An Efficient Approach for Coordination of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management
Tóm tắt
In this paper, a closed-loop supply chain composed of dual-channel retailers and manufacturers, a dynamic game model under the direct recovery, and an entrusted third-party recycling mode of the manufacturer is constructed. The impact of horizontal fairness concern behavior is introduced on the pricing strategies and utility of decision makers under different recycling models. The equilibrium strategy at fair neutrality is used as a reference to compare offline retails sales. Research shows that in the closed-loop supply chain of dual-channel sales, whether in the case of fair neutrality or horizontal fairness concerns, the manufacturer’s direct recycling model is superior to the entrusted third-party recycling, and the third-party recycling model is transferred by the manufacturer. In the direct recycling model, the horizontal fairness concern of offline retailers makes two retailers in the positive supply chain compete to lower the retail price in order to increase market share. Manufacturers will lower the wholesale price to encourage competition, and the price will be the horizontal fairness concern coefficient, which is negatively correlated. In the reverse supply chain, manufacturers increase the recycling rate of used products. This pricing strategy increases the utility of manufacturers and the entire supply chain system compared to fair neutral conditions, while two retailers receive diminished returns. Manufacturers, as channel managers to encourage retailers to compete for price cuts, can be coordinated through a three-way revenue sharing contract to achieve Pareto optimality.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Govindan, 2018, Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 240, 603, 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012
Babazadeh, 2018, An Adjusted Robust Optimization Method to an Integrated Production-Distribution Planning Problem in Closed-Loop Supply Chains under Uncertainty, Int. J. Inf. Manag. Sci., 29, 1
Bazan, 2017, Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 183, 394, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.009
Lloret, J., Garcia-Sabater, J.P., and Marin-Garcia, J.A. (2009, January 25). Cooperative supply chain re-scheduling: The case of an engine supply chain. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering (CDVE 2009), Luxembourg.
Garcia-Sabater, J.P., Lloret, J., Marin-Garcia, J.A., and Puig-Bernabeu, X. (2010, January 19–22). Coordinating a cooperative automotive manufacturing network–an agent-based model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (CDVE 2010), Calvia, Spain.
Savaskan, 2004, Close-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing, Manag. Sci., 50, 239, 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186
Savaskan, 2006, Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailer, Manag. Sci., 52, 1, 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0454
Ferguson, 2006, The effect of competition on recovery strategies, Prod. Oper. Manag., 15, 351, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00250.x
Webb, 1997, Understanding hybrid channel conflict: A Conceptual model and propositions for research, J. Bus. Bus. Mark., 4, 39, 10.1300/J033v04n01_02
Park, 2003, Modeling hybrid distribution channels: A game-theoretic analysis, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 10, 155, 10.1016/S0969-6989(03)00007-9
Kurata, 2007, Pricing policies under direct vs. indirect channel competition and national vs. store brand competition, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 180, 262, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.002
Tsay, 2004, Channel conflict and coordination in the e-commerce age, Prod. Oper. Manag., 13, 93, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00147.x
Nagurney, 2005, Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 164, 120, 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.11.007
Ma, 2013, Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 226, 221, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.033
Saha, 2016, Dual channel closed-loop supply chain coordination with a reward-driven remanufacturing policy, Int. J. Prod. Res., 54, 1503, 10.1080/00207543.2015.1090031
Zhang, 2015, Retail Services and Pricing Decisions in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Remanufacturing, Sustainability, 7, 2373, 10.3390/su7032373
Dai, D., Si, F., and Wang, J. (2017). Stability and Complexity Analysis of a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Delayed Decision under Government Intervention. Entropy, 19.
Huang, Y., and Wang, Z. (2017). Dual-Recycling Channel Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Cost Disruptions. Sustainability, 9.
Zhou, 2018, Pricing Decisions of a Dual-Channel Supply Chain considering Supply Disruption Risk, Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2018, 6841519, 10.1155/2018/6841519
Liu, Y., Quan, B.T., Li, J., and Forrest, J.Y.L. (2018). A Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Cost Sharing of Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 10.
Li, 2014, Dual-channel supply chain pricing decision with a risk-averse retailer, Int. J. Prod. Res., 52, 7132, 10.1080/00207543.2014.939235
Yi, Y., and Li, J. (2018). Cost-Sharing Contracts for Energy Saving and Emissions Reduction of a Supply Chain under the Conditions of Government Subsidies and a Carbon Tax. Sustainability, 10.
Ho, 2014, Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design, Prod. Oper. Manag., 23, 161, 10.1111/poms.12064
Li, 2018, The Complexity Analysis in Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Fairness Concern and Different Business Objectives, Complexity, 2018, 4752765
Jiang, 2010, Pricing strategy in a dual-channel and remanufacturing supply chain system, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 41, 909, 10.1080/00207720903576506
Huang, 2009, Introduction of a second channel: Implications for pricing and profits, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 194, 258, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.041
Bolton, 2000, ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 166, 10.1257/aer.90.1.166