Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women
Tóm tắt
Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured in the first trimester are both used to estimate pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) but there is limited information on how they compare, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where access to a weight scale can be limited. Thus, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured during the first trimester of pregnancy among Brazilian women so as to assess whether self-reported pre-pregnancy weight is reliable and can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG. Data from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium (BMCNC, n = 5563) and the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (SISVAN, n = 393,095) were used to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weights measured in three overlapping intervals (30–94, 30–60 and 30–45 days of pregnancy) and their impact in BMI classification. We calculated intraclass correlation and Lin’s concordance coefficients, constructed Bland and Altman plots, and determined Kappa coefficient for the categories of BMI. The mean of the differences between self-reported and measured weights was < 2 kg during the three intervals examined for BMCNC (1.42, 1.39 and 1.56 kg) and about 1 kg for SISVAN (1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 kg). Intraclass correlation and Lin’s coefficient were > 0.90 for both datasets in all time intervals. Bland and Altman plots showed that the majority of the difference laid in the ±2 kg interval and that the differences did not vary according to measured first-trimester BMI. Kappa coefficient values were > 0.80 for both datasets at all intervals. Using self-reported pre-pregnancy or measured weight would change, in total, the classification of BMI in 15.9, 13.5, and 12.2% of women in the BMCNC and 12.1, 10.7, and 10.2% in the SISVAN, at 30–94, 30–60 and 30–45 days, respectively. In Brazil, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG when an early measurement of weight during pregnancy is not available. These results are especially important in a country where the majority of woman do not initiate prenatal care early in pregnancy.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Harris HE, Ellison GT. Practical approaches for estimating prepregnant body weight. J. Nurse Midwifery. 1998;43(2):97–101.
Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. xiv. p. p. 854.
Amorim AR, Linne Y, Kac G, Lourenco PM. Assessment of weight changes during and after pregnancy: practical approaches. Matern. Child Nutr. 2008;4(1):1–13.
Bodnar LM, Abrams B, Bertolet M, Gernand AD, Parisi SM, Himes KP, et al. Validity of birth certificate-derived maternal weight data. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2014;28(3):203–12.
Han E, Abrams B, Sridhar S, Xu F, Hedderson M. Validity of self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and body mass index classification in an integrated health care delivery system. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2016;30(4):314–9.
Holland E, Moore Simas TA, Doyle Curiale DK, Liao X, Waring ME. Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight versus weight measured at first prenatal visit: effects on categorization of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Matern. Child Health J. 2013;17(10):1872–8.
Craig BM, Adams AK. Accuracy of body mass index categories based on self-reported height and weight among women in the United States. Matern. Child Health J. 2009;13(4):489–96.
Shin D, Chung H, Weatherspoon L, Song WO. Validity of prepregnancy weight status estimated from self-reported height and weight. Matern. Child Health J. 2014;18(7):1667–74.
Yu SM, Nagey DA. Validity of self-reported pregravid weight. Ann. Epidemiol. 1992;2(5):715–21.
Brunner Huber LR. Validity of self-reported height and weight in women of reproductive age. Matern. Child Health J. 2007;11(2):137–44.
Headen I, Cohen AK, Mujahid M, Abrams B. The accuracy of self-reported pregnancy-related weight: a systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2017;18(3):350–69.
Oliveira AF, Gadelha AM, Leal MC, Szwarcwald CL. Study of validity in self-reported weight and height among pregnant women treated at municipal maternity hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cad. Saude Publica. 2004;20 Suppl 1:S92–100.
Niquini RP, Bittencourt SA, Leal MC. Conformity of pre-gestational weight measurement and agreement of anthropometric data reported by pregnant women and those recorded in prenatal cards, City of Rio de Janeiro, 2007-2008. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2013;16:670–81.
Araújo RGPS, Gama SGN, Barros DC, Saunders C, Mattos IE. Validity of self-reported weight, height, and BMI in mothers of the research birth in Brazil. Rev. Saude Publica. 2017;51:115.
