After the Velvet Revolutions: Altered Life-Chances, Fragile Legitimacy, and Split-Consciousness in Post-Communist Eastern Europe
Tóm tắt
This article deals with (i) changes in the objective and subjective life-chances of people in Eastern Europe as affected by the transformation of their economic and political systems, and (ii) the emergence of a new dominant meritocratic ideology of distributive justice and the survival of a now old subordinate egalitarian one. We investigate whether, and if so, how and to what degree, changes in people's (perceived) life-chances influence their (de)legitimation of the market economy and the pluralistic system of democracy as well as their (de/re)legitimation of the ancien regime. Especially, the question of whether, and if so, how and under which conditions, a phenomenon that has been called “split-consciousness” will occur with respect to people's choices between those opposing systems is answered. Several hypotheses are presented that deal with the above mentioned topics. The hypotheses are tested empirically by using cross-national data stemming from the International Social Justice Project.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abercrombie, N., and Turner, B. S. (1978). The dominant ideology thesis. Br. J. Sociol. 29: 149–170.
Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., and Turner, B. S. (1980). The Dominant Ideology Thesis, Allen & Unwin, London.
Andorka, R., Headey, B., and Krause, P. (1995). Economic and political imperatives in system transformation: Hungary and East Germany 1990–1994. Rev. Sociol. 60 (Special Issue): 1–26.
Arts, W., Hermkens, P., and Van Wijck, P. (1995). Anomie, distributive justice and dissatisfaction with material well-being in Eastern Europe. A comparative study. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 36: 1–16.
Bartlett, R. (1993). The Making of Europe. Conquest, Colonization and Cultural Change 950–1350. Allen Lane, London.
The Economist. (1992). Schools brief: Democracy in Eastern Europe & Capitalism or bust. February 1, pp. 30–31; February 8, pp. 29–30.
The Economist. (1993). Rejoined: A survey of Eastern Europe. March 13, pp. 1–22.
The Economist. (1995). The return of the Habsburgs: A survey of Central Europe. November 18, pp. 1–28.
Headey, B., Andorka, R., and Krause, P. (1995a). Political legitimacy versus economic imperatives in system transformation: Hungary and East Germany 1990–93. Soc. Indicators Res. 36: 247–273.
Headey, B., Jrause, P., and Habich, R. (1995b). East Germany: Rising incomes, unchanged inequality and the impact of redistributive government 1990–92. Br. J. Sociol. 46: 225–243.
Hochschild, J. (1981). What's Fair? American Beliefs About Distributive Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Huntington, S. P. (1997). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon & Schuster, London.
International Social Justice Project. (1993). Codebook and Documentation, University of Michigan, Institute of Social Research, Ann Arbor.
Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., and Wegener, B. (eds.). (1995). Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, Aldine de Gruyter, Berlin
Kluegel, J. R., and Mateju, P. (1995). Egalitarian vs. inegalitarian principles of distributive justice. In Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., and Wegener, B. (eds.), Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 209–238.
Kluegel, J. R., and Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs About Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought To Be, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Lindenberg, S. (1983). Utility and morality. Kyklos, 36: 450–468.
Mason, D. S. (1995). Justice, socialism, and participation in the postcommunist states. In Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., and Wegener, B. (eds.), Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, de Gruyter, New York, pp. 131–149.
Mason, D. S., Orkeny, A., and Sidorenko-Stephenson, S. (1997). Increasingly fond memories of a grim past. Transition 3: 15–19.
Mateju, P. (1992). Perceptions of changing inequality in post-communist Czechoslovakia. In Workshop Transformation Processes in Eastern-Europe, NWO/SRO/SSCW, The Hague, pp. 107–127.
Mateju, P. (1995). In search of explanations for recent left-turns in post-communist countries. Int. Rev. Comp. Public Policy 7: 43–82.
Mateju, P. (1996). Subjective mobility and perception of life-chances in Eastern Europe. In Working Papers, Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, No. 5.
Mateju, P. (1998). Who votes left after the fall of communism? Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 39.
Mateju, P., and Lim, N. (1995). Who has gotten ahead after the fall of Communism? The case of the Czech Republic. Czech Sociol. Rev., 117–136.
Mateju, P., and Rehakova, B. (1996). Turning Left or Class Realignment? Analysis of the changing relationships between class and party in the Czech Republic, 1992–1996. In Working Papers, Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, No. 5.
Parkin, F. (1972). Class Inequality and Political Order, Paladin, London.
Pejovich, S. (1993). Institutions, nationalism, and the transition process in Eastern Europe. Soc. Philos. Soc. Policy 10: 65–78.
Pipes, R. (1974). Russia Under the Old Regime, Weidenfeld & Micholson, London.
Srubar, I. (1994). Variants of the transformation process in Central Europe. A comparative assessment. Z. Soziol. 23, 198–221.
Sztompka, P. (1996). Looking back: The year 1989 as a cultural and civilization break. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 1: 115–129.
Wegener, B. (1992). Gerechtigkeitsforschung und legitimationsnormen. Z. Soziol. 21: 269–283.
Wegener, B., and Liebig, S. (1995). Dominant ideologies and the variation of distributive justice norms: A comparison of East and West Germany, and the United States. In Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., and Wegener, B. (eds.), Social Justice and Political Change. Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post—Communist States, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 239–259.
World Bank. (1996). From Plan to Market. World Development Report 1996, Oxford University Press, Oxford.