Always and Only: Why Not All Focus-Sensitive Operators Are Alike

Natural Language Semantics - Tập 11 - Trang 323-362 - 2003
David Beaver1, Brady Clark1
1Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA E-mail

Tóm tắt

We discuss focus sensitivity in English, the phenomenon whereby interpretation of some expressions is affected by placement of intonational focus. We concentrate in particular on the interpretation of always and only, both of which are interpreted as universal quantifiers, and both of which are focus sensitive. Using both naturally occurring and constructed data we explore the interaction of these operators with negative polarity items, with presupposition, with prosodically reduced elements, and with syntactic extraction. On the basis of this data we show that while only lexically encodes a dependency on the placement of focus, always does not. Rather, the focus sensitivity of always results from its dependency on context, and from the fact that focus also reflects what is given in the context. We account for this split using an analysis couched in event semantics.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aoun, J. and Y.-H. A. Li: 1993, 'Wh-elements in Situ: Syntax or LF?', Linguistic Inquiry 24(2), 199–238. Atlas, J.: 1993, 'The Importance of Being “Only”: Testing the Neo-Gricean Versus Neo-entailment Paradigms', Journal of Semantics 10, 301–318. Atlas, J.: 1996, '“Only” Noun Phrases, Pseudo-Negative Generalized Quantifiers, Negative Polarity Items, and Monotonicity', Journal of Semantics 13, 265–328. Barbiers, S.: 1995, The Syntax of Interpretation. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague. Bartels, C.: 1997, 'Acoustic Correlates of “Second Occurrence” Focus: Towards an Experimental Investigation', in H. Kamp and B. Partee (eds.), Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning (Proceedings of the Workshops in Prague and Bad Teinach), pp. 11–30. University of Stuttgart. Bayer, J.: 1999, 'Bound Focus, or How Can Association with Focus Be Achieved without Going Semantically Astray', in G. Rebuschi and L. Tuller (eds.), The Grammar of Focus, pp. 55–82. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. Beaver, D.: 1994, 'Accommodating Topics', in R. van der Sandt and P. Bosch (eds.), The Proceedings of the IBM/Journal of Semantics Conference on Focus, Vol. 3, pp. 439–448. IBM Heidelberg. Beaver, D.: 2001, Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford. Beaver, D. and B. Clark: 2002a, 'Monotonicity and Focus Sensitivity', in B. Jackson (ed.), Proceedings from SALT 12, pp. 40–58. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Beaver, D. and B. Clark: 2002b, 'The Proper Treatments of Focus Sensitivity', in L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 21, pp. 15–28. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass. Beaver, D., B. Clark, E. Flemming, and M. Wolters: 2002, 'Second Occurrence Focus Is Prosodically Marked: Results of a Production Experiment', manuscript, Stanford University. Bonomi, A. and P. Casalegno: 1993, 'Only: Association with Focus in Event Semantics', Natural Language Semantics 2, 1–45. Chomsky, N.: 1972, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, Chapt. 'Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation', pp. 62–119. Mouton, The Hague. Cohan, J.: 2000, The Realization and Function of Focus in Spoken English, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Cohen, A.: 1999, 'How Are Alternatives Computed?', Journal of Semantics 16, 43–65. Diesing, M.: 1992, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Dryer, M. S.: 1994, 'The Pragmatics of Association with Only', paper presented at the 1994 Annual Meeting of the LSA, Boston, Mass. von Fintel, K.: 1994, 'Restriction on Quantifier Domains', PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. von Fintel, K.: 1995, 'A Minimal Theory of Adverbial Quantification', in B. Partee and H. Kamp (eds.), Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning: Proceedings of the Workshops in Prague and Bad Teinach, pp. 153–193. University of Stuttgart. von Fintel, K.: 1999, 'NPI Licensing, Strawson-Entailment, and Context Dependency', Journal of Semantics 16, 97–148. Geurts, B. and R. van der Sandt: 1997, 'Presuppositions and Backgrounds', in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 37–42. University of Amsterdam. Haji?ová, E., B. H. Partee, and P. Sgall: 1998, Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content, Kluwer, Dordrecht. Hamblin, C.: 1973, 'Questions in Montague Grammar', Foundations of Language 10, 41–53. Herburger, E.: 2000, What Counts: Focus and Quantification. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Hoeksema, J. and F. Zwarts: 1991, 'Some Remarks on Focus Adverbs', Journal of Semantics 8, 51–70. Horn, L.: 1996, 'Exclusive Company: Only and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference', Journal of Semantics 13, 1–40. Jackson, E.: 1995, 'Weak and Strong Polarity Items: Licensing and Intervention', Linguistic Analysis 25, 181–208. Jacobs, J.: 1983, Fokus und Skalen; Niemeyer, Tübingen. Kadmon, N.: 2001, Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition and Focus. Blackwell, Oxford. Kadmon, N. and F. Landman: 1993, 'Any', Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353–422. Kayne, R.: 1998, 'Overt vs. Covert Movement', Syntax 1(2), 128–191. Krifka, M.: 1989, 'Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution, and Quantification in Event Semantics', in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, pp. 75–115. Foris, Dordrecht. Krifka, M.: 1992a, 'A Framework for Focus-Sensitive Quantification', in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings from SALT 2 (Working Papers in Linguistics 40), pp. 215–236. The Ohio State University, Columbus. Krifka, M.: 1992b, 'A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions', Informationsstruktur und Grammatik (Linguistische Berichte) 4, 17–53. Krifka, M.: 1995, 'The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items', Linguistic Analysis 25, 1–49. Krifka, M.: 1999, 'Additive Particles under Stress', in D. Strolovitch and A. Larson (eds.), Proceedings from SALT 8, pp. 111–128. