Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy

Aakhus, M. 2003. Neither naive nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation 17(3): 265–290.

Aakhus, M. 2013. Deliberation digitized: Designing disagreement space through communication-information services. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2(1): 101–126.

Aakhus, M., and M. Lewiński. 2011. Argument analysis in large-scale deliberation. In Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. E. Feteris, B. Garssen, and A.F.S. Henkemans, 165–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Aakhus, M., and M. Lewinski. 2015. Toward polylogical analysis of argumentation: Disagreement space in the public controversy about fracking. In Proceedings of the 8th conference of the international society for the study of argumentation, ed. B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, and F. Snoeck Henkemans, 1–11. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Aakhus, M., and A. Vasilyeva. 2008. Managing disagreement space in multiparty deliberation. In Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 197–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Aakhus, M., S. Muresan, and N. Wacholder. 2013. Integrating natural language processing and argumentation theories for argumentation support. In OSSA 10: Virtues of argumentation, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewiński, 1–13. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.

Baumgartner, F., and B. Jones. 1991. Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics 53(4): 1044–1074.

Bitzer, L.F. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1(1): 1–14.

Bou-Franch, P., and P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics 73: 19–36.

Bowker, G.C., and S.L. Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Braet, A. 1987. The classical doctrine of “status” and the rhetorical theory of argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 20(2): 79–93.

Bruxelles, S., and C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni. 2004. Coalitions in polylogues. Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 75–113.

Clark, H.H., and T.B. Carlson. 1982. Hearers and speech acts. Language 58(2): 332–373.

Cramer, P.A. 2011. Controversy as news discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.

Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Wiley.

Hoppmann, M.J. 2014. A modern theory of stasis. Philosophy and Rhetoric 47(3): 273–296.

Hutchby, I. 1996. Confrontation talk: Argument, asymmetries, power. New York: Routledge.

Jackson, S. 1992. “Virtual standpoints” and the pragmatics of conversational argument. In Argumentation illuminated, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair, and C.A. Willard, 260–269. Amsterdam: SicSat.

Jackson, S. 2012. Black box arguments and accountability of experts to the public. In Between citizens and scientists: Proceedings of a conference at Iowa State University, ed. J. Goodwin, 1–18. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.

Jackson, S. 2015. Design thinking in argumentation theory and practice. Argumentation 29(3): 243–263. doi: 10.1007/s10503-015-9353-7 .

Jackson, S., and S. Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66(3): 251–265.

Jackson, S., and S. Jacobs. 1981. The collaborative production of proposals in conversational argument and persuasion: A study of disagreement regulation. Journal of the American Forensic Association 2: 77–90.

Jacobs, S. 1989. Speech acts and arguments. Argumentation 3(4): 345–365.

Jacobs, S., and M. Aakhus. 2002. What mediators do with words: Implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20(2): 177–203.

Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 2006. Derailments of argumentation: It takes two to tango. In Considering pragma-dialectics, ed. P. Houtlosser, and M.A. van Rees, 121–133. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Johnson, R.H. 2002. Interpreting Shell’s ‘Clear Thinking in Troubled Times’. Informal Logic (Teaching Supplement) 21(3): TS39–TS47.

Kennedy, G. 1963. The art of persuasion in Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1997. A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7(1): 1–20.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 1–24.

Kjeldsen, J.E. 2006. Mediated publics and rhetorical fragmentation. In Researching media, democracy, and participation, ed. N. Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, K. Nordenstreng, M. Hartmann, P. Vihalemm, and B. Cammaerts, 115–129. Tartu: Tartu University Press.

Kjeldsen, J.E. 2013. A rhetorical approach to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s speech to the EU parliament. In Speaking of Europe: Approaches to complexity in European political discourse, ed. K. Fløttum, 19–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Krauss, C., & Mouawad, J. (2014). Accidents surge as oil industry takes the train. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/business/energy-environment/accidents-surge-as-oil-industry-takes-the-train.html?_r=0 .

Leff, M. 2006. Rhetoric, dialectic, and the functions of argument. In Considering pragma-dialectics, ed. P. Houtlosser, and M.A. van Rees, 199–210. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Levinson, S.C. 1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, ed. P. Drew, and A. Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

Lewiński, M. 2010. Collective argumentative criticism in informal online discussion forums. Argumentation and Advocacy 47(2): 86–105.

Lewiński, M. 2013. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2(1): 151–177.

Lewiński, M. 2014. Practical reasoning in argumentative polylogues. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación 8: 1–20.

Lewiński, M. 2015. Argumentative discussion: The rationality of what? TOPOI: An International Review of Philosophy. doi: 10.1007/s11245-015-9361-0 .

Lewiński, M., and M. Aakhus. 2014. Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry. Argumentation 28(2): 161–185.

Lewiński, M., and D. Mohammed. 2015. Tweeting the Arab Spring: Argumentative polylogues in digital media. In Disturbing argument: Selected works from the 18th NCA/AFA alta conference on argumentation, ed. C. Palczewski, 291–297. New York: Routledge.

Marcoccia, M. 2004. On-line polylogues: Conversation structure and participation framework in internet newsgroups. Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 115–145.

Maynard, D.W. 1986. Offering and soliciting collaboration in multi-party disputes among children (and other humans). Human Studies 9: 261–285.

Perelman, Ch., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press (original work published 1958).

Pralle, S.B. 2003. Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy. Journal of Public Policy 23(3): 233–260. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X03003118 .

Schön, D.A., and M. Rein. 1994. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.

Searle, J.R. 2001. Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Searle, J.R. 2005. What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1(1): 1–22.

Star, S.L. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377–391. doi: 10.1177/00027649921955326 .

Star, S.L., and K. Ruhleder. 1996. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research 7(1): 111–134.

Tindale, C.W. 1999. Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Toulmin, S.E. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Traverso, V. 2004. Interlocutive ‘crowding’ and ‘splitting’ in polylogues: The case of a researchers’ meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 53–74.

van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson, and S. Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 1999. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies 1(4): 479–497.

van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2002. Strategic manoeuvring: Maintaining a delicate balance. In Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and P. Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Ziek, P.E. 2012. Inter-organizational infrastructure for communication: A study of the generative aspects of the communication context on CSR strategy and instrumentation. Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey. doi: 10.7282/T3FX78CB .