Albumin permeability and electrical resistance as means of assessing endothelial monolayer integrity in vitro

Howard W. Sill1, Cecil Butler, Theodore M. Hollis, John M. Tarbell1
1Departments of Biology and Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tóm tắt

Methods were developed to measure albumin permeability and electrical resistance of bovine aortic endothelial cell (BAEC) monolayers cultured on porous polycarbonate filters. Permeability to 1% bovine serum albumin (Pe) was quantified by measuring the flux of fluorescent-labeled albumin with an apparatus in which there were no transmural oncotic or hydrostatic pressure gradients. The effect of passage of BAEC monolayers in culture on permeability was studied using 60 BAEC monolayers of Passage 6 to 10. There was no significant difference in Pe between passages, and the mean Pe of all monolayers was 4.5 ± 0.5 (SEM) × 10−6 cm/s. Using these same BAEC monolayers, a fluorescent technique was developed to examine en face permeability patterns. Most BAEC monolayers demonstrated diffuse permeability across the monolayer, whereas others had focal regions of enhanced permeability despite similar Pe values. In those monolayers with punctate permeability, there were 5.4 ± 0.6 (SEM) focal regions of enhanced permeability per 1000 cells. To study the effect of culture time on monolayer integrity, electrical conductivities of nine BAEC monolayers were measured daily using a Millipore electrical resistance system. Electrical resistance increased from 4.5 ohm·cm2 at Day 2 to a peak level of 11.4 ohm·cm2 at Day 7 and then decreased daily to 4.0 ohm·cm2 by Day 12. The in vitro BAEC monolayer has many of the transport characteristics of intact vessels, making these techniques useful in physiologic studies of the endothelial transport barrier. These methods provide relatively simple means of assessing the integrity of endothelial cell monolayers grown on porous substrates.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albeda, S. M.; Sampson, P. M.; Haselton, F. R., et al. Permeability characteristics of cultured endothelial cell monolayers. J. Appl. Physiol. 64:308–322; 1988.

Cereijido, M.; Meza, I.; Martinez-Palomo, A. Occluding junctions in cultured epithelial monolayers. Am. J. Physiol. 240:C96-C102; 1981.

Davies, P. F. Quantitative aspects of endocytosis in cultured endothelial cells. In: Jaffe, E. A., ed. Biology of endothelial cells. Boston: Nijhfoft 1984:365–376.

Dull, R. O.; Jo, H.; Sill, H., et al. The effect of varying albumin concentration and hydrostatic pressure on hydraulic conductivity and albumin permeability of cultured endothelial monolayers. Microvasc. Res. 41:390–407; 1991.

Garcia, J. G. N.; Siflinger-Birnheim, A.; Bizios, R., et al. Thrombin-induced increases in albumin permeability across the endothelium. J. Cell. Physiol. 128:96–104; 1986.

Hennig, B.; Shaby, M. D.; Fulton, A. B., et al. Exposure to free fatty acid increases the transfer of albumin across cultured endothelial monolayers. Arteriosclerosis 4:489–497; 1984.

Jo, H.; Dull, R. O.; Hollis, T. M., et al. Endothelial albumin permeability is shear-dependent, time-dependent and reversible. Am. J. Physiol. H29:H1991–1996; 1991.

Katora, M.; Hollis, T. M. A simple fluorescent method for quantitative determination of aortic protein uptake. J. Appl. Physiol. 39:145–149; 1975.

Lin, S. J.; Jan, K. M.; Schuessler, G., et al. Enhanced macromolecular permeability of aortic endothelial cells in association with mitosis. Atherosclerosis 73:223–232; 1988.

Lin, S. J.; Jan, K. M.; Schuessler, G., et al. Transendothelial transport of low density lipoprotein in association with cell mitosis in rat aorta. Arteriosclerosis 9:230–236; 1989.

Nairn, R. C. Fluorescent protein tracing. London: E. & S. Livingston Ltd; 1962.

Navab, M.; Hough, G. P.; Berliner, J. A., et al. Rabbit beta-migrating very low density lipoprotein increases endothelial macromolecular transport without altering electrical resistance. J. Clin. Invest. 78:389–397; 1986.

O'Donnell, M. P.; Vargas, F. F. Electrical conductivity and its use in estimating equivalent pore size for arterial endothelium. Am. J. Physiol. 19:H16-H21; 1986.

Postlewaite, A. E.; Snyderman, R.; Kang, H. G. The chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts to lymphocyte-derived factor. J. Exp. Med. 144:1188–1203; 1976.

Renkin, E. M.; Curry, F. E. Transport of water and solutes across capillary endothelium. In: Giebisch, B.; Toteson, D. C.; Ussing, H. H., eds. Membrane transport in biology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1979:chapter 1.

Ryan, T. A.; Joiner, B. L., editors. Minitab student handbook. Boston MA: Duxbury Press; 1976.

Territo, M.; Berliner, J. A.; Fogelman, A. M. Effect of monocyte migration on low density lipoprotein transport across aortic endothelial cell monolayers. J. Clin. Invest. 74:2279–2284; 1984.

Truskey, G. A.; Colton, C. K.; Smith, K. A. Quantitative analysis of protein transport in the arterial wall. In: Schwartz, C. J.; Werthessen, J. T.; Wolf, S., eds. Structure and function of the circulation, vol. 3. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.; 1981:187.