Agreement Features, Agreement and Antiagreement

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 23 - Trang 655-686 - 2005
Jamal Ouhalla1
1Linguistics Department, University College, Dublin, Ireland

Tóm tắt

There are empirical reasons to think that the role traditionally assigned to specialized categorial features such as [V] and [N] is performed by independently needed features, some of which are agreement features. In appropriate contexts, the verbal feature reduces to [PERSON] and the nominal feature to [CLASS]. This view, along with the fact that agreement features come in bundles, leads to a novel way of looking at verb–subject agreement. Understood as the reflex of feature-matching and deletion, verb–subject agreement is essentially a mechanism of categorization by computation. It leads to deletion of the nominal agreement feature from the verb and related functional heads and the verbal agreement feature from the subject. Further empirical support for this way of looking at agreement comes from the antiagreement phenomenon, which turns out to be a reflex of the peculiar categorial identity of the predicate in relevant sentences. The examples used in the article are mainly from Berber.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Artemis. Alexiadou (2001) Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity John Benjamins Amsterdam/Philadelphia Mark C. Baker (2003) Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives Cambridge University Press Cambridge Elabbas. Benmamoun (2000) The Feature Structure of Functional Categories: A Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects Oxford University Press New York/Oxford Emile. Benveniste (1971) Problems in General Linguistics University of Miami Press Coral Gables, FL David. Bobaljik Jonathan (2002) ArticleTitle‘Realizing Germanic Inflection: Why Morphology does not Drive Syntax’ Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6 129–167 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023669927250 Hagit. Borer (2003) ‘Exo-skeletal vs Endo-skeletalExplanations: Syntactic Projections theLexicon J. Moore M. Polinsky (Eds) Explanations in Linguistic Theory. CSLI Stanford 31–67 Boukhris Fatima. (1998). Les Clitiques en Berbère Tamazighte, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University Mohamed V, Rabat John. Bowers (2002) ArticleTitle‘Transitivity’ Linguistic Inquiry 33 183–224 Occurrence Handle10.1162/002438902317406696 Luciana. Brandi Cordin. Patricia (1989) ‘Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter’ O. Jaeggli K. Safir (Eds) The Null Subject Parameter. Kluwer Dordrecht 111–142 Chafiq Mohamed. (1990). 44 Lessons in the Tamazight Language, teaching manual, Arab-Africa Press, Cairo & Rabat Noam. Chomsky (1995) The Minimalist Program MIT Press Cambridge, MA Noam. Chomsky (2000) ‘Minimalist Inquiries’ R. Martin D. Michaels J. Uriagereka (Eds) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. MIT Press Cambridge, MA 89–156 Noam. Chomsky (2001a) ‘Derivation by Phase’ M. Kenstowicz (Eds) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. MIT Press Cambridge, MA 1–52 Noam. Chomsky (2001b) ‘Beyond Explanatory Adequacy’, ms MIT Cambridge, MA M.W. Dixon Robert (1994) Ergativity Cambridge University Press Cambridge Ellaty, Youhanna. (1994). Le Cas verbal: syntax et morphologie, thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris VIII El Moujahid El Houssain. (1993). Syntaxe du Group Nominal en Berbère Tachelhiyt, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University Mohamed V, Rabat Elouazizi, Noureddine. (2003). Clitic clustering in Tarifit Berber, draft of a Ph.D. dissertation in preparation, ULCL, Leiden Carol. Georgopoulos (1991) Syntactic Variables: Resumptive Pronouns and A′ Binding in Palauan Kluwer Dordrecht Guerssel Mohamed. (1987). ‘The Status of the Lexical Category Preposition in Berber: Implications for the Nature of the Construct State’. In: Guerssel M., Hale K. (ed). Studies in Berber Syntax: Lexicon Project Working Papers, Vol. 14, MIT, pp. 159–190 Moham Guerssel (1995) ArticleTitle‘Berber Clitic Doubling and Syntactic Structure’ Revue québécoise de linguistique 24 111–133 Isabelle. Haïk (1990) ArticleTitle‘Anaphoric, Pronominal and Referential INFL’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8 347–374 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00135618 Alain. Kihm (2001) ‘Noun Class, Gender, and the Lexicon-Syntax-Morphology Interfaces’ R. Kayne G. Cinque (Eds) Handbook of Comparative Syntax. Oxford University Press Oxford/New York Marantz Alec. (1997). ‘No Escape from Syntax: Don’t try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of your Own Lexicon’. In: Dimitriadis A., Siegel L., Surek-Clark C., Williams A. (ed). Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 4. Penn Linguistics Club, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 201–225 Mohammad, Mohammad. (1989). ‘On the parallelisms between IP and DP’, Proceedings of WCCFL Vol. 7, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 241–254 Ali. Mohammed Aoussouk. (1992) Tuareg Clause Structure, unpublished MA dissertation University of North Wales Bangor Lea. Nash Rouveret. Alain (2002) ArticleTitle‘Cliticization as Unselective Attract’ Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1 157–199 Rolf. Noyer Robert (1992) Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation MIT Cambridge, MA Ouhalla Jamal. (1988). The Syntax of Head Movement: A Study of Berber, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University College London Jamal. Ouhalla (1991) Functional Categories and Parametric. Variation Routledge London Jamal. Ouhalla (1993) ArticleTitle‘Subject-Extraction, Negation and the Anti-agreement Effect’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11 477–518 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00993167 Ouhalla Jamal. (1996). ‘The Construct State in Berber’. In: Lecarme J., Lowenstamm J., Shlonsky U. (ed). Studies in Afroasiatic Grammar: Papers from the Second Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis, 1994. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague, pp. 278–301 Jamal. Ouhalla (2001) ‘Clitic-placement, Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in Berber’ R. Kayne G. Cinque (Eds) Handbook of Comparative Syntax. Oxford University Press New York Colin. Phillips (1998) ‘Disagreement between Adults and Children’ A. Mendikoetxea M. Uribe-Etxebarria (Eds) Theoretical Issues on the Morphology-Syntax Interface. ASJU San Sebastian 359–394 Christer. Platzack Holmberg. Anders (1989) ArticleTitle‘The Role of AGR and Finiteness’ Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 43 21–58 Reesink, Pieter. (1979). Problèmes de détermination en Indo-européen et dans une langue chamito-sémitique, Thèse de 3ème cycle, Paris, E.P.H.E Norvin. Richards (2001) Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures Oxford University Press New York/Oxford Bernhard. Rohrbacher (1999) Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and pro drop John Benjamins Amsterdam Robin. Schafer (1995) ArticleTitleNegation and Verb Second in Breton’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13 135–172 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00992780 Patricia. Schneider-Zioga (1995) ArticleTitle‘Specifier/Head Agreement in Kinande’ Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa 23 67–93 Timothy. Stowell (1982) ArticleTitle‘The Tense of Infinitives’ Linguistic Inquiry 13 561–570 Sten. Vikner (1997) ‘V-to-I Movement and Inflection for Person in all Tenses’ L. Haegemann (Eds) The New Comparative Syntax. Longman London 189–213 Vycichl Werner. (1957). ‘L’article défini du berbère’, in Mémorial André Basset, Adrien Maisonneuve, Paris, pp. 139–146