Agent-based modelling of post-disaster recovery with remote sensing data

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction - Tập 60 - Trang 102285 - 2021
Saman Ghaffarian1, Debraj Roy2, Tatiana Filatova2,3, N. Kerle1
1Department of Earth System Analysis (ESA), Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands
2Department of Governance and Technology for Sustainability, University of Twente Drienerlolaan, 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, the Netherlands
3PERSWADE Research Center, School of Information, Systems and Modeling, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2015

2018

Bank, 2017

2015, In Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015 - 2030, 1

Brundiers, 2018, Leveraging post-disaster windows of opportunities for change towards sustainability: a framework, Sustainability, 10, 1390, 10.3390/su10051390

Alcayna, 2016, Resilience and disaster trends in the Philippines: opportunities for national and local capacity building, PLOS Currents Disasters, 10.1371/currents.dis.4a0bc960866e53bd6357ac135d740846

Bank, 2018

Brown, 2010

MCDEM, 2005

Ghaffarian, 2019, Post-disaster recovery assessment using multi-temporal satellite images with a deep learning approach

Ghaffarian, 2018, Remote sensing-based proxies for urban disaster risk management and resilience: a review, Rem. Sens., 10, 1760, 10.3390/rs10111760

Kerle, 2019, Evaluating resilience-centered development interventions with remote sensing, Rem. Sens., 11, 2511, 10.3390/rs11212511

Sheykhmousa, 2019, Post-disaster recovery assessment with machine learning-derived land cover and land use information, Rem. Sens., 11, 1174, 10.3390/rs11101174

Fiedrich, 2007, Agent-based systems for disaster management, Commun. ACM, 50, 41, 10.1145/1226736.1226763

Tesfatsion, 2005

Wooldridge, 2009

Farmer, 2009, The economy needs agent-based modelling, Nature, 460, 685, 10.1038/460685a

Ghaffarian, 2019, Towards post-disaster debris identification for precise damage and recovery assessments from uav and satellite images, Int. Arch. Photogram. Rem. Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W13, 297, 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-297-2019

Kerle, 2019, Uav-based structural damage mapping: a review, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9, 14, 10.3390/ijgi9010014

Burton, 2011, Evaluating post-katrina recovery in Mississippi using repeat photography, Disasters, 35, 488, 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01227.x

Wagner, 2012, Geospatial assessment of recovery rates following a tornado disaster, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 50, 4313, 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2191973

Duarte, 2018, Multi-resolution feature fusion for image classification of building damages with convolutional neural networks, Rem. Sens., 10, 1636, 10.3390/rs10101636

Vetrivel, 2015, Identification of damage in buildings based on gaps in 3d point clouds from very high resolution oblique airborne images, ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens., 105, 61, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.016

Ghaffarian, 2019, Post-disaster building database updating using automated deep learning: an integration of pre-disaster openstreetmap and multi-temporal satellite data, Rem. Sens., 11, 2427, 10.3390/rs11202427

Ghaffarian, 2020, Post-disaster recovery monitoring with google earth engine, Appl. Sci., 10, 4574, 10.3390/app10134574

Vetrivel, 2018, Disaster damage detection through synergistic use of deep learning and 3d point cloud features derived from very high resolution oblique aerial images, and multiple-kernel-learning, ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens., 140, 45, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.03.001

Vetrivel, 2016, Identification of structurally damaged areas in airborne oblique images using a visual-bag-of-words approach, Rem. Sens., 8, 231, 10.3390/rs8030231

An, 2012, Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: review of agent-based models, Ecol. Model., 229, 25, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010

Filatova, 2014, Market-based instruments for flood risk management: a review of theory, practice and perspectives for climate adaptation policy, Environ. Sci. Pol., 37, 227, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.005

Filatova, 2011, Coastal risk management: how to motivate individual economic decisions to lower flood risk?, Ocean Coast Manag., 54, 164, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.028

Mehvar, 2019, A practical framework of quantifying climate change-driven environmental losses (quanticel) in coastal areas in developing countries, Environ. Sci. Pol., 101, 302, 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.007

Watts, 2019, Conceptualizing and implementing an agent-based model of information flow and decision making during hurricane threats, Environ. Model. Software, 122, 104524, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104524

Burger, 2019, Computational social science of disasters: opportunities and challenges, Future Internet, 11, 103, 10.3390/fi11050103

Dawson, 2011, An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management, Nat. Hazards, 59, 167, 10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4

Abebe, 2019, A coupled flood-agent-institution modelling (claim) framework for urban flood risk management, Environ. Model. Software, 111, 483, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.015

