An Armstrongian defense of dispositional monist accounts of laws of nature
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Armstrong, D. M. (1985). What is a law of nature? Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1989). Universals: An opinionated introduction. Westview Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (2004). How do particulars stand to universals? In D. Zimmerman (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaphysics (pp. 139–153). Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (2012). Defending Categoricalism. In A. Bird, B. D. Ellis, & H. Sankey (Eds.), Properties, powers, and structures: Issues in the metaphysics of realism (pp. 27–33). Routledge.
Barker, S. (2009). Dispositional monism, relational constitution and quiddities. Analysis, 69(2), 242–250.
Barker, S., & Smart, B. (2012). The ultimate argument against dispositional monist accounts of Laws. Analysis, 72(4), 714–722.
Bird, A. (2005). The ultimate argument against Armstrong’s contingent necessitation view of Laws. Analysis, 65(286), 147–155.
Callender, C. (2004a). There is no puzzle about the low entropy past. In C. Hitchcock (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science (pp. 240–255). Blackwell.
Callender, C. (2004b). Measures, explanations and the past: Should ‘special’ initial conditions be explained? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/55.2.195
Derringh, E. (1990). Estimate of the critical mass of a fissionable isotope. American Journal of Physics, 58(4), 363–364. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16172
Hendry, R. F., & Rowbottom, D. P. (2009). Dispositional essentialism and the necessity of Laws. Analysis, 69(4), 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp093
Lewis, D. (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61(4), 343–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408312341131
Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell Publishers.
Loewer, B. (2012). Two accounts of Laws and Time. Philosophical Studies, 160(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9911-x
Price, H. (2004). On the origins of the arrow of time: Why there is still a puzzle about the low-entropy past. In C. Hitchcock (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science (pp. 219–239). Blackwell.
Reed, B. C. (1996). Estimating the critical mass of a fissionable isotope. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed073p162
Sartenaer, O., Guay, A., & Humphreys, P. (2020). What Price changing Laws of nature? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00327-4
Serber, R. (1992). The Los Alamos primer: The first lectures on how to build an atomic bomb. University of California Press.