Air Quality Response Modeling for Decision Support

Atmosphere - Tập 2 Số 3 - Trang 407-425
Daniel S. Cohan1, Sergey L. Napelenok2
1United States Environmental Protection Agency
2Rice University

Tóm tắt

Air quality management relies on photochemical models to predict the responses of pollutant concentrations to changes in emissions. Such modeling is especially important for secondary pollutants such as ozone and fine particulate matter which vary nonlinearly with changes in emissions. Numerous techniques for probing pollutant-emission relationships within photochemical models have been developed and deployed for a variety of decision support applications. However, atmospheric response modeling remains complicated by the challenge of validating sensitivity results against observable data. This manuscript reviews the state of the science of atmospheric response modeling as well as efforts to characterize the accuracy and uncertainty of sensitivity results.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Dennis, 2010, A framework for evaluating regional-scale numerical photochemical modeling systems, Environ. Fluid Mech., 10, 471, 10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2

US-EPA (2007). Guidance on the use of models and other analyses for demonstrating attainment of air quality goals for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze. EPA-454/B-07-002.

Cohan, 2007, An integrated framework for multipollutant air quality management and its application in Georgia, Environmen. Manag., 40, 545, 10.1007/s00267-006-0228-4

Brunekreef, 2002, Air pollution and health, Lancet, 360, 1233, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8

Fuhrer, 2002, Ozone impacts on vegetation, Ozone Sc. Eng., 24, 69, 10.1080/01919510208901597

Lin, 1988, On the nonlinearity of the tropospheric ozone production, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 15879, 10.1029/JD093iD12p15879

Russell, 1997, Regional photochemical air quality modeling: Model formulations, history, and state of the science, Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 22, 537, 10.1146/annurev.energy.22.1.537

Altshuler, 1995, Weekday vs. Weekend ambient ozone concentrations—Discussion and hypotheses with focus on Northern California, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 45, 967, 10.1080/10473289.1995.10467428

Pierce, 2010, Dynamic evaluation of a regional air quality model: Assessing the emissions-induced weekly ozone cycle, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3583, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.046

Gilliland, 2008, Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality models: Assessing changes in O-3 stemming from changes in emissions and meteorology, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5110, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.018

Hogrefe, 2008, Rethinking the assessment of photochemical modeling systems in air quality planning applications, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 58, 1086, 10.3155/1047-3289.58.8.1086

Roth, 2005, Air quality modeling and decisions for ozone reduction strategies, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 55, 1558, 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464751

Tagaris, E., Manomaiphiboon, K., Liao, K.J., Leung, L.R., Woo, J.H., He, S., Amar, P., and Russell, A.G. (2007). Impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations over the United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112.

Tao, Z.N., Williams, A., Huang, H.C., Caughey, M., and Liang, X.Z. (2007). Sensitivity of U.S. surface ozone to future emissions and climate changes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34.

Roselle, 1995, Modeled response of photochemical oxidants to systematic reductions in anthropogenic volatile organic-compound and nox emissions, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 100, 22929, 10.1029/95JD00505

Hakami, 2007, The adjoint of CMAQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 7807, 10.1021/es070944p

Henze, 2007, Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2413, 10.5194/acp-7-2413-2007

Napelenok, 2006, Decoupled direct 3D sensitivity analysis for particulate matter (DDM-3D/PM), Atmos. Environ., 40, 6112, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.039

Hill, 2009, Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 2077, 10.1073/pnas.0812835106

US-EPA (2006). Technical Support Document for the proposed PM NAAQS Rule: Response Surface Modeling.

Xing, 2011, Nonlinear response of ozone to precursor emission changes in China: A modeling study using response surface methodology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5027, 10.5194/acp-11-5027-2011

Yang, 1997, Fast, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional photochemical models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 2859, 10.1021/es970117w

Dunker, 1984, The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics, J. Chem. Phys., 81, 2385, 10.1063/1.447938

Elbern, 1997, Variational data assimilation for tropospheric chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 102, 15967, 10.1029/97JD01213

Cohan, 2005, Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6739, 10.1021/es048664m

Dunker, 2002, The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model—Implementation, accuracy, and efficiency, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 2965, 10.1021/es0112691

Hakami, 2003, High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2442, 10.1021/es020677h

Martien, 2006, Adjoint sensitivity analysis for a three-dimensional photochemical model: Application to Southern California, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4200, 10.1021/es051026z

Mcrae, 1982, Development of a 2nd-generation mathematical model for urban air pollution. 1. Model formulation, Atmos. Environ., 16, 679, 10.1016/0004-6981(82)90386-9

Dunker, 1981, Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models, Atmos. Environ. Part A, 15, 1155, 10.1016/0004-6981(81)90305-X

Koo, 2007, Implementing the decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 2847, 10.1021/es0619962

Napelenok, 2008, Extension and evaluation of sensitivity analysis capabilities in a photochemical model, Environ. Model. Softw., 23, 994, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.004

Hakami, A., Odman, M.T., and Russell, A.G. (2004). Nonlinearity in atmospheric response: A direct sensitivity analysis approach. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 109.

