Alternate corrections for estimating actual wetland evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration
Tóm tắt
Corrections can be used to estimate actual wetland evapotranspiration (AET) from potential evapotranspiration (PET) as a means to define the hydrology of wetland areas. Many alternate parameterizations for correction coefficients for three PET equations are presented, covering a wide range of possible data-availability scenarios. At nine sites in the wetland Everglades of south Florida, USA, the relatively complex PET Penman equation was corrected to daily total AET with smaller standard errors than the PET simple and Priestley-Taylor equations. The simpler equations, however, required less data (and thus less funding for instrumentation), with the possibility of being corrected to AET with slightly larger, comparable, or even smaller standard errors. Air temperature generally corrected PET simple most effectively to wetland AET, while wetland stage and humidity generally corrected PET Priestley-Taylor and Penman most effectively to wetland AET. Stage was identified for PET Priestley-Taylor and Penman as the data type with the most correction ability at sites that are dry part of each year or dry part of some years. Finally, although surface water generally was readily available at each monitoring site, AET was not occurring at potential rates, as conceptually expected under well-watered conditions. Apparently, factors other than water availability, such as atmospheric and stomata resistances to vapor transport, also were limiting the PET rate.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abtew, W. 1996a. Evapotranspiration measurements and modeling for three wetland systems. Journal of American Water Resources Association 32: 465–473.
Abtew, W. 1996b. Lysimeter study of evapotranspiration from a wetland. In C. R. Camp, E. J. Sadler, and R. E. Yoder (eds.) Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling, Proceedings of the International Conference, San Antonio TX, USA.
Abtew, W. and J. Obeysekera. 1995. Lysimeter study of evapotranspiration of cattails and comparison of three estimation methods. American Society of Civil Engineers 38: 121–129.
Allen, R. G., M. E. Jensen, J. L. Wright, and R. D. Burman. 1989. Operational estimates of reference Evapotranspiration. Journal of Agronomy 81: 650–662.
Allen, R. G., L. S. Periera, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO, Rome, Italy. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56.
Bidlake, W. R., W. M. Woodham, and M. A. Lopez. 1996. Evapotranspiration from areas of native vegetation in west-central Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2430.
Bowen, I. S. 1926. The ratio of heat losses by conduction and by evaporation from any water surface. Physical Review, 2nd series, 27: 779–787.
Brutsaert, W. 1982. Evaporation into the Atmosphere, Theory, History, and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Chin, D. A. 1998. Evapotranspiration of melaleuca forest in south Florida. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 3: 131–139.
Dingman, S. L. 1994. Physical Hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
German, E. R. 2000. Regional evaluation of evapotranspiration in the Everglades. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4217.
Jacobs, J. M., S. L. Mergelsberg, A. F. Lopera, and D. A. Myers. 2002. Evapotranspiration from a wet prarie wetland under drought conditions: Paynes Prairie Preserve, Florida, USA. Wetlands 22: 374–385.
Jensen, M. E., R. D. Burman, and R. G. Allen. 1990. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practices No. 70, New York, NY, USA.
Konikow, L. F. and J. D. Bredehoeft. 1992. Ground-water models cannot be validated. Advances in Water Resources 15: 75–83.
Monteith, J. L. 1965. Evaporation and environment. p. 205–233. In Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Orekes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263: 641–645.
Parkhurst, R. S., T. C. Winter, D. O. Rosenberry, and A. M. Sturrock. 1998. Evaporation from a small prairie wetland in the cottonwood lake area, North Dakota—an energy-budget study. Wetlands 18: 272–287.
Penman, H. L. 1948. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil, and grass. Proceedings Royal Society London A 193: 120–146.
Priestley, C. H. B. and R. J. Taylor. 1972. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review 100: 81–92.
Rosenberry, D. O., A. M. Sturrock, and T. C. Winter. 1993. Evaluation of the energy budget method of determining evaporation at Williams lake, Minnesota, using alternate instrumentation and study approaches. Water Resources Research 29: 2473–2483.
Shoemaker, W. B. and D. M. Sumner. 2005. Estimating changes in heat energy stored within a column of wetland surface water and factors controlling their importance in the surface energy budget. Water Resources Research, 41: W10411.
Shuttleworth, W. J. 1993. Evaporation. p. 4.1–4.53. In D. R. Maidment (ed.) Handbook of Hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA.
Standard, D. I. 1993. Comparison of penman-monteith, shuttleworth-wallace, and modified priestley-taylor evapotranspiration models for wildland vegetation in semiarid rangeland. Water Resources Research 29: 1379–1392.
Standard, D. I., D. O. Rosenberry, T. C. Winter, and R. S. Parkhurst. 2004. Estimates of fetch-induced errors in bowen-ratio energybudget measurements of evapotranspiration from a prairie wetland, Cottonwood Lake area, North Dakota, USA. Wetlands 24: 498–513.
Standard, D. I. and D. O. Rosenberry. 1991. A comparison of shortterm measurements of lake evaporation using eddy-correlation and energy-budget methods. Journal of Hydrology, 122: 15–22.
Winter, T. C., D. C. Buso, D. O. Rosenberry, G. E. Likens, A. M. Sturrock, and D. P. Mau. 2003. Evaporation determined by the energy budget method for Mirror Lake, New Hampshire. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 995–1009.
Woodall, S. L. 1980. Evapotranspiration and melaleuca. p. 117–123. In Proceedings of the Melaleuca Symposium Southeast Forest Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Florida Department of Forestry, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.