Affective and psycholinguistic norms for German conceptual metaphors (COMETA)

Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389–410.

Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). The power of emotional valence—from cognitive to affective processes in reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192

Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00559

Bambini, V., Canal, P., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M. (2019). Time course and neurophysiological underpinnings of metaphor in literary context. Discourse Processes, 56, 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1401876

Bambini, V., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M. (2014). A dataset of metaphors from the Italian literature: Exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context. PLoS ONE, 9, e105634.

Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language—A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669–2683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021

Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermueller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn217

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Simuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical Report C-1). Gainesville, FL:

Cacciari, C. (2014). Processing multiword idiomatic strings: many words in one? The Mental Lexicon, 9, 267-293.

Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004

Cardillo, E. R., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Stimulus design in and obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 651–664. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.651

Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Stimulus needs are a moving target: 240 additional matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 471–483. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0717-1

Carston, R. (2018). Figurative language, mental imagery, and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol, 33, 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1481257

Citron, F. M. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.007

Citron, F. M. M., Cacciari, C., Funcke, J., Hsu, C.-T., & Jacobs, A. M. (2019). Idiomatic expressions evoke stronger emotional responses in the brain than literal sentences. Neuropsychologia, 131, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.020

Citron, F. M. M., Cacciari, C., Kucharski, M., Beck, L., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2016a). When emotions are expressed figuratively: Psycholinguistic and affective norms of 619 idioms for German (PANIG). Behavior Research Methods, 48, 91–111. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0581-4

Citron, F. M. M., & Goldberg, A. E. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2585–2595. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00654

Citron, F. M. M., Güsten, J., Michaelis, N., & Goldberg, A. E. (2016b). Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response. NeuroImage, 139, 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020

Citron, F. M. M., Weekes, B. S., & Ferstl, E. C. (2014). How are affective word ratings related to lexico-semantic properties? Evidence from the Sussex Affective Word List (SAWL). Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000409

Delaney-Busch, N., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Friendly drug dealers and terrifying puppies: affective primacy can attenuate the N400 effect in emotional discourse contexts. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 473–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0159-5

Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). A piece of action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage, 83, 862–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.044

Diaz-Lago, M., Fraga, I., & Acuna-Farina, C. (2015). Time course of gender agreement violations containing emotional words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 36, 79–93.

Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35, 398–417.

Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 495–522.

Eilola, T. M., & Havelka, J. (2010). Affective norms for 210 British English and Finnish nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.134

Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 239–250.

Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 724–739.

Forgács, B., Bohrn, I. C., Baudewig, J., Hofmann, M. J., Csaba, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words. NeuroImage, 63, 1432–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029

Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48, 529–562.

Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (1989). How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special.” Metaphor and Symbol, 4, 145–158.

Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories—quickly. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hamann, S., & Mao, H. (2002). Positive and negative emotional verbal stimuli elicit activity in the left amygdala. NeuroReport, 13, 15–19.

Herbert, C., Ethofer, T., Anders, S., Junghofer, M., Wildgruber, D., Grodd, W., & Kissler, J. (2009). Amygdala activation during reading of emotional adjectives—An advantage for pleasant content. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn027

Hinojosa, J. A., Martínez-García, N., Villalba-García, C., Fernández-Folgueiras, U., Sánchez-Carmona, A., Pozo, M. A., & Montoro, P. R. (2016). Affective norms of 875 Spanish words for five discrete emotional categories and two emotional dimensions. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 272–284. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0572-5

Horton, W. S. (2007). Metaphor and reader’s attribution of intimacy. Memory & Cognition, 35, 87–94.

Horton, W. S. (2013). Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 148–166.

Hsu, C.-T., Jacobs, A. M., Citron, F. M. M., & Conrad, M. (2015). The emotion potential of words and passages in reading Harry Potter—An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 142, 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.011

Joffe, V. L., Cain, K., & Marić, N. (2009). Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: does mental imagery training help? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820601084402

Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z. (2006). Roosters, robins, and alarm clocks: Aptness and conventionality in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.004

Katz, A. N., Paivio, A., Marschark, M., & Clark, J. M. (1988). Norms for 204 literary and 260 nonliterary metaphors on 10 psychological dimensions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3, 191–214.

Keysar, B., & Glucksberg, S. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3

Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1, 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446

Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007

Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669

Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.016

Lai, V. T., Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Feel between the lines: Implied emotion in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00798

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical Report No. A-4). Gainsville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.

Liu, P. (2018). Embodied-linguistic conceptual representations during metaphor processing. Doctoral thesis, Lancaster University, UK.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407.

Montefinese, M., Ambrosini, E., Fairfield, B., & Mammarella, N. (2013). The adaptation of the affective norms for English words (ANEW) for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 887–903. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0405-3

Nasrallah, M., Carmel, D., & Lavie, N. (2009). Murder, she wrote: Enhanced sensitivity to negative word valence. Emotion, 9, 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016350

Ortony, A., & Fainsilber, L. (1987, January). The role of metaphors in descriptions of emotions. Paper presented at the 1987 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, Las Cruces, NM.

Ortony, A., Schallert, D., Reynolds, R., & Antos, S. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17, 465–477.

Pierce, R. S., & Chiappe, D. L. (2009). The roles of aptness, conventionality, and working memory in the production of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802568422

Pomp, J., Bestgen, A.-K., Schulze, P., Müller, C. J., Citron, F. M. M., Suchan, B., & Kuchinke, L. (2018). Lexical olfaction recruits olfactory orbitofrontal cortex in metaphorical and literal contexts. Brain and Language, 179, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.02.001

Prandi, M. (2010). Typology of metaphors: Implications for translation. Mutatis Mutandis, 3, 304–332.

Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padrón, I., & Comesaña, M. (2007). The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (Affective Norms for English Words). Behavior Research Methods, 39, 600–605. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193031

Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., & Davies, R. A. I. (2019). The graded effect of valence on word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 851–868.

Rojo, A., Ramos, M., & Valenzuela, J. (2014). The emotional impact of translation: A heart rate study. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.006

Roncero, C., de Almeida, R. G., Martin, D. C., & de Caro, M. (2016). Aptness predicts metaphor preference in the lab and on the internet. Metaphor and Symbol, 31, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1116908

Schmidtke, D. S., Schröder, T., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2014). ANGST: Affective norms for German sentiment terms, derived from the Affective Norms for English Words. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0426-y

Thibodeau, P., & Durgin, F. H. (2008). Productive figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.001

Thibodeau, P. H., & Durgin, F. H. (2011). Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.583196

Thibodeau, P. H., Sikos, L., & Durgin, F. H. (2018). Are subjective ratings of metaphors a red herring? The big two dimensions of metaphoric sentences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 759–772. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0903-9

Vinson, D. P., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). How does emotional content affect lexical processing? Cognition and Emotion, 28, 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.851068

Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41, 534–538. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.534

Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language, 21, 404–433.

Winter, B. (2016). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1193619