Chen, 2008, Agent-based modeling and simulation of urban evacuation: relative effectiveness of simultaneous and staged evacuation strategies, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 59, 25, 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602321

Wang, 2016, An agent-based model of a multimodal near-field tsunami evacuation: decision-making and life safety, Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 64, 86, 10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.010

McNamara, 2013, A coupled physical and economic model of the response of coastal real estate to climate risk, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 559, 10.1038/nclimate1826

Grinberger, 2016, Dynamic agent based simulation of welfare effects of urban disasters, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 59, 129, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.06.005

Markhvida, 2020, Quantification of disaster impacts through household well-being losses, Nature Sustainability, 3, 538, 10.1038/s41893-020-0508-7

Eid, 2015, Optimizing disaster recovery strategies using agent-based simulation, 379

Sun, 2019, Agent-based recovery model for seismic resilience evaluation of electrified communities, Risk Anal., 39, 1597, 10.1111/risa.13277

Mishra, 2018, Current trends in disaster management simulation modelling research, Ann. Oper. Res., 283, 1387, 10.1007/s10479-018-2985-x

Taylor, 2015, 81

Boston, 2014, In towards assessing the resilience of a community in seismic events using agent based modeling

Nejat, 2012, Agent-based modeling of behavioral housing recovery following disasters, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 27, 748, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00787.x

Kanno, 2018, Human-centered modeling framework of multiple interdependency in urban systems for simulation of post-disaster recovery processes, Cognit. Technol. Work, 21, 301, 10.1007/s10111-018-0510-2

Fan, 2019, An agent-based model approach for assessing tourist recovery strategies after an earthquake: a case study of jiuzhai valley, Tourism Manag., 75, 307, 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.05.013

Coates, 2019, Agent-based modeling and simulation to assess flood preparedness and recovery of manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 78, 195, 10.1016/j.engappai.2018.11.010

Eid, 2017, Sustainable disaster recovery: multiagent-based model for integrating environmental vulnerability into decision-making processes of the associated stakeholders, J. Urban Plann. Dev., 143, 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000349

Moradi, 2020, Recovus: an agent-based model of post-disaster household recovery, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat., 23, 13, 10.18564/jasss.4445

Robinson, 2007, Comparison of empirical methods for building agent-based models in land use science, J. Land Use Sci., 2, 31, 10.1080/17474230701201349

Heppenstall, 2021, Future developments in geographical agent-based models: challenges and opportunities, Geogr. Anal., 53, 76, 10.1111/gean.12267

Mori, 2014, Local amplification of storm surge by super typhoon haiyan in leyte gulf, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 5106, 10.1002/2014GL060689

Ching, 2015, E., T. An assessment of disaster-related mortality post-haiyan in tacloban city, Western Pac Surveill Response J, 6

Chen, 2016, Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system, 785

Müller, 2013, Describing human decisions in agent-based models – odd + d, an extension of the odd protocol, Environ. Model. Software, 48, 37, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.003

McPherson, 2001, Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks, Annu. Rev. Sociol., 27, 415, 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

Roy, 2020, Understanding resilience in slums using an agent-based model, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 80, 101458, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101458

Windrum, 2007, Empirical validation of agent-based models: alternatives and prospects, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat., 10, 8

Glasser, 1999

Alonso, 1964

Meikle, 2001, Sustainable urban livelihoods: concepts and implications for policy

Lancaster, 1966, A new approach to consumer theory, J. Polit. Econ., 74, 132, 10.1086/259131

Shughrue, 2013, A model of nonlinear urbanization and information flows across India, Hixon Center for Urban Ecology, 1, 1

Ben-Akiva, 1999, Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions, 5

Lu, 2017, Chapter 10 - interorganizational network dynamics in the wenchuan earthquake recovery, 143

Oldenburg, 1982, The third place, Qual. Sociol., 5, 265, 10.1007/BF00986754

Bandyopadhyay, 2011

Jackson, 2012, Social capital and social quilts: network patterns of favor exchange, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 1857, 10.1257/aer.102.5.1857

Wasserman, 1994

Jackson, 2007, Meeting strangers and friends of friends: how random are social networks?, Am. Econ. Rev., 97, 890, 10.1257/aer.97.3.890

Chierchia, 2015, The impact of perceived similarity on tacit coordination: propensity for matching and aversion to decoupling choices, Front. Behav. Neurosci., 9, 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00202

Centola, 2005, The emperor's dilemma: a computational model of self‐enforcing norms, Am. J. Sociol., 110, 1009, 10.1086/427321