Carrilho TRB, Farias DR, Batalha MA, Costa NCF, Rasmussen KM, Reichenheim ME, et al. Brazilian maternal and child nutrition consortium: establishment, data harmonization and basic characteristics. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14869.
Nascimento FAD, Silva SAD, Jaime PC. Coverage of assessment of nutritional status in the Brazilian food and nutritional surveillance system, 2008–2013. Cad. Saude Publica. 2017;33(12):e00161516.
Yang S, Hutcheon JA. Identifying outliers and implausible values in growth trajectory data. Ann. Epidemiol. 2016;26(1):77–80 e1–2.
Shi J, Korsiak J, Roth DE. New approach for the identification of implausible values and outliers in longitudinal childhood anthropometric data. Ann. Epidemiol. 2018;28(3):204–11 e3.
WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995. x. p. p. 452.
Papageorghiou AT, Kemp B, Stones W, Ohuma EO, Kennedy SH, Purwar M, et al. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;48(6):719–26.
Pitkin RM. Nutritional support in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1976;19(3):489–513.
Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–68.
Watson PF, Petrie A. Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology. Theriogenology. 2010;73(9):1167–79.24.
Dixon PM, Saint-Maurice PF, Kim Y, Hibbing P, Bai Y, Welk GJ. A primer on the use of equivalence testing for evaluating measurement agreement. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2018;50(4):837–45.
Lakens D, Scheel AM, Isager PM. Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2018;1(2):259–69.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.
Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46.
Reichenheim ME. Confidence intervals for the kappa statistic. Stata J. 2004;4(4):421–8.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use: Oxford University press; 2015.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX; 2017.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 3.4.0 ed. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.
Park S, Sappenfield WM, Bish C, Bensyl DM, Goodman D, Menges J. Reliability and validity of birth certificate prepregnancy weight and height among women enrolled in prenatal WIC program: Florida, 2005. Matern. Child Health J. 2011;15(7):851–9.
McClure CK, Bodnar LM, Ness R, Catov JM. Accuracy of maternal recall of gestational weight gain 4 to 12 years after delivery. Obesity. 2011;19(5):1047–53.
Tomeo CA, Rich-Edwards JW, Michels KB, Berkey CS, Hunter DJ, Frazier AL, et al. Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiology. 1999;10(6):774–7.
Fattah C, Farah N, O'Toole F, Barry S, Stuart B, Turner MJ. Body mass index (BMI) in women booking for antenatal care: comparison between selfreported and digital measurements. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009;144(1):32–4.
Gaillard R, Steegers EA, Franco OH, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Maternal weight gain in different periods of pregnancy and childhood cardio-metabolic outcomes. The generation R study. Int. J. Obes. (Lond). 2015;39(4):677–85.
Karachaliou M, Georgiou V, Roumeliotaki T, Chalkiadaki G, Daraki V, Koinaki S, et al. Association of trimester-specific gestational weight gain with fetal growth, offspring obesity, and cardiometabolic traits in early childhood. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;212(4):502 e1–14.
Rifas-Shiman SL, Fleisch A, Hivert MF, Mantzoros C, Gillman MW, Oken E. First and second trimester gestational weight gains are most strongly associated with cord blood levels of hormones at delivery important for glycemic control and somatic growth. Metab Clin Exp. 2017;69:112–9.
Santos S, Eekhout I, Voerman E, Gaillard R, Barros H, Charles MA, et al. Gestational weight gain charts for different body mass index groups for women in Europe, North America, and Oceania. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):201.
Hutcheon JA, Platt RW, Abrams B, Himes KP, Simhan HN, Bodnar LM. Pregnancy weight gain charts for obese and overweight women. Obesity. 2015;23(3):532–5.
Cheikh Ismail L, Bishop DC, Pang R, Ohuma EO, Kac G, Abrams B, et al. Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2016;352:i555.
Johansson K, Hutcheon JA, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S. Pregnancy weight gain by gestational age and BMI in Sweden: a population-based cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;103(5):1278–84.
Krukowski RA, West DS, DiCarlo M, Shankar K, Cleves MA, Saylors ME, et al. Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):357.