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Ladd, D. R.: 1996, Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Ladusaw, W.: 1979, 'Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations', PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Linebarger, M. C.: 1987, 'Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation', Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 325–387. McCawley, J. D.: 1993, Everything That Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic But Were Ashamed to Ask (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. McCawley, J. D.: 1998, The Syntactic Phenomena of English (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. de Mey, S.: 1991, '“Only” as a Determiner and as a Generalized Quantifier', Journal of Semantics 8(1-2), 91–106. Nevalainen, T.: 1991, But, Only, Just: Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500-1900. Société Néophilologique, Helsinki. Partee, B.: 1991, 'Topic, Focus, and Quantification', in S. Moore and A. Z. Wyner (eds.), Proceedings from SALT 1, pp. 159–187. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Partee, B. H.: 1999, 'Focus, Quantification, and Semantics-Pragmatics Issues', in P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, pp. 213–231. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pierrehumbert, J. and J. Hirschberg: 1990, 'The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse', in P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, pp. 271–311. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Postal, P. M.: 1998, Three Investigations of Extraction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Roberts, C.: 1995, 'Domain Restriction in Dynamic Semantics', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 661–700. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Roberts, C.: 1996, 'Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics', in Y.-H. Toon and A. Kathol (eds.), OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49, pp. 91–136. The Ohio State University, Columbus. Rooth, M.: 1985, 'Association with Focus', PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published by GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Rooth, M.: 1992, 'A Theory of Focus Interpretation', Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116. Rooth, M.: 1996a, 'Focus', in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pp. 271–297. Blackwell, Oxford. Rooth, M.: 1996b, 'On the Interface Principles for Intonational Focus', in T. Galloway and J. Spence (eds.), Proceedings from SALT 6, pp. 202–226. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Rooth, M.: 1999, 'Association with Focus or Association with Presupposition?', in P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pp. 232–244. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Ross, J. R. and W. E. Cooper: 1979, 'Like Syntax', in W. E. Cooper and E. C. T. Walker (eds.), Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, pp. 343–418. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J. Rothstein, S.: 1995, 'Adverbial Quantification over Events', Natural Language Semantics 3, 1–31. Schubert, L. K. and F. J. Pelletier: 1987, 'Problems in the Representation of the Logical Form of Generics, Plurals, and Mass Nouns', in E. LePore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics, pp. 385–451. Academic Press, London. Schubert, L. K. and F. J. Pelletier: 1989, 'Generically Speaking, Or Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics', in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. 2, pp. 193–268. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Schwarzschild, R.: 1997, 'Why Some Foci Must Associate', unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University. Selkirk, E.: 1996, 'Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress, and Phrasing', in J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, pp. 550–569. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. von Stechow, A.: 1989, 'Focusing and Backgrounding Operators', technical report, Universität Konstanz. Steedman, M.: 2000, 'Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface', Linguistic Inquiry 31(4), 649–689. de Swart, H.: 1991, 'Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach', PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Tancredi, C.: 1997, 'Focus and Assocative Operators', unpublished manuscript, Yokohama National University. Vallduví, E.: 1992, The Informational Component (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). Garland, New York. Winkler, S.: 1997, Focus and Secondary Predication. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. Zwarts, F.: 1995, 'Nonveridical Contexts', Linguistic Analysis 25, 286–312. Zwicky, A.: 1982, 'Stranded to and Phonological Phrasing in English', Linguistics 20, 3–57.