Advocacy coalitions and policy change for decarbonisation of international maritime transport: The case of FuelEU maritime

Adland, 2018, The energy efficiency effects of periodic ship hull cleaning, J. Clean. Prod., 178, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.247 Anderson, 2006, Analytic autoethnography, J. Contemp. Ethnogr., 35, 373, 10.1177/0891241605280449 Ardiç, 2015, Non-implementation of road pricing policy in the Netherlands: an application of the ‘Advocacy Coalition Framework, Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res., 15 Bach, 2020, Implementing maritime battery-electric and hydrogen solutions: a technological innovation systems analysis, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 87, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102492 Balcombe, 2019, How to decarbonise international shipping: options for fuels, technologies and policies, Energy Convers. Manag., 182, 72, 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080 Bandelow, 2017, Learning as a necessary but not sufficient condition for major health policy change: a qualitative comparative analysis combining ACF and MSF, J. Comp. Policy Anal. Res. Pract., 21, 167, 10.1080/13876988.2017.1393920 Bergek, 2021, Sustainability transitions in coastal shipping: the role of regime segmentation, Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., 12 Bergh, 2020 Bows-Larkin, 2014, All adrift: aviation, shipping, and climate change policy, Clim. Policy, 15, 681, 10.1080/14693062.2014.965125 Brandsma, 2015, Co-decision after Lisbon: the politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking, Eur. Union Politics, 16, 300, 10.1177/1465116515584497 Bullock, 2020, Shipping and the Paris climate agreement: a focus on committed emissions, BCM Energy, 2, 5 Bullock, 2022, The urgent case for stronger climate targets for international shipping, Clim. Policy, 22, 301, 10.1080/14693062.2021.1991876 Christodoulou, 2022, Potential alternative fuel pathways for compliance with the ‘FuelEU Maritime Initiative’, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 112, 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103492 Cullinane, 2022, Evaluating the costs of decarbonizing the shipping industry: a review of the literature, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10, 946, 10.3390/jmse10070946 Dewulf, 2012, Issue framing in conversations for change: discursive interaction strategies for “doing differences”, J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 48, 168, 10.1177/0021886312438858 Douglas, 1982 EC (2021a) Commission staff working document. Impact assessment Accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, SWD(2021) 635 final, Brussels, European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2021:0635:FIN:EN:PDF. EC (2021b) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport and amending Directive 2009/16/EC, COM(2021) 562 final, Brussels, European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0562&qid=1632150729354. 2013 2019 2020 2021 Elgström, 2011, Negotiation in the European Union: bargaining or problem-solving?, J. Eur. Public Policy, 7, 684, 10.1080/13501760010014902 Gabehart, 2022, Lessons from the Advocacy Coalition Framework for climate change policy and politics, Clim. Act., 1, 13, 10.1007/s44168-022-00014-5 Gritsenko, 2017, Regulating GHG emissions from shipping: local, global, or polycentric approach?, Mar. Policy, 84, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.010 Gronow, 2020, Explaining collaboration in consensual and conflictual governance networks, Public Adm., 98, 730, 10.1111/padm.12641 Häge, 2013, The effect of codecision on council decision-making: informalization, politicization and power, J. Eur. Public Policy, 20, 953, 10.1080/13501763.2013.795372 Heikkila, 2018, Comparison of theories of the policy process, 301 Heikkila, 2014, Understanding a period of policy change: the case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado, Rev. Policy Res., 31, 65, 10.1111/ropr.12058 Heisenberg, 2008, How should we best study the Council of Ministers?, 261 Hellsmark, 2016, Innovation system strengths and weaknesses in progressing sustainable technology: the case of Swedish biorefinery development, J. Clean. Prod., 131, 702, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.109 IMO (2020) Fourth IMO GHG study, London: international maritime organisation. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Fourth-IMO-Greenhouse-Gas-Study-2020.aspx. Jenkins-Smith, 2014, The advocacy coalition framework: foundations, evolution, and ongoing research, 183 Jenkins-Smith, 2018, The advocacy coalition framework: an overview of the research programme, 135 Jenkins-Smith, 1990 Joung, 2020, The IMO initial strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050, J. int. marit. saf. environ. aff. shipp, 4, 1 Kindler, 1988 König, 2008, Veto player theory and consensus behaviour, 81 Kukkonen, 2017, Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States, Public Adm., 95, 713, 10.1111/padm.12321 Lagouvardou, 2020, A literature survey on market-based measures for the decarbonization of shipping, Sustainability, 12, 10.3390/su12103953 Lasswell, 1959 Law, 2021, A comparison of alternative fuels for shipping in terms of lifecycle energy and cost, Energies, 14, 8502, 10.3390/en14248502 Lin, 2021, Evaluation of green strategies in maritime liner shipping using evolutionary game theory, J. Clean. Prod., 279, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123268 Mäkitie, 2022, Norwegian ship-owners’ adoption of alternative fuels, Energy Policy, 163, 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112869 