Jin, 2008, Sensitivity analysis of ozone formation and transport for a central California air pollution episode, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3683, 10.1021/es072069d

Kim, 2009, Contributions of inter- and intra-state emissions to ozone over Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 26, 103, 10.1080/10286600802005364

Xiao, X., Cohan, D.S., Byun, D.W., and Ngan, F. (2010). Highly nonlinear ozone formation in the Houston region and implications for emission controls. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115.

Zhang, W., and Russell, A.G. (, January January). The Decoupled Direct Method for Higher-Order Sensitivity Analysis for Particulate Matter in Multidimensional Air Quality Models. Atlanta, GA, USA.

Cohan, 2006, Control strategy optimization for attainment and exposure mitigation: Case study for ozone in Macon, Georgia, Environ. Manag., 38, 451, 10.1007/s00267-005-0226-y

Tagaris, 2010, Sensitivity of Air Pollution-Induced Premature Mortality to Precursor Emissions under the Influence of Climate Change, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 7, 2222, 10.3390/ijerph7052222

Liao, 2007, Sensitivities of ozone and fine particulate matter formation to emissions under the impact of potential future climate change, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8355, 10.1021/es070998z

Hu, Y.T., Odman, M.T., and Russell, A.G. (2009). Top-down analysis of the elemental carbon emissions inventory in the United States by inverse modeling using Community Multiscale Air Quality model with decoupled direct method (CMAQ-DDM). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 114.

Russell, 2000, Iterative inverse modeling and direct sensitivity analysis of a photochemical air quality model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 4974, 10.1021/es991040+

Napelenok, 2008, A method for evaluating spatially-resolved nox emissions using Kalman filter inversion, direct sensitivities, and space-based NO2 observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5603, 10.5194/acp-8-5603-2008

Cohan, 2010, Influence of uncertain reaction rates on ozone sensitivity to emissions, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3101, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.034

Gao, 1996, Global uncertainty analysis of a regional-scale gas-phase chemical mechanism, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 9107, 10.1029/96JD00060

Menut, 2000, Sensitivity of photochemical pollution using the adjoint of a simplified chemistry-transport model, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 105, 15379, 10.1029/1999JD900953

Sandu, 2005, Adjoint sensitivity analysis of regional air quality models, J. Comput. Phys., 204, 222, 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.011

Hakami, 2006, Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3855, 10.1021/es052135g

Henze, 2009, Inverse modeling and mapping US air quality influences of inorganic PM2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5877, 10.5194/acp-9-5877-2009

Hakami, A., Henze, D.K., Seinfeld, J.H., Chai, T., Tang, Y., Carmichael, G.R., and Sandu, A. (2005). Adjoint inverse modeling of black carbon during the Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 110.

Zhang, L., Jacob, D.J., Kopacz, M., Henze, D.K., Singh, K., and Jaffe, D.A. (2009). Intercontinental source attribution of ozone pollution at western US sites using an adjoint method. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36.

Kopacz, 2011, Origin and radiative forcing of black carbon transported to the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2837, 10.5194/acp-11-2837-2011

Sirkes, 1997, Finite difference of adjoint or adjoint of finite difference?, Mon. Weather Rev., 49, 5

Sandu, 2008, On the properties of discrete adjoints of numerical methods for the advection equation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluid., 56, 769, 10.1002/fld.1547

Hopke, P.K. (1985). Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry, John Wiley.

Mysliwiec, 2002, Source apportionment of secondary airborne particulate matter in a polluted atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 5376, 10.1021/es020832s

Ying, Q., and Krishnan, A. (2010). Source contributions of volatile organic compounds to ozone formation in southeast Texas. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115.

Bhave, 2007, Diagnostic model evaluation for carbonaceous PM2.5 using organic markers measured in the southeastern US, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 1577, 10.1021/es061785x

Samaali, 2011, Application of a tagged-species method to source apportionment of primary PM(2.5) components in a regional air quality model, Atmos. Environ., 45, 3835, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.007

Dunker, 2002, Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 2953, 10.1021/es011418f

(2008). User's Guide—Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions Version 4.50.

Sillman, S., and He, D.Y. (2002). Some theoretical results concerning O-3-nox-VOC chemistry and nox-VOC indicators. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 107.

Wagstrom, 2008, Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport model, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5650, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.012

Wang, Z.S., Chien, C.J., and Tonnesen, G.S. (2009). Development of a tagged species source apportionment algorithm to characterize three-dimensional transport and transformation of precursors and secondary pollutants. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 114.

