Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features
Tóm tắt
Gliomas belong to a group of central nervous system tumors, and consist of various sub-regions. Gold standard labeling of these sub-regions in radiographic imaging is essential for both clinical and computational studies, including radiomic and radiogenomic analyses. Towards this end, we release segmentation labels and radiomic features for all pre-operative multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kumar, V. et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 30, 1234–1248 (2012).
Lambin, P. et al. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. European Journal of Cancer 48, 441–446 (2012).
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E. & Hricak, H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 278, 563–577 (2015).
Hu, L. S. et al. Multi-Parametric MRI and Texture Analysis to Visualize Spatial Histologic Heterogeneity and Tumor Extent in Glioblastoma. PLOS ONE 10, e0141506 (2015).
Rutman, A. M. & Kuo, M. D. Radiogenomics: Creating a link between molecular diagnostics and diagnostic imaging. European Journal of Radiology 70, 232–241 (2009).
Proud, C. Radiogenomics: The Promise of Personalized Treatment in Radiation Oncology? Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing 18, 185 (2014).
Rosenstein, B. S. et al. Radiogenomics: Radiobiology Enters the Era of Big Data and Team Science. International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 89, 709–713 (2014).
Ellingson, B. M. Radiogenomics and imaging phenotypes in glioblastoma: novel observations and correlation with molecular characteristics. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 15, 506 (2015).
Mahajan, A., Moiyadi, A. V., Jalali, R. & Sridhar, E. Radiogenomics of glioblastoma: a window into its imaging and molecular variability. Cancer Imaging 15, P14 (2015).
Mazurowski, M. A. Radiogenomics: What It Is and Why It Is Important. Journal of the American College of Radiology 12, 862–866 (2015).
Bakas, S. et al. In vivo detection of EGFRvIII in glioblastoma via perfusion magnetic resonance imaging signature consistent with deep peritumoral infiltration: the φ-index. Clinical Cancer Research, doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1871 (2017).
Tykocinski, E. S. et al. Use of magnetic perfusion-weighted imaging to determine epidermal growth factor receptor variant III expression in glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology 14, 613–623 (2012).
Gevaert, O. et al. in Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.
Gutman, D. A. et al. MR Imaging Predictors of Molecular Profile and Survival: Multi-institutional Study of the TCGA Glioblastoma Data Set. Radiology 267, 560–569 (2013).
Mazurowski, M. A., Desjardins, A. & Malof, J. M. Imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of survival models for glioblastoma patients. Neuro-Oncology 15, 1389–1394 (2013).
Akbari, H. et al. Pattern Analysis of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Reveals Peritumoral Tissue Heterogeneity. Radiology 273, 502–510 (2014).
Gevaert, O. et al. Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features. Radiology 273, 168–174 (2014).
Gill, B. J. et al. MRI-localized biopsies reveal subtype-specific differences in molecular and cellular composition at the margins of glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 12550–12555 (2014).
Jain, R. et al. Outcome Prediction in Patients with Glioblastoma by Using Imaging, Clinical, and Genomic Biomarkers: Focus on the Nonenhancing Component of the Tumor. Radiology 272, 484–493 (2014).
Arevalo-Perez, J. et al. T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI as a Noninvasive Biomarker of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor vIII Status. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36, 2256–2261 (2015).
Bakas, S. et al. Identification of Imaging Signatures of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Variant III (EGFRvIII) in Glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology 17, 154–154 (2015).
Bonekamp, D. et al. Association of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: Comparison of intraindividually matched T1- and T2*-based bolus techniques. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 42, 87–96 (2015).
Itakura, H. et al. Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities. Sci Transl Med 7, 303ra138 (2015).
Nicolasjilwan, M. et al. Addition of MR imaging features and genetic biomarkers strengthens glioblastoma survival prediction in TCGA patients. Journal of Neuroradiology 42, 212–221 (2015).
Rios Velazquez, E. et al. Fully automatic GBM segmentation in the TCGA-GBM dataset: Prognosis and correlation with VASARI features. Scientific Reports 5, 16822 (2015).
Akbari, H. et al. Imaging Surrogates of Infiltration Obtained Via Multiparametric Imaging Pattern Analysis Predict Subsequent Location of Recurrence of Glioblastoma. Neurosurgery 78, 572–580 (2016).
Bakas, S. et al. Highly-expressed wild-type EGFR and EGFRvIII mutant glioblastomas have similar MRI signature, consistent with deep peritumoral infiltration. Neuro-Oncology 18, vi125 (2016).
Batmanghelich, N., Dalca, A., Quon, G., Sabuncu, M. & Golland, P. Probabilistic Modeling of Imaging, Genetics and Diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35, 1765–1779 (2016).
Binder, Z. A. et al. Extracellular EGFR289 activating mutations confer poorer survival and exhibit radiographic signature of enhanced motility in primary glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology 18, vi105–vi106 (2016).