Mander, 2017, Slow steaming and a new dawn for wind propulsion: a multi-level analysis of two low carbon shipping transitions, Mar. Policy, 75, 210, 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.018 March, 1998, The institutional dynamics of international political orders, Int. Organ., 52, 943, 10.1162/002081898550699 Metz, 2021, Policy change through negotiated agreements: the case of greening Swiss agricultural policy, Policy Stud. J., 49, 731, 10.1111/psj.12417 Naurin, 2008, Introduction: from rags to riches, 1 Pettit, 2018, Revisiting history: can shipping achieve a second socio-technical transition for carbon emissions reduction?, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 58, 292, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.001 Pierce, 2017, There and back again: a tale of the advocacy coalition framework, Policy Stud. J., 45, S13, 10.1111/psj.12197 Pierce, 2020, Policy change: an advocacy coalition framework perspective, Policy Stud. J., 48, 64, 10.1111/psj.12223 Poljak, 2018, Advocacy coalitions in transport policy: a case of rail sector in Croatia, Cent. Eur. J. Public Policy, 12, 41, 10.2478/cejpp-2018-0002 Poulsen, 2020, A swift turnaround? abating shipping greenhouse gas emissions via port call optimization, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 86, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102460 Poulsen, 2021, The potential and limits of environmental disclosure regulation: a global value chain perspective applied to tanker shipping, Glob. Environ. Politics, 21, 99, 10.1162/glep_a_00586 Prehn, 2021, Climate strategy in the balance who decides?, Mar. Policy, 131, 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104621 Psaraftis, 2021, A comparative evaluation of market-based measures for shipping decarbonization, Marit. Trans. Res., 2 Reh, 2013, The informal politics of legislation: explaining secluded decision making in the European Union, Comp. Polit. Stud., 46, 1112, 10.1177/0010414011426415 Rehmatulla, 2015, Barriers to energy efficient and low carbon shipping, Ocean Eng., 110, 102, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.030 Roederer-Rynning, 2021, Black boxes and open secrets: trilogues as ‘politicised diplomacy, West Eur. Polit., 44, 485, 10.1080/01402382.2020.1716526 Roederer-Rynning, 2019, Passage to bicameralism: Lisbon's ordinary legislative procedure at ten, Comp. Eur. Polit., 17, 957, 10.1057/s41295-018-0141-2 Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis, Res. Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 Sabatier, 1993 Sabatier, 1999, The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment, 117 Sabatier, 2007, The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications, 189 Sabatier, 1986, Top-down and bottom-up models of policy implementation: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis, J. Public Policy, 6, 21, 10.1017/S0143814X00003846 Sabatier, 1988, An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein, Policy Sci., 21, 129, 10.1007/BF00136406 Sabatier, 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe, J. Eur. Public Policy, 5, 98, 10.1080/13501768880000051 Shi, 2016, Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping: Is it time to consider market-based measures?, Mar. Pol., 64, 123, 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.013 Solakivi, 2022, Cost competitiveness of alternative maritime fuels in the new regulatory framework, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 113, 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103500 Steen, 2019, Greening the fleet: a technological innovation system (TIS) analysis of hydrogen, battery electric, liquefied biogas, and biodiesel in the maritime sector, SINTEF Rep., 297 Stich, 2008, Using the advocacy coalition framework to understand freight transportation policy change, Public Works Manag. Policy, 13, 62, 10.1177/1087724X08319463 T&E, 2022, FuelEU maritime: T&E analysis and recommendations. how to drive the uptake of sustainable fuels in European shipping, Brussels: Transport & Environment Thomas, 1995, A diversity framework, 245 Thompson, 1990 2022 van Leeuwen, J. & Monios, J. (2022) Decarbonisation of the shipping sector – Time to ban fossil fuels? Marine Policy, 146, 105310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105310. von Malmborg, 2021, Exploring advocacy coalitions for energy efficiency: Policy change through internal shock and learning in the European Union, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 80, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102248 Wang, 2021, A comparative review of alternative fuels for the maritime sector: economic, technology, and policy challenges for clean energy implementation, WORLD, 2, 456, 10.3390/world2040029 Watanabe, 2022, Drop-in and hydrogen-based biofuels for maritime transport: country-based assessment of climate change impacts in Europe up to 2050, Energy Convers. Manag., 273, 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116403 Weible, 2018, Why advocacy coalitions matters and practical insights about them, Policy Politics, 46, 325, 10.1332/030557318X15230061739399 Weible, 2011, A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: an introduction to the special issue, Policy Stud. J., 39, 349, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x Weible, 2018, Understanding rationales for collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts, J. Public Policy, 38, 1, 10.1017/S0143814X16000301 Xing, 2021, Alternative fuel options for low carbon maritime transportation: pathways to 2050, J. Clean. Prod., 297, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126651