Ambiguity as a motor for communication—Differences between hearing and deaf students’ ways of reasoning about energy

International Journal of Educational Research - Tập 46 - Trang 327-340 - 2007
Bengt-Olov Molander1, Ola Halldén2, Camilla Lindahl1
1Department of Curricular Studies, StockholmInstitute of Education, P.O. Box 34 103, SE-100 26 Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Education, Stockholm University

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aikenhead, 1996, Science education: border crossing into the subculture of science, Studies in Science Education, 27, 1, 10.1080/03057269608560077 Aikenhead, 2000, Renegotiating the culture of school science, 245 Ash, 2004, Reflective scientific sense-making dialogue in two languages: The science in the dialogue and the dialogue in science, Science Education, 88, 855, 10.1002/sce.20002 Bergman, B (1994). Signed languages. In Ahlgren, I., & Hyltenstam, K. (Eds.), Bilingualism in deaf education. international studies on sign language and communication of the deaf, Vol. 27. Hamburg: Signum. Bergman, B., & Nilsson, A.-L. (1999). Teckenspråket, in Hyltenstam, K. (Ed.), Sveriges sju inhemska språk–ett minoritetsperspektiv (pp. 329–351). [Sign language. In Hyltenstam, K, (Ed.), Swedens’ seven domestic languages—a minority perspective] Lund: Studentlitteratur. Bruner, 1966 Caravita, 1994, Re-framing the problem of conceptual change, Learning and Instruction, 4, 89, 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90020-5 Costa, 1995, When science is ‘another world’: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school and science, Science Education, 79, 313, 10.1002/sce.3730790306 Driver, 1981, Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science, European Journal of Science Education, 3, 93, 10.1080/0140528810030109 Gibbons, P. (2001). Learning a new register in a second language. In Candlin, C., & Mercer, N. (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context: A reader (pp. x–x). London: Routledge. Hallden, 1988, Alternative frameworks and the concept of task. Cognitive constraints in pupils’ interpretations of teachers’ assignments, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,, 32, 123, 10.1080/0031383880320303 Lemke, 1993 Molander, 2001, Deaf pupils reasoning about scientific phenomena. Shool science as a framework for understanding or school science as fragments of factual knowledge, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,, 6, 200, 10.1093/deafed/6.3.200 Mortimer, 2003 Ogborn, 1996 Roald, 2002, Norwegian deaf teachers’ reflections on their science education: Implications for instruction, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 57, 10.1093/deafed/7.1.57 Skolverket (1996). Specialskolan. Kursplaner, timplaner, betygskriterier och kommentarer. [The special school. Curricula, schedule, criteria for grading and comments]. Stockholm: Fritzes. Solomon, 1989, The social construction of school science, 123 Solomon, 1992 Solomon, 2003, Home–school learning of science: The culture of homes and pupils’ difficult border-crossing, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 219, 10.1002/tea.10073 Sutton, 1992 Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. (Learning in practice. A sociocultural perspective.) Stockholm: Prisma.