Agents, environments, scenarios: A framework for examining models and simulations of human-vehicle interaction

Christian P. Janssen1, Linda Ng Boyle2, Wendy Ju3, Andreas Riener4, Ignacio Alvarez5
1Utrecht University, Experimental Psychology and Helmholtz Institute, Heidelberglaan 1, Office H0.52, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands
2University of Washington, College of Engineering, Box 352650, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
3Cornell Tech, Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, 2 W Loop Rd, New York, NY 10044, United States of America
4Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Esplanade 10, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany
5Intel Corporation, Intel JF2-65, 2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro, OR 97124, United States of America

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alvarez, 2015, Skyline: a rapid prototyping driving simulator for user experience, 101 Alvarez, 2019, The skynivi experience: evoking startle and frustration in dyads and single drivers, 101 Anderson, 2002, Spanning seven orders of magnitude: a challenge for cognitive modeling, Cogn. Sci., 26, 85, 10.1207/s15516709cog2601_3 Anderson, 1991, Reflections of the environment in memory, Psychol. Sci., 2, 396, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00174.x Anderson, 2016, The discovery of processing stages: extension of sternberg’s method, Psychol. Rev., 123, 481, 10.1037/rev0000030 Baltodano, 2015, The rrads platform: a real road autonomous driving simulator, 281 Blaauw, 1982, Driving experience and task demands in simulator and instrumented car: a validation study, Hum. Factors, 24, 473, 10.1177/001872088202400408 Bolduc Boll, 2019, Users and automated driving systems: how will we interact with tomorrow’s vehicles? (Dagstuhl Seminar 19132), 9, 111 Brackstone, 1999, Dynamic behavioral data collection using an instrumented vehicle, Transp. Res. Rec., 1689, 9, 10.3141/1689-02 Brumby, 2011, Fast or safe? How performance objectives determine modality output choices while interacting on the move, 473 Brumby, 2018, Computational models of user multitasking Cañas, V., Sánchez, E., Botsch, M., Garcia, A., 2018. Wireless communication system for the validation of autonomous driving functions on full-scale vehicles, in: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), pp. 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVES.2018.8519492. Cruz-Neira, 1992, The cave: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment., Commun. ACM, 35, 64, 10.1145/129888.129892 Doric, 2016, A novel approach for researching crossing behavior and risk acceptance: the pedestrian simulator, 39 Doric, 2017, A novel approach for the test of active pedestrian safety systems, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 18, 1299, 10.1109/TITS.2016.2606439 Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., Koltun, V., 2017. Carla: An Open Urban Driving Simulator. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.03938. Eliasmith, 2013 Eoh, 2005, Electroencephalographic study of drowsiness in simulated driving with sleep deprivation, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 35, 307, 10.1016/j.ergon.2004.09.006 Faghri, 1999, Development of a computer simulation model of mixed motor vehicle and bicycle traffic on an urban road network, Transp. Res. Rec., 1674, 86, 10.3141/1674-12 Feuerstack, 2016, Theater-system technique and model-based attention prediction for the early automotive hmi design evaluation, 19 Forster, 2018, Calibration of trust expectancies in conditionally automated driving by brand, reliability information and introductionary videos: an online study, 118 Frey, 2016 Fridman, 2018, Cognitive load estimation in the wild, 652 Friedrich, 2008 Grace, 2018, When will ai exceed human performance? Evidence from ai experts, J. Artif. Intell. Res., 62, 729, 10.1613/jair.1.11222 Gray, 2011, Looming auditory collision warnings for driving, Hum. Factors, 53, 63, 10.1177/0018720810397833 Gunzelmann, 2011, Sleep loss and driver performance: quantitative predictions with zero free parameters, Cogn. Syst. Res., 12, 154, 10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.07.009 Harris Hoogendoorn, 2001, State-of-the-art of vehicular traffic flow modelling, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 215, 283 Janssen, 2012, Natural break points: the influence of priorities and cognitive and motor cues on dual-task interleaving, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6, 5, 10.1177/1555343411432339 Janssen, 2019, A hidden markov framework to capture human–machine interaction in automated vehicles, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1 Janssen, 2019, History and future of human-automation interaction, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 99, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.006 Janssen, 2019, The influence of rewards on (sub-) optimal interleaving, PLoS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0214027 Janssen, 2019, Interrupted by my car? Implications of interruption and interleaving research for automated