Alignment of safety and security risk assessments for modular production systems

Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik - Tập 138 - Trang 454-461 - 2021
Marco Ehrlich1, Andre Bröring1, Dimitri Harder2, Torben Auhagen-Meyer3, Philip Kleen4, Lukasz Wisniewski1, Henning Trsek1, Jürgen Jasperneite4
1inIT – Institute Industrial IT, OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lemgo, Germany
2TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH, Lemgo, Germany
3Phoenix Contact Electronics GmbH, Bad Pyrmont, Germany
4Fraunhofer IOSB-INA, Lemgo, Germany

Tóm tắt

In order to ensure the safety and security of industrial systems with regard to all life cycle phases from development through operation to disposal, specific regulatory and normative requirements are imposed. Due to the digitalization, interconnection, and constantly increasing complexity of manufacturing systems in the context of Industrie 4.0, the manual effort necessary to achieve the required safety and security is becoming ever greater and almost impossible to manage, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises. Therefore, this paper examines the existing challenges in this area in more detail and gives an outlook on the possible solutions to ensure safety and security much quicker and with less manual effort. The overall vision is a (partially) automated risk assessment of modular systems with respect to safety and security, including the alignment of the corresponding processes from both domains and the formalization of the information models needed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ehrlich, M., et al. (2019): Survey of Security Standards for an automated Industrie 4.0 compatible Manufacturing. IECON, Lisbon, Portugal. Ehrlich, M., et al. (2020): Automatische Bewertung und Überwachung von Safety Security Eigenschaften – Strukturierung und Ausblick. In Jahreskolloquium Kommunikation in der Automation. Fluchs, S. (2021): On Modelling of Security Engineering a as a submodel of a Digital Twin. Blog Post. Fluchs, S. (2021): OT security and safety: two perspectives, shared objective. In The ICS CyberSec – what next? Conference. Friedberg, I., et al. (2017): STPA-SafeSec: safety and security analysis for cyber-physical systems. J. Inf. Secur. Appl., 34, 183–196. Kleen, P., Flatt, H., Jasperneite, J. (2017): Erweiterung des “Secure Plug & Work” für Safety-kritische Systeme. In Automation – Leitkongress der Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik, Baden-Baden, Germany. Lyu, X., Ding, Y., Yang, S. H. (2019): Safety and security risk assessment in cyber-physical systems. IET Cyber-Phys. Syst. Theory Appl.. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cps.2018.5068. Pattanayak, A., Kirkland, M. (2018): Current cyber security challenges in ICS. In IEEE international conference on industrial Internet, Seattle, USA. Piètre-Cambacédès, L., Bouissou, M. (2010): Modeling safety and security interdependencies with BDMP (Boolean Logic Driven Markov Processes). In IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Istanbul, Turkey. Plattform Industrie 4.0 (2020): Details of the Asset Administration Shell: Part 1 – The exchange of Information between Partners in the Value Chain of Industrie 4.0. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Plattform Industrie 4.0 (2021): Asset Administration Shell Reading Guide. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Kriaa, S., et al. (2015): A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 139, 156–178. Schmittner, C. et al. (2014): Security application of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). In Computer safety, reliability, and security. Schulman, P. R. (2020): Safety and security: managerial tensions and synergies. In The coupling of safety and security.