Agents of Reform?: Children’s Literature and Philosophy

Philosophia (United States) - 2007
Karen L. McGavock1
1School of Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

Tóm tắt

Children’s literature was first published in the eighteenth century at a time when the philosophical ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau on education and childhood were being discussed. Ironically, however, the first generation of children’s literature (by Maria Edgeworth et al) was incongruous with Rousseau’s ideas since the works were didactic, constraining and demanded passive acceptance from their readers. This instigated a deficit or reductionist model to represent childhood and children’s literature as simple and uncomplicated and led to children’s literature being overlooked and its contribution to philosophical discussions being undermined. Although Rousseau advocates freeing the child to develop, he does not feel that reading fiction promotes child development, which is a weakness in an otherwise strong argument for educational reform. Yet, rather ironically, the second generation of children’s writers, from Lewis Carroll onwards, more truly embraced Rousseau’s broader philosophical ideas on education and childhood than their predecessors, encouraging and freeing readers to imagine, reflect and actively engage in ontological enquiry. The emphasis had changed with the child being embraced in education and society as active participant rather than passive or disengaged recipient. Works deemed to be seminal to the canon of children’s literature such as Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Peter Pan and The Chronicles of Narnia challenge readers to work through conflicts many of which can be identified retrospectively as exhibiting postmodern characteristics. By exploring moral and spiritual dilemmas in their writing, Carroll, Barrie and Lewis’s works can be regarded as contributing to discussions on theodical postmodernism. The successes of The Lord of the Rings and Narnia films suggest that there is an interest in exploring moral dilemmas, fulfilling a need (perhaps for tolerance and understanding) in society at large. Children’s literature has an almost divine power to restore, to repair and to heal, all characteristics of theodical postmodernism but differing from the more widely held conception of postmodernism which pulls apart, exacerbates and exposes. Children’s literature therefore offers a healthy and constructive approach to working through moral dilemmas. In their deconstruction of childhood, these authors have brought children’s literature closer to aspects of enquiry traditionally found in the domain of adult mainstream literature. As the boundaries between childhood and adulthood become more fluid, less certain, debate is centring around whether the canon of children’s literature itself has become redundant or meaningless since there are no longer any restrictions on which subjects can be treated in children’s literature. Despite the fact that children’s literature clearly engages with difficult issues, it continues to be left out of the critical equation, not given serious attention, disregarded as simplistic and ignored in contemporary philosophical discussions concerning morality, postmodernism and the future of childhood. With children’s literature coming closer to mainstream literature, and exhibiting prominent features of postmodernism, however, it is only a matter of time before philosophical discussions actively engage with children’s literature and recognise its contribution to the resolution and reconciliation of ontological dilemmas. When this occurs, philosophy and children’s literature will re-engage, enriching contemporary investigations of existence, ethics and knowledge and fruitfully developing thought in these areas. This paper aims to contribute to this process.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anacker, G. J. (2005). Narnia and the moral imagination. In G. Bassham & J. L., Walls (Eds.), The chronicles of Narnia and philosophy: The lion, the witch, and the worldview (pp. 130–142). Illinois: Carus.

Baggett, D. (2004). Magic, Muggles and the moral imagination. In D. Baggett & S. E. Klein (Eds.), Harry Potter and philosophy: If Aristotle ran Hogwarts (pp. 158–172). Illinois: Carus.

Baker, B. M. (2001). Appointing the Canon. Rousseau’s Emile: Visions of the state, and education. Educational Theory, 51, 1–43, (Winter).

Barrie, J. M. (1928). Peter Pan or the boy who wouldn’t grow up. In Hollindale (ed.), (1995).

BBC News (2007), “Nursery Pupils Taught Philosophy”, 5 February 2007. Online at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/scotland/6330631.stm (last accessed: 8 February 2007).

Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. London: Penguin.

Burke, S. (1992). Death and the return of the author. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Carpenter, H. (1985). Alice and the mockery of God. In Secret gardens: A study of the golden age of children’s literature (pp. 44–70). London: Allen and Unwin.

Carroll, L. (1865). Alice’s adventures in wonderland. In Green (ed.) (1982).