vehicles, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130, 221, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.004 Jeon, 2015, Towards affect-integrated driving behaviour research, Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., 16, 553, 10.1080/1463922X.2015.1067934 John, 2004, Predictive human performance modeling made easy, 455 Jokinen, 2020, Multitasking in driving as optimal adaptation under uncertainty, Human Factors, 10.1177/0018720820927687 Kompass, 2015, Gesamthafte bewertung der sicherheitsveränderung durch fas/haf im verkehrssystem: Der beitrag von simulation, 45 Kühbeck, 2015 Kujala, 2015, Modeling visual sampling on in-car displays: the challenge of predicting safety-critical lapses of control, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 79, 66, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.02.009 Lahmer, 2018, Looming auditory collision warnings for semi-automated driving: an erp study, 310 Lee, 2019, Modeling microstructure of drivers’ task switching behavior, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 125, 104, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.12.007 Lewis, 2014, Computational rationality: linking mechanism and behavior through bounded utility maximization, Top. Cogn. Sci., 6, 279, 10.1111/tops.12086 Liu, 2006, Queueing network-model human processor (qn-mhp) a computational architecture for multitask performance in human-machine systems, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 13, 37, 10.1145/1143518.1143520 MacKenzie, 1992, Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction, Human-computer interaction, 7, 91, 10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3 Madrigal Mahadevan, 2018, Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction, 429 Marr, 1982 Martin, 2013, A review of alcohol-impaired driving: the role of blood alcohol concentration and complexity of the driving task, J. Forensic Sci., 58, 1238, 10.1111/1556-4029.12227 Math, 2012, Opends: a new open-source driving simulator for research, 7 McCarthy, 2006, A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955, AI Mag., 27, 12 McClelland, 2009, The place of modeling in cognitive science, Top. Cogn. Sci., 1, 11, 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01003.x Mok, 2015 Newell, 1990 Oulasvirta, 2019, It’s time to rediscover hci models, Interactions, 26, 52, 10.1145/3330340 Peebles, 2015, Thirty years after marr’s vision: levels of analysis in cognitive science, Top. Cogn. Sci., 7, 187, 10.1111/tops.12137 Pfeifer, 2001 Riener, 2010, Assessment of simulator fidelity and validity in simulator and on-the-road studies, International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements, 3, 110 Riener, 2016, Automotive user interfaces in the age of automation (Dagstuhl seminar 16262) Riener, 2016, A flexible mixed reality test environment to improve simulation-based testing for highly automated driving, 18 Rothenbücher, 2016, Ghost driver: a field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles, 795 Russell, 2003 SAE International Salvucci, 2011 Salvucci, 2005, Distract-r: rapid prototyping and evaluation of in-vehicle interfaces, 581 Schieben, 2009, The theater-system technique: agile designing and testing of system behavior and interaction, applied to highly automated vehicles, 43 Schindler, 2013, A collaborative approach for the preparation of co-operative multi-user driving scenarios, Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme, 10, 12 Schuldt, 2015, Eine methode für die zuordnung von testfällen für automatisierte fahrfunktionen auf x-in-the-loop simulationen im modularen virtuellen testbaukasten, vol. 10 Spies, 2006, Automobile lidar sensorik: stand, trends und zukünftige herausforderungen, Advances in Radio Science, Kleinheubacher Berichte, 4, 99, 10.5194/ars-4-99-2006 Stanley Robotics The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine Thimbleby, 2007 Turing, 1950, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, 59 Udrive Consortium van der Heiden, 2019, Visual in-car warnings: how fast do drivers respond?, Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 65, 748, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.024 Veldstra, 2012, Effects of alcohol (bac 0.5‰) and ecstasy (mdma 100 mg) on simulated driving performance and traffic safety, Psychopharmacology, 222, 377, 10.1007/s00213-011-2537-4 Victor, 2017, When autonomous vehicles are introduced on a larger scale in the road transport system: the drive me project, 541 Wang, 2010, The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: a comparison with field testing, Ergonomics, 53, 404, 10.1080/00140130903464358 Wester, 2010, Effects of alcohol on attention orienting and dual-task performance during simulated driving: an event-related potential study, J. Psychopharmacol., 24, 1333, 10.1177/0269881109348168 Wickens, 2008, Multiple resources and mental workload, Hum. Factors, 50, 449, 10.1518/001872008X288394 Zafiroglu, 2012, Navigation to multiple local transportation futures: cross-interrogating remembered and recorded drives, 139 Zhang, 2014, Understanding multitasking through parallelized strategy exploration and individualized cognitive modeling, 3885