Macyszyn, L. et al. Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques. Neuro-oncology 18, 417–425 (2016).
Rathore, S., Akbari, H., Rozycki, M., Bakas, S. & Davatzikos, C. Imaging pattern analysis reveals three distinct phenotypic subtypes of GBM with different survival rates. Neuro-Oncology 18, vi128 (2016).
Aerts, H. J. The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine: A Review. JAMA oncology 2, 1636–1642 (2016).
Kaus, M. R. et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI’99: Second International Conference, Cambridge, UK, September 19-22, 1999. Proceedings (eds Taylor C. & Colchester A. 1–10 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999).
Akkus, Z. et al. Semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative low grade gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Imaging 15, 12 (2015).
Bakas, S. et al. Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al.) 5–12 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Simi, V. R. & Joseph, J. Segmentation of Glioblastoma Multiforme from MR Images—A comprehensive review. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 46, 1105–1110 (2015).
Bakas, S. et al. GLISTRboost: Combining Multimodal MRI Segmentation, Registration, and Biophysical Tumor Growth Modeling with Gradient Boosting Machines for Glioma Segmentation. Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries 9556, 144–155 (2016).
Clark, K. et al. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository. Journal of Digital Imaging 26, 1045–1057 (2013).
Agn, M., Puonti, O., Law, I., Rosenschold, P. M. A. & Leemput, K. V. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 1–4 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Dvorak, P. & Menze, B. H. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 13–24 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Haeck, T., Maes, F. & Suetens, P. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 25–28 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Havaei, M., Dutil, F., Pal, C., Larochelle, H. & Jodoin, P.-M. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 29–33 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Hoogi, A., Lee, A., Bharadwaj, V. & Rubin, D. L. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 34–37 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Maier, O., Wilms, M. & Handels, H. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015), (eds Menze B. H. et al. 38–41 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Malmi, E., Parambath, S., Peyrat, J.-M., Abinahed, J. & Chawla, S. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 42–47 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Meier, R., Karamitsou, V., Habegger, S., Wiest, R. & Reyes, M. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 48–51 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Pereira, S., Pinto, A., Alves, V. & Silva, C. A. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 52–55 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Rao, V., Sarabi, M. S. & Jaiswal, A. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 56–59 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Vaidhya, K., Santhosh, R., Thirunavukkarasu, S., Alex, V. & Krishnamurthi, G. In Proceedings of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Challenge held in conjunction with MICCAI 2015 (MICCAI-BRATS 2015) (eds Menze B. H. et al. 60–64 (Technische Universität München (T.U.M.), 2015).
Agn, M., Puonti, O., Rosenschöld, P. M. A., Law, I. & Leemput, K. V. Brain Tumor Segmentation Using a Generative Model with an RBM Prior on Tumor Shape. Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries 9556, 168–180 (2016).
Havaei, M., Dutil, F., Pal, C., Larochelle, H. & Jodoin, P.-M. A Convolutional Neural Network Approach to Brain Tumor Segmentation. Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries 9556, 195–208 (2016).
Maier, O., Wilms, M. & Handels, H. Image Features for Brain Lesion Segmentation Using Random Forests. Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries 9556, 119–130 (2016).
Pereira, S., Pinto, A., Alves, V. & Silva, C. A. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Gliomas in Multi-sequence MRI. Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries 9556, 131–143 (2016).
Pereira, S., Pinto, A., Alves, V. & Silva, C. A. Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 35, 1240–1251 (2016).
Menze, B. H. et al. The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 34, 1993–2024 (2015).
Cox, R. W. et al. in Tenth Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping.
Hogea, C., Biros, G., Abraham, F. & Davatzikos, C. A robust framework for soft tissue simulations with application to modeling brain tumor mass effect in 3D MR images. Physics in medicine and biology 52, 6893–6908 (2007).
Hogea, C., Davatzikos, C. & Biros, G. Brain-tumor interaction biophysical models for medical image registration. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 30, 3050–3072 (2008).
Hogea, C. S., Biros, G. & Davatzikos, C. An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. Journal of Mathematical Biology 56, 793–825 (2008).
Rohlfing, T., Zahr, N. M., Sullivan, E. V. & Pfefferbaum, A. The SRI24 Multi-Channel Atlas of Normal Adult Human Brain Structure. Human brain mapping 31, 798–819 (2010).
Jenkinson, M. & Smith, S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical image analysis 5, 143–156 (2001).
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P. R., Brady, J. M. & Smith, S. M. Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 17, 825–841 (2002).
Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 23, 208–219 (2004).
Woolrich, M. W. et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. NeuroImage 45, S173–S186 (2009).
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. & Woolrich, M. W. FSL. NeuroImage 62, 782–790 (2012).