Carroll, L. (1872). Through the looking glass. In Green (ed.) (1982).

Chapman, A. (1999). Uncanny epiphanies in the nineteenth-century sonnet tradition. In W. Tigges, (Ed.), Moments of Moment: Aspects of the literary epiphany, Studies in Literature 25, (pp. 115–135). Amsterdam: Rodopi

Dusinberre, J. (1999). Alice to the lighthouse: Children’s books and radical experiments in art. London: Macmillan.

Edgeworth, M., & Edgeworth, R. L. (1798). Practical education. Volume I, London, p. 336.

Egoff, S., Stubbs, G. T., & Ashley, L. F. (Eds.) (1969). Only connect: Readings on children’s literature. Oxford: OUP.

Gormley, B. (1998). C. S. Lewis: Christian and storyteller. Cambridge: Eerdmans.

Jasper, D. (1992). The study of literature and religion: An introduction. London: Macmillan.

Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. London: Routledge.

Kingsley, C. (1862). The water-babies. London: Ward, Lock and Company.

Krips, V. (1997). Imaginary childhoods: Memory and children’s literature. Critical Quarterly, pp. 42–49.

Lewis, C. S. (1951). Prince Caspian. London: Geoffrey Bles, Thirty-First Impression, September 1989.

Lewis, C. S. (1952). On three ways of writing for children. In Egoff et al (eds.) (1969).

Lewis, C. S. (1953). The silver chair. London: Macmillan, Thirty-First Impression, September 1989.

Lewis, C. S. (1955). Surprised by joy. London: Harper Collins.

Lewis, W. H. (ed.) (1966). Letters of C. S. Lewis. London: Geoffrey Bles.

MacDonald, G. (1872). The princess and the goblin. London: Strahan.

Matthews, G. B. (1980). Philosophy and the young child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Matthews, G. B. (2004). Finding platform 9 ¾: The idea of a different reality. In D. Baggett & S. E. Klein (eds.), Harry Potter and philosophy: If Aristotle ran Hogwarts (pp. 175–185). Illinois: Carus.

Mavor, C. (1996). Pleasures taken: Performances of sexuality and loss in Victorian photographs. North Carolina: Duke University Press.

McEwan, I. (1987). The child in time. London: Vintage.

Meilaender, G. (1998). The everyday C.S. Lewis. First things, 85 (pp. 27–33). August / September 1998,http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9808/articles/meilaender.html.

Morris, T. (2004). The courageous Harry Potter. In D. Baggett & S. E. Klein (eds.), Harry Potter and philosophy: If Aristotle ran Hogwarts (pp. 9–21). Illinois: Carus.

Pease, A. (2004). Aestheticism and aesthetic theory. In F.S. Roden (Ed.), Palgrave advances in Oscar Wilde studies (p. 111). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pullman, P. (2002). In A. Blake (Ed.), The irresistible rise of Harry Potter. London: Verso.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). Emile or on education. London: Dent.

Rowling, J. K. (1997). Harry Potter and the philosopher’s stone. London: Bloomsbury.

Rowling, J. K. (1998). Harry Potter and the chamber of secrets. London: Bloomsbury.

Rowling, J. K. (1999). Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban. London: Bloomsbury.

Rowling, J. K. (2000). Harry Potter and the goblet of fire. London: Bloomsbury.

Sherwood, M. M. (1818). The Fairchild family. London: John Hatchard.

Tolkien, J. R. R. (1964). Children and fairy stories. In S. Egoff et al. (eds.) (1969), Only connect: Readings on children’s literature. Oxford: OUP.

Walls, J. L. (2005). Narnia and the enchantment of philosophy. In G. Bassham & J. L. Walls (eds.). The chronicles of Narnia and philosophy: The lion, the witch, and the worldview (pp. 63–76). Illinois: Carus.

Walmsley, L. (ed.) (1999). The spirit of C. S. Lewis: A year of reading from his life and work. London: Harper Collins.

Wordsworth, W. (1815). Surprised by joy. In Allison; Barrows; Blake; Carr; Eastman and English (eds.) (1983), p. 560.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Philosophia (United States)

Thông tin tác giả