Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baayen, 2008, Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Badecker, B., Lewis, R. (2007). A new theory and computational model of working memory in sentence production: Agreement errors as failures of cue-based retrieval. Paper presented at the 20th annual CUNY sentence processing conference. San Diego, La Jolla, CA: University of California.
Badecker, 2007, Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak, Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 65, 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.004
Bayer, 1996, Features and agreement, 70
Bertram, 2000, Word morphology in context: Effects of base and surface frequency, Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 367, 10.1080/01690960050119634
Bock, 1992, Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production, Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99, 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90007-K
Bock, 1993, Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement, Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57, 10.1080/01690969308406949
Bock, 2004, Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs, Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 251, 10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.005
Brunk, 1975
Byram, M. (2007). Double objects in left to right syntax. Unpublished honors thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Clark, 1973, The language-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy: Critique of language statistics in psychological research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335, 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3
Clifton, 1999, Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension, Rivista di Linguistica, 11, 11
den Dikken, 2001, ÌPluringularsî, pronouns and quirky agreement, The Linguistic Review, 18, 19, 10.1515/tlir.18.1.19
Eberhard, 1997, The marked effect of number on subject–verb agreement, Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 147, 10.1006/jmla.1996.2484
Eberhard, 2005, Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production, Psychological Review, 112, 531, 10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.531
Francis, 1986, Proximity concord in English, Journal of English Linguistics, 19, 309, 10.1177/007542428601900212
Franck, 2006, Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction, Cognition, 101, 173, 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.003
Franck, 2002, Attraction in sentence production: The role of syntactic structure, Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 371, 10.1080/01690960143000254
Frazier, 1989, Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch, Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331, 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90037-5
Gazdar, 1985
Gillund, 1984, A retrieval model for both recognition and recall, Psychological Review, 91, 1, 10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1
Hartsuiker, 2001, Object attraction in subject–verb agreement construction, Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 546, 10.1006/jmla.2000.2787
Haskell, 2005, Constituent structure and linear order in language production: Evidence from subject verb agreement, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 891, 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.891
Häussler, J. & Bader, M. (2009). Agreement checking and number attraction in sentence comprehension: Insights from German relative clauses. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 7.
Hemforth, B. & Konieczny, L. (2003). Proximity in agreement errors. In Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Boston, MA.
Hintzman, 1988, Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model, Psychological Review, 95, 528, 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
Jackendoff, 1977
Jespersen, 1924
Just, 1982, Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 228, 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228
Kaan, 2002, Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in agreement processing: An ERP study, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 165, 10.1023/A:1014978917769
Kayne, 1989, Notes on English agreement, Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages Bulletin, 1, 41
Kimball, 1971, I think, you think, he think, Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 241
Lau, E., Wagers, M., Stroud, C., & Phillips, C. (2008). Agreement and the subject of confusion. Paper presented at the 21st annual CUNY sentence processing conference. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
Lau, E.F., Wagers, M., & Phillips, C. (2009). The consequences of number agreement on number interpretation. Poster presented at the 22nd Annual meeting of the CUNY conference on human sentence processing. Davis, CA: UC Davis.
Lau, 2007, Syntactic prediction and lexical surface frequency effects in sentence processing, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, 163
Lehtonen, 2006, Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 121, 10.1007/s10936-005-9008-1
Lewis, 2005, An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval, Cognitive Science, 29, 1, 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
Luce, 1986
McElree, 2006, Accessing recent events, Vol. 46
McElree, 2003, Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 67, 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00515-6
New, 2004, The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English, Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 568, 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.010
Nicol, 1997, Subject–verb agreement processes in comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 569, 10.1006/jmla.1996.2497
Niswander, 2000, The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading, Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 389, 10.1080/01690960050119643
Nunberg, 2003, Machines make moral judgments selectively, The New York Times, 5
Pearlmutter, 2000, Linear versus hierarchical agreement feature processing in comprehension, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 89, 10.1023/A:1005128624716
Pearlmutter, 1999, Agreement processes in sentence comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427, 10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
Plate, 2003
Pollard, 1994
Potter, 1988, Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing
Potter, 1992, The regeneration of syntax in short-term memory, Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 713, 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90036-W
Quirk, 1985
Raaijmakers, 1999, How to deal with “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions, Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416, 10.1006/jmla.1999.2650
Ratcliff, 1993, Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510, 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
Selman, 1985, A rule-based connectionist parsing system, 212
Shieber, S. M. (1986). An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. CSLI lecture notes No. 4. Stanford: CSLI.
Solomon, 2004, Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production, Cognitive Psychology, 49, 1, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.10.001
Stowe, 1986, Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location, Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227, 10.1080/01690968608407062
Tabor, 2004, Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing, Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 355, 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.001
Thornton, 2003, Plausibility and grammatical agreement, Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 740, 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00003-2
Traxler, 1996, Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study, Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 454, 10.1006/jmla.1996.0025
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 7.
Van der Velde, 2006, Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 37, 10.1017/S0140525X06009022
van Riemsdijk, 1986
Vasishth, S. (2006). On the proper treatment of spillover in real-time reading studies: Consequences for psycholinguistic theories. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence. Tübingen, Germany.
Vigliocco, 1998, Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production. Is proximity concord syntactic or linear?, Cognition, 68, 3, 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00041-9
Wagers, M. (2008). The structure of memory meets memory for structure in linguistic cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.