An Approach to Evaluate Blurriness in Retinal Images with Vitreous Opacity for Cataract Diagnosis

Journal of Healthcare Engineering - Tập 2017 - Trang 1-16 - 2017
Li Xiong1, Huiqi Li1, Liang Xu2
1School of Information and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing 100730, China

Tóm tắt

Cataract is one of the leading causes of blindness in the world’s population. A method to evaluate blurriness for cataract diagnosis in retinal images with vitreous opacity is proposed in this paper. Three types of features are extracted, which include pixel number of visible structures, mean contrast between vessels and background, and local standard deviation. To avoid the wrong detection of vitreous opacity as retinal structures, a morphological method is proposed to detect and remove such lesions from retinal visible structure segmentation. Based on the extracted features, a decision tree is trained to classify retinal images into five grades of blurriness. The proposed approach was tested using 1355 clinical retinal images, and the accuracies of two-class classification and five-grade grading compared with that of manual grading are 92.8% and 81.1%, respectively. The kappa value between automatic grading and manual grading is 0.74 in five-grade grading, in which both variance and P value are less than 0.001. Experimental results show that the grading difference between automatic grading and manual grading is all within 1 grade, which is much improvement compared with that of other available methods. The proposed grading method provides a universal measure of cataract severity and can facilitate the decision of cataract surgery.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1136/bmj.333.7559.128

2000, Community Eye Health, 13, 17

1993, Optometry & Vision Science, 70, 923, 10.1097/00006324-199311000-00009

1986, International Ophthalmology, 9, 207, 10.1007/BF00137534

1983, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 24, 424

1910, Berichte Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft, 36, 75

10.1109/RBME.2010.2084567

10.1080/13651820500373093

10.3892/etm.2012.570

2010, Ophthalmology in China, 19, 1

10.1038/eye.2008.31

10.1016/j.compind.2014.09.005

10.1109/TMI.2004.829331

10.1109/TMI.2003.815900

10.1109/TMI.2007.900326

10.1007/s11517-012-0994-5

10.1109/42.34715

2009, Iranian Journal of Science & Technology Transaction B Engineering, 33, 191

10.1109/83.931095

10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.08.003

10.1016/j.cviu.2011.09.001

10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.07.006

10.1016/j.patcog.2009.12.017

10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.09.005

10.1109/TITB.2011.2176540

10.1109/TBME.2013.2295605

10.1016/j.media.2011.07.004

10.1167/iovs.12-10928

10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.007

2002, Diabetic Medicine, 19, 105, 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00613.x

10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626467

10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01819.x

10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.007

10.1177/0951484814547236

10.1177/001316446002000104

10.1148/radiol.2323030985

10.1007/s00056-004-0402-3

1977, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310