Jenkinson, M., Pechaud, M. & Smith, S. in Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping.
Doshi, J., Erus, G., Ou, Y., Gaonkar, B. & Davatzikos, C. Multi-Atlas Skull-Stripping. Acad Radiol 20, 1566–1576 (2013).
Doshi, J. et al. MUSE: MUlti-atlas region Segmentation utilizing Ensembles of registration algorithms and parameters, and locally optimal atlas selection. NeuroImage 127, 186–195 (2016).
Smith, S. M. & Brady, J. M. SUSAN—a new approach to low level image processing. International Journal of Computer Vision 23, 45–78 (1997).
Nyul, L. G., Udupa, J. K. & Zhang, X. New Variants of a Method of MRI Scale Standardization. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 19, 143–150 (2000).
Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P. & Evans, A. C. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 17, 87–97 (1998).
Tustison, N. J. et al. N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 29, 1310–1320 (2010).
Larsen, C. T., Iglesias, J. E. & Van Leemput, K. Bayesian and grAphical Models for Biomedical Imaging: First International Workshop, BAMBI 2014, Cambridge, MA, USA, September 18, 2014, Revised Selected Papers (eds Jorge Cardoso M. et al. 1–12 (Springer International Publishing, 2014).
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics 1189–1232 (2001).
Friedman, J. H. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 38, 367–378 (2002).
Bakas, S. et al. Fast Semi-Automatic Segmentation of Focal Liver Lesions in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Based on a Probabilistic Model. TCIV Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization 5, 329–338 (2017).
Gooya, A. et al. GLISTR: Glioma Image Segmentation and Registration. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 31, 1941–1954 (2012).
Gooya, A., Pohl, K., Billelo, M., Biros, G. & Davatzikos, C. in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) Vol. 14 532-540 (Canada, 2011).
Gooya, A., Biros, G. & Davatzikos, C. Deformable Registration of Glioma Images Using EM Algorithm and Diffusion Reaction Modeling. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 30, 375–390 (2011).
Kwon, D., Shinohara, R. T., Akbari, H. & Davatzikos, C. in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2014. 763-770 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
Pati, S. et al. in Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting (RSNA) (Chicago, IL, 2016).
Sethian, J. A. A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 1591–1595 (1996).
Deschamps, T. & Cohen, L. D. Fast extraction of minimal paths in 3D images and applications to virtual endoscopy1. Medical Image Analysis 5, 281–299 (2001).
Gaonkar, B. et al. Automated tumor volumetry using computer-aided image segmentation. Acad Radiol 22, 653–661 (2015).
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K. & Dinstein, I. H. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3, 610–621 (1973).
Haller, S. et al. Do brain T2/FLAIR white matter hyperintensities correspond to myelin loss in normal aging? A radiologic-neuropathologic correlation study. Acta Neuropathologica Communications 1, 14–14 (2013).
Vallières, M., Freeman, C., Skamene, S. & El Naqa, I. A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Physics in medicine and biology 60, 5471 (2015).
Lloyd, S. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE transactions on information theory 28, 129–137 (1982).
Li, Q. & Griffiths, J. G. in Geometric modeling and processing, proceedings 335–340 (IEEE, 2004).
Thibault, G. et al. Shape and texture indexes application to cell nuclei classification. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 27, 1357002 (2013).
Collewet, G., Strzelecki, M. & Mariette, F. Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 22, 81–91 (2004).
Galloway, M. M. Texture analysis using grey level run lengths. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 4, 172–179 (1975).
Chu, A., Sehgal, C. M. & Greenleaf, J. F. Use of gray value distribution of run lengths for texture analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 11, 415–419 (1990).
Dasarathy, B. V. & Holder, E. B. Image characterizations based on joint gray level—run length distributions. Pattern Recognition Letters 12, 497–502 (1991).
Tang, X. Texture information in run-length matrices. IEEE transactions on image processing 7, 1602–1609 (1998).
Thibault, G . Indices de forme et de texture: de la 2D vers la 3D: application au classement de noyaux de cellules. Aix Marseille 2 (2009).
Amadasun, M. & King, R. Textural features corresponding to textural properties. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and Cybernetics 19, 1264–1274 (1989).
Bilello, M. et al. Population-based MRI atlases of spatial distribution are specific to patient and tumor characteristics in glioblastoma. NeuroImage. Clinical 12, 34–40 (2016).
Assefa, D. et al. Robust texture features for response monitoring of glioblastoma multiforme on T1‐weighted and T2‐FLAIR MR images: A preliminary investigation in terms of identification and segmentation. Medical physics 37, 1722–1736 (2010).
Aerts, H. J. et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nature communications 5, 4006 (2014).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in {P}ython. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Kistler, M., Bonaretti, S., Pfahrer, M., Niklaus, R. & Büchler, P. The Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, e245 (2013).