Agency in action: Towards a transactional approach for analyzing agency in sustainability transitions
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aldrich, 2008, From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior, J. Occup. Sci., 15, 147, 10.1080/14427591.2008.9686624
Andersson, 2022, Applications of Transactional Methodologies for Analysis of Teaching and Learning Processes, 87
Archer, 1995
Becker, 2021, The role of social identity in institutional work for sociotechnical transitions: The case of transport infrastructure in Berlin, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 162
Bennett, 2013, Habit and habituation: Governance and the social, Body & Society, 19, 3, 10.1177/1357034X13485881
Boenink, 2020, Values in responsible research and innovation: from entities to practices, J. Respons. Innov., 7, 450, 10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451
Bourdieu, 1972
Bröckling, 2010, From Foucault's lectures at the Collège de France to studies of governmentality: An introduction, 9
Città, 2019, Analyzing creativity in the light of social practice theory, Front. Psychol., 9, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02752
Correljé, 2022, Understanding Value Change in the Energy Transition: Exploring the Perspective of Original Institutional Economics, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 28, 55, 10.1007/s11948-022-00403-3
Cutchin, 2012, Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude, 21
Dewey, 1949
Diaz, 2013, Green tides in Brittany: What can we learn about niche–regime interactions?, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 8, 62, 10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.002
European Commission. (2023). Right to Repair: Commission introduces new consumer rights for easy and attractive repairs. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1794.
Fuenfschilling, 2014, The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Research Policy, 43, 772, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
Garrison, 2022
Garud, 2007, Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue, Organ. Stud., 28, 957, 10.1177/0170840607078958
Geels, 2005, Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 72, 681, 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014
Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
Geels, 2020, Micro-foundations of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: Developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics and neo-institutional theory, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 152
Giddens, 1984
Gram-Hanssen, 2010, Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach, J. Ind. Ecol., 14, 150, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00194.x
Hampel, 2017, Institutional Work: Taking stock and making it matter, 558
Hoffman, 2016, Exploring the micro-politics in transitions from a practice perspective: The case of greenhouse innovation in the Netherlands, J. Environ. Plann. Policy Manage., 18, 692, 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1113514
Huttunen, 2021, Pluralising agency to understand behaviour change in sustainability transitions, Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 76
Jalas, 2016, Stacking wood and staying warm: Time, temporality and housework around domestic heating systems, J. Consum. Cult., 16, 43, 10.1177/1469540513509639
Joas, 1996
Keller, 2022, Connecting the multi-level-perspective and social practice approach for sustainable transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 44, 14, 10.1016/j.eist.2022.05.004
Kenis, 2019, Post-politics contested: Why multiple voices on climate change do not equal politicisation, Environ. Plan. C Pol. Space, 37, 831
Köhler, 2019, An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 31, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
Kok, 2021, Politics of complexity: Conceptualizing agency, power and powering in the transitional dynamics of complex adaptive systems, Research Policy, 50, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104183
Lawrence, 2006, Institutions and institutional work, 215
Lidar, 2006, Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers' epistemological moves and students' practical epistemology, Sci. Edu., 90, 148, 10.1002/sce.20092
Luederitz, 2017, Learning through evaluation–A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments, J. Cleaner Prod., 169, 61, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005
Martiskainen, 2021, Mixed feelings: A review and research agenda for emotions in sustainability transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 40, 609, 10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.023
Muhit, 2013, Notion of experience in John Dewey s philosophy, Philosophy and Progress, 9
North, 1990
Östman, 2022, A transactional methodology for analysing learning, Mind Cult. Act., 1, 10.1080/10749039.2022.2042029
Pesch, 2015, Tracing discursive space: Agency and change in sustainability transitions, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 90, 379, 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.009
Pedwell, 2017, Transforming habit: Revolution, routine and social change, Cult. Stud., 31, 93, 10.1080/09502386.2016.1206134
Plummer, 2020, Exploring the role of learning in sustainability transitions: a case study using a novel analytical approach, Environ. Edu. Res., 27, 418, 10.1080/13504622.2020.1857703
Rauschmayer, 2015, Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions—Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices, Ecol. Econ., 109, 211, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018
Reckwitz, 2002, Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing, Eur. J. Soc. Theo., 5, 243, 10.1177/13684310222225432
Ryan, 2011
Schatzki, 2002
Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manage., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651
Shilling, 2008
Shilling, 2021, Body pedagogics, transactionalism and vélo identities: Becoming a cyclist in motorised societies, Sociol. Rev., 70, 3, 10.1177/00380261211049037
Shilling, 2022, Body pedagogics, culture and the transactional case of vélo worlds, Eur. J. Soc. Theo., 25, 312, 10.1177/1368431021996642
Smith, 2007, Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 19, 427, 10.1080/09537320701403334
Smith, 2005, The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions, Research Policy, 34, 1491, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
Smith, 2010, Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges, Research Policy, 39, 435, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
Sovacool, 2017, Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change, Soc. Stud. Sci., 47, 703, 10.1177/0306312717709363
Sutherland, 2015
Upham, 2018, Agency and structure in a sociotechnical transition: Hydrogen fuel cells, conjunctural knowledge and structuration in Europe, Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 37, 163, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.040
Thornton, 1999, Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990, Am. J. Sociol., 105, 801, 10.1086/210361
Tolbert, 1996, The institutionalization of Institutional Theory, 175
Van Poeck, 2021, Learning to find a way out of non-sustainable systems, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 39, 155, 10.1016/j.eist.2021.04.001
Warde, 2005, Consumption and theories of practice, J. Consum. Cult., 5, 131, 10.1177/1469540505053090
Weik, 2012, Introducing “the creativity of action” into institutionalist theory, Management, 15, 564
Welch, 2018, The practices of collective action: Practice theory, sustainability transitions and social change, J. Theo. Soc. Behav., 48, 288, 10.1111/jtsb.12168
Wertsch, 1998
Wickman, 2002, Learning as discourse change: a sociocultural mechanism, Sci. Edu., 86, 601, 10.1002/sce.10036
