Altered metabolic and neurochemical responses to chronic unpredictable stressors in ghrelin receptor‐deficient mice

European Journal of Neuroscience - Tập 32 Số 4 - Trang 632-639 - 2010
Zachary R. Patterson1, Raymond Ducharme1, Hymie Anisman1, Alfonso Abizaid1
1Institute of Neuroscience, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, K1S 5B6 ON, Canada

Tóm tắt

AbstractGhrelin, a hormone produced by the stomach, is generally associated with feeding responses and the regulation of food intake. Recent evidence, however, suggests that ghrelin is also a stress hormone, given that it is released following acute and chronic stressors. The present study examined the role of ghrelin in producing normal metabolic and neurochemical responses to chronic stress. This was achieved by examining these responses in mice with targeted deletions of the ghrelin receptor gene (GHSR KO mice), and comparing them with the same responses in their wild‐type (WT) littermates. As expected, WT stressed mice decreased their caloric intake, body weight gain and caloric efficiency while maintaining adiposity. GHSR KO mice, however, did not show these alterations despite having normal glucocorticoid responses to stress. In parallel with these changes, chronic unpredictable stress caused changes in norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin in a number of brain regions. Of these, norepinephrine neurotransmission in the arcuate nucleus and prefrontal cortex was differentially altered in GHSR KO mice. Within the nucleus acumbens, dopamine utilization was increased in WT mice but not in GHSR KO mice. Finally, there were strain differences in serotonin neurotransmission that may explain interstrain body weight and adiposity differences. These results suggest that the metabolic changes necessary to deal with the energetic challenge presented by repeated exposure to stressors do not occur in GHSR KO mice, and they are discussed within the context of the potential vulnerability to stress‐induced pathology.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01896.x

10.1016/j.regpep.2007.10.006

10.1172/JCI29867

10.1016/0163-7258(90)90039-5

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.001

10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26014-7

10.1038/nrn2648

10.1159/000054680

10.1371/journal.pone.0004331

10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00138-9

10.1016/j.mehy.2006.04.008

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199605)23:1<28::AID-SYN4>3.0.CO;2-J

10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02552-9

10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.150

10.1006/frne.1993.1010

10.1016/S0079-6123(06)53004-3

10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136051

10.1016/j.cmet.2006.09.004

10.1210/en.2008-0038

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03839.1993

10.1210/en.2002-220659

10.1016/S0196-9781(02)00044-X

10.1097/01.psy.0000162253.07959.db

10.1100/tsw.2006.09

10.1016/S0169-328X(97)00071-5

10.1159/000088796

10.1126/science.1072327

10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb53242.x

10.1254/jphs.CRJ06002X

10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00125.x

10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00041.x

10.1210/me.2005-0084

10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00901-9

10.1046/j.1365-2826.2002.00839.x

10.1080/10253890701820257

10.1038/nm.1997

10.1038/45230

10.1016/j.regpep.2006.02.003

10.1196/annals.1410.035

10.1055/s-2007-981462

10.1016/0006-8993(91)90348-Y

10.1159/000178055

10.1038/nn.2139

10.1152/physrev.00041.2006

10.1023/A:1025770616068

10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.029

10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.045

10.1002/1096-9861(20010115)429:3<469::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-#

10.1038/35051587

10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.021

10.1016/j.lfs.2008.01.020

10.1016/0006-8993(73)90290-4

10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00194-7

10.1152/ajpgi.00321.2007

10.1210/edrv-7-3-284

10.1016/0006-8993(94)90284-4

10.1016/j.lfs.2006.11.018

10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03273-0

10.1038/35038090

10.1530/eje.0.1500905

10.1038/nrn2647

10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00415-9

10.1007/BF00187257

10.1038/nrn1406

10.1152/ajpregu.90928.2008

10.1016/j.peptides.2004.12.028

10.1002/cne.20823