999). Semantic realism: A new philosophy for quantum physics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38, 3241–3252.
Garola, C., & Persano, M. (2014). Embedding quantum mechanics into a broader noncontextual theory. Foundations of Science, 19, 217–239.
Garola, C., & Pykacz, J. (2004). Locality and measurement within the SR model for an objective interpretation of quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 34, 449–475.
Garola, C., & Sozzo, S. (2010). Realistic aspects in the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. Humana. mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 13, 81–101.
Garola, C., Sozzo, S., & Wu, J. (2016). Outline of a generalization and a reinterpretation of quantum mechanics recovering objectivity. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 55, 2500–2528.
Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Zeilinger, A. (1990). Bell’s theorem without inequalities. American Journal of Physics, 58, 1131–1143.
Hempel, C. C. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.
Kochen, S., & Specker, E. P. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59–87.
Khrennikov, A. (2009a). Contextual approach to quantum formalism. New York: Springer.
Khrennikov, A. (2009b). Interpretations of probability. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ludwig, G. (1983). Foundations of quantum mechanics I. New York: Springer.
Mermin, N. D. (1993). Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 803–815.
Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of quantum physics. Reading, MA: Benjamin.