Dennis, 2008, Observable indicators of the sensitivity of PM2.5 nitrate to emission reductions—Part II: Sensitivity to errors in total ammonia and total nitrate of the CMAQ-predicted non-linear effect of SO2 emission reductions, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1287, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.036

Carlton, 2010, To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 3376, 10.1021/es903506b

Baker, 2011, A nonlinear regression model estimating single source concentrations of primary and secondarily formed PM2.5, Atmos. Environ., 45, 3758, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.074

Zavala, 2009, Modeled and observed ozone sensitivity to mobile-source emissions in Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 39, 10.5194/acp-9-39-2009

Wu, S.L., Mickley, L.J., Jacob, D.J., Logan, J.A., Yantosca, R.M., and Rind, D. (2007). Why are there large differences between models in global budgets of tropospheric ozone?. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112.

Thunis, 2007, Analysis of model responses to emission-reduction scenarios within the citydelta project, Atmos. Environ., 41, 208, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.001

Marr, 2002, Modeling the effect of weekday-weekend differences in motor vehicle emissions on photochemical air pollution in central California, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4099, 10.1021/es020629x

Napelenok, 2011, Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality model's response to emission reductions in the presence of uncertain emission inventories, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4091, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.030

Sillman, 1995, The use of noy, H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-nox-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 100, 14175, 10.1029/94JD02953

Liu, 1987, Ozone production in the rural troposphere and the implications for regional and global ozone distributions, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 92, 4191, 10.1029/JD092iD04p04191

Pinder, 2008, Observable indicators of the sensitivity of PM2.5 nitrate to emission reductions—Part I: Derivation of the adjusted gas ratio and applicability at regulatory-relevant time scales, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1275, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.039

Chow, 2002, Review of PM2.5 and PM10 apportionment for fossil fuel combustion and other sources by the chemical mass balance receptor model, Energy Fuels, 16, 222, 10.1021/ef0101715

Reff, 2007, Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using positive matrix factorization: Review of existing methods, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 57, 146, 10.1080/10473289.2007.10465319

Schauer, 1996, Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers, Atmos. Environ., 30, 3837, 10.1016/1352-2310(96)00085-4

Marmur, 2006, Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the southeastern United States using receptor and emissions-based models: Conceptual differences and implications for time-series health studies, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2533, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.019

Lee, 2009, Ensemble-trained PM2.5 source apportionment approach for health studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7023, 10.1021/es9004703

Fine, 2003, Evaluating uncertainties in regional photochemical air quality modeling, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 28, 59, 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.011503.163508

Bergin, 1999, Formal uncertainty analysis of a Lagrangian photochemical air pollution model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1116, 10.1021/es980749y

Deguillaume, L., Beekman, M., and Derognat, C. (2008). Uncertainty evaluation of ozone production and its sensitivity to emission changes over the Ile-de-France region during summer periods. J. Geophys. Res., 113.

Hanna, 2001, Uncertainties in predicted ozone concentrations due to input uncertainties for the UAM-V photochemical grid model applied to the July 1995 OTAG domain, Atmos. Environ., 35, 891, 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00367-8

Digar, 2010, Efficient Characterization of Pollutant-Emission Response under Parametric Uncertainty, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 6724, 10.1021/es903743t

Pinder, 2009, Efficient probabilistic estimates of surface ozone concentration using an ensemble of model configurations and direct sensitivity calculations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2388, 10.1021/es8025402

Tian, 2010, Uncertainty analysis of ozone formation and response to emission controls using higher-order sensitivities, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 60, 797, 10.3155/1047-3289.60.7.797

Sandu, 2008, Discrete second order adjoints in atmospheric chemical transport modeling, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 5949, 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.02.011

Bergin, 2000, Application of Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis to a Lagrangian photochemical air quality model, Atmos. Environ., 34, 781, 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00346-5

Deguillaume, L., Beekman, M., and Menut, L. (2007). Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis applied to regional-scale inverse emission modeling for reactive trace gases. J. Geophys. Res., 112.

Koo, 2009, Comparison of Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in a Particulate Matter Air Quality Model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 6669, 10.1021/es9008129

Zhang, Y., Vijayaraghavan, K., and Seigneur, C. (2005). Evaluation of three probing techniques in a three-dimensional air quality model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 110.

Jeffries, 1994, A comparison of 2 photochemical-reaction mechanisms using mass-balance and process analysis, Atmos. Environ., 28, 2991, 10.1016/1352-2310(94)90345-X

Jang, 1995, Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution. 2. Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 29, 3101, 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00119-J

Jiang, 2003, Using back trajectories and process analysis to investigate photochemical ozone production in the Puget Sound region, Atmos. Environ., 37, 1489, 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01027-0

Henderson, 2010, The influence of model resolution on ozone in industrial volatile organic compound plumes, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 60, 1105, 10.3155/1047-3289.60.9.1105