Những tiến bộ trong các khung mạng hợp kim titan ba chiều được chế tạo bằng phương pháp nung chảy bằng chùm electron cho các thiết bị y sinh: khía cạnh cơ học và sinh học

Kumar A, Nune KC, Murr LE, et al. Biocompatibility and mechanical behaviour of three-dimensional scaffolds for biomedical devices: process–structure–property paradigm. Int Mater Rev, 2016, 61: 20–45

Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol, 2014, 98: 159–161

Simancik F. Introduction: the strange world of cellular metals. In: Degischer HP, Kriszt B (Eds). Handbook of cellular metals. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2002, 1–4

Weber JN, White EW. Carbon-metal graded composites for permanent osseous attachment of non-porous metals. Mater Res Bull, 1972, 7: 1005–1016

Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM. The status of porous materials to obtain direct skeletal attachment by tissue ingrowth. Acta Orthop Belg 1974, 40: 755–765

White EW, Weber JN, Roy DM, et al. Replamineform porous biomaterials for hard tissue implant applications. J Biomed Mater Res, 1975, 9: 23–27

Spector M, Michno MJ, Smarook WH, et al. A high-modulus polymer for porous orthopedic implants: Biomechanical compatibility of porous implants. J Biomed Mater Res, 1978, 12: 665–677

Klawitter JJ, Bagwell JG, Weinstein AM, et al. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res, 1976, 10: 311–323

Cestero HJ, Salyer KE, Toranto IR. Bone growth into porous carbon, polyethylene, and polypropylene prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res, 1975, 9: 1–7

Homsy CA, Cain TE, Kessler FB, et al. Porous implant systems for prosthesis stabilization. Clin Orthop, 1972, 89: 220–235

Sauer BW, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, et al. The role of porous polymeric materials in prosthesis attachment. J Biomed Mater Res, 1974, 8: 145–153

Hirschhorn J, McBeath A, Dustoor M. Porous titanium surgical implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res Symp, 1971, 2: 49–67

Galante J, Rostoker W, Lueck R, et al. Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. J Bone Joint Surgery, 1971, 53: 101–114

Hahn H, Palich W. Preliminary evaluation of porous metal surfaced titanium for orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res, 1970, 4: 571–577

Karagienes M. Porous metals as a hard tissue substitute. I. Biomedical aspects. Biomater Med Dev Artif Organs, 1973: 171–181

Ryan G, Pandit A, Apatsidis DP. Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 2651–2670

Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, et al. Titanium in medicine: materials science, surface science, engineering, biological responses and medical applications. Berlin: Springer, 2001

Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2005, 26: 5474–5491

Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surgery, 1999, 81: 907–914

Hacking SA, Bobyn JD, Toh KK, et al. Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 52: 631–638

Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Binnington AG, et al. The effect of proximally and fully porous-coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling. J Orthop Res, 1987, 5: 393–408

Bronzino JD (Ed), The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, Vol. 1, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

Lemmons JE. Inorganic-organic combinations for bone repair. In: Christel P, Meumier A, Lee AJC (Eds). Biological and Biomechanical Performance of Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986, 51–57

Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, et al. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng, 2001, 7: 679–689

Niinomi M. Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2008, 1: 30–42

Heinl P, Müller L, Körner C, et al. Cellular Ti–6Al–4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomater, 2008, 4: 1536–1544

Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Medina F, et al. Additive layered manufacturing of reticulated Ti-6Al-4V biomedical mesh structures by electron beam melting. In: McGoron AJ, Li CZ, Lin WC (Eds). Proceedings of 25th Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference, ICFMBE Proceedings, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, 24: 23–28

Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Martinez E, et al. Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting. Int J Biomater, 2012, 2012: 1–14

Coelho PG, Hollister SJ, Flanagan CL, et al. Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis. Med Eng Phys, 2015, 37: 287–296

Klammert U, Gbureck U, Vorndran E, et al. 3D powder printed calcium phosphate implants for reconstruction of cranial and maxillofacial defects. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, 38: 565–570

Wang J, Yang M, Zhu Y, et al. Phage nanofibers induce vascularized osteogenesis in 3D printed bone scaffolds. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 4961–4966

Zhao S, Zhu M, Zhang J, et al. Three dimensionally printed mesoporous bioactive glass and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B, 2014, 2: 6106–6118

Jones AC, Milthorpe B, Averdunk H, et al. Analysis of 3D bone ingrowth into polymer scaffolds via micro-computed tomography imaging. Biomaterials, 2004, 25: 4947–4954

Silva GA, Coutinho OP, Ducheyne P, et al. Materials in particulate form for tissue engineering. 2. Applications in bone. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2007, 1: 97–109

Baker BM, Chen CS. Deconstructing the third dimension—how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci, 2012, 125: 3015–3024

Guvendiren M, Burdick JA. Engineering synthetic hydrogel microenvironments to instruct stem cells. Curr Opin Biotech, 2013, 24: 841–846

Kraehenbuehl TP, Langer R, Ferreira LS. Three-dimensional biomaterials for the study of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Meth, 2011, 8: 731–736

Hutmacher DW. Biomaterials offer cancer research the third dimension. Nat Mater, 2010, 9: 90–93

Guo B, Lei B, Li P, et al. Functionalized scaffolds to enhance tissue regeneration. Regenerative Biomaterials, 2015, 2: 47–57

Dawson JI, Oreffo ROC. Bridging the regeneration gap: stem cells, biomaterials and clinical translation in bone tissue engineering. Archives Biochem Biophys, 2008, 473: 124–131

Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, et al. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials—From space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012, 40: 706–718

Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater, 2009, 8: 457–470

Ebrahimkhani MR, Young CL, Lauffenburger DA, et al. Approaches to in vitro tissue regeneration with application for human disease modeling and drug development. Drug Discovery Today, 2014, 19: 754–762

Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell, 2006, 126: 677–689

Pelham RJ, Wang YL. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 13661–13665

Engelmayr GC, Cheng M, Bettinger CJ, et al. Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac anisotropy. Nat Mater, 2008, 7: 1003–1010

Roy TD, Simon JL, Ricci JL, et al. Performance of degradable composite bone repair products made via three-dimensional fabrication techniques. J Biomed Mater Res, 2003, 66A: 283–291

Chu TMG, Orton DG, Hollister SJ, et al. Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures. Biomaterials, 2002, 23: 1283–1293

Kujala S, Ryhänen J, Danilov A, et al. Effect of porosity on the osteointegration and bone ingrowth of a weight-bearing nickel–titanium bone graft substitute. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 4691–4697

Jin QM, Takita H, Kohgo T, et al. Effects of geometry of hydroxyapatite as a cell substratum in BMP-induced ectopic bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 52: 841–851

Koffler J, Kaufman-Francis K, Shandalov Y, et al. Improved vascular organization enhances functional integration of engineered skeletal muscle grafts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108: 14789–14794

Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 518–524

Hardy JG, Cornelison RC, Sukhavasi RC, et al. Electroactive tissue scaffolds with aligned pores as instructive platforms for biomimetic tissue engineering. Bioengineering, 2015, 2: 15–34

Kumar A, Nune KC, Misra R. Understanding the response of pulsed electric field on osteoblast functions in three-dimensional mesh structures. J Biomater Appl, 2016, 31: 594–605

Kumar A, Nune KC, Misra RDK. Electric field-mediated growth of osteoblasts—the significant impact of dynamic flow of medium. Biomater Sci, 2016, 4: 136–144

Pirvu T, Blanquer SBG, Benneker LM, et al. A combined biomaterial and cellular approach for annulus fibrosus rupture repair. Biomaterials, 2015, 42: 11–19

Kim DG, Huja SS, Tee BC, et al. Bone ingrowth and initial stability of titanium and porous tantalum dental implants. ImPlant Dentistry, 2013, 22: 399–405

Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 2000, 21: 2529–2543

Kiran S, Nune KC, Misra RDK. The significance of grafting collagen on polycaprolactone composite scaffolds: processingstructure-functional property relationship. J Biomed Mater Res, 2015, 103: 2919–2931

Sachlos E, Czernuszka J. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Euro Cell Mater, 2003, 5: 29–39

Liu YJ, Li SJ, Wang HL, et al. Microstructure, defects and mechanical behavior of beta-type titanium porous structures manufactured by electron beam melting and selective laser melting. Acta Mater, 2016, 113: 56–67

Murr LE, Quinones SA, Gaytan SM, et al. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti–6Al–4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2009, 2: 20–32

Hernandez J, Li SJ, Martinez E, et al. Microstructures and hardness properties for β-phase Ti–24Nb–4Zr–7.9Sn alloy fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mater Sci Tech, 2013, 29: 1011–1017

Gaytan SM, Murr LE, Martinez E, et al. Comparison of microstructures and mechanical properties for solid and mesh cobaltbase alloy prototypes fabricated by electron beam melting. Metall Mat Trans A, 2010, 41: 3216–3227

Hao YL, Li SJ, Yang R. Biomedical titanium alloys and their additive manufacturing. Rare Met, 2016, 35: 661–671

Leukers B, Gülkan H, Irsen SH, et al. Biocompatibility of ceramic scaffolds for bone replacement made by 3D printing. Mat-wiss u Werkstofftech, 2005, 36: 781–787

Oliveira JM, Rodrigues MT, Silva SS, et al. Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 6123–6137

Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Biron RJ, et al. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol, 1994, 12: 689–693

Hench L, Wilson J. An Introduction to Bioceramics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1993

Simske SJ, Ayers RA, Bateman TA. Porous materials for bone engineering. MSF, 1997, 250: 151–182

Liulan L, Aili T, Huicun Z, et al. The mechanical properties of bone tissue engineering scaffold fabricating via selective laser sintering. Life System Modeling and Simulation, 2007, 4689: 146–152

Bignon A, Chouteau J, Chevalier J, et al. Effect of micro-and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response. J Mater Sci-Mater Med, 2003, 14: 1089–1097

Chantarapanich N, Puttawibul P, Sucharitpwatskul S, et al. Scaffold library for tissue engineering: a geometric evaluation. Comp Math Methods Med, 2012, 2012: 1–14

Richart O, Descamps M, Liebetrau A, et al. Preparation and mechanical characterization of hydroxyapatite monodispersed macroporous structure. Influence of interconnection and macropores diameters. KEM, 2002, 218–220: 9–12

Zhao S, Li SJ, Hou WT, et al. The influence of cell morphology on the compressive fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2016, 59: 251–264

Liu YJ, Wang HL, Li SJ, et al. Compressive and fatigue behavior of beta-type titanium porous structures fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Mater, 2017, 126: 58–66

Liu Y, Li S, Hou W, et al. Electron beam melted beta-type Ti–24Nb–4Zr–8Sn porous structures with high strength-to-modulus ratio. J Mater Sci Tech, 2016, 32: 505–508

Weibmann V, Drescher P, Bader R, et al. Comparison of single Ti6Al4V struts made using selective laser melting and electron beam melting subject to part orientation. Metals, 2017, 7: 91

Suard M, Martin G, Lhuissier P, et al. Mechanical equivalent diameter of single struts for the stiffness prediction of lattice structures produced by Electron Beam Melting. Additive Manufacturing, 2015, 8: 124–131

Pompe W, Worch H, Epple M, et al. Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2003, 362: 40–60

Miao X, Sun D. Graded/gradient porous biomaterials. Materials, 2010, 3: 26–47

Li S, Zhao S, Hou W, et al. Functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V meshes with high strength and energy absorption. Adv Eng Mater, 2016, 18: 34–38

Hooreweder BV, Lietaert K, Neirinck B, et al. CoCr F75 scaffolds produced by additive manufacturing: Influence of chemical etching on powder removal and mechanical performance. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2017, 70: 60–67

Van Hooreweder B, Apers Y, Lietaert K, et al. Improving the fatigue performance of porous metallic biomaterials produced by selective laser melting. Acta Biomater, 2017, 47: 193–202

Liu YJ, Li SJ, Wang HL, et al. Microstructure, defects and mechanical behavior of beta-type titanium porous structures manufactured by electron beam melting and selective laser melting. Acta Mater, 2016, 113: 56–67

Pyka G, Burakowski A, Kerckhofs G, et al. Surface modification of Ti6Al4V open porous structures produced by additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater, 2012, 14: 363–370

Liu X, Chu P, Ding C. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng-R-Rep, 2004, 47: 49–121

Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials, 2007, 28: 4748–4755

Ajami E, Mahno E, Mendes VC, et al. Bone healing and the effect of implant surface topography on osteoconduction in hyperglycemia. Acta Biomater, 2014, 10: 394–405

Davies JE, Ajami E, Moineddin R, et al. The roles of different scale ranges of surface implant topography on the stability of the bone/implant interface. Biomaterials, 2013, 34: 3535–3546

Nune KC, Misra RDK, Li SJ, et al. The functional response of bioactive titania-modified three-dimensional Ti-6Al-4V mesh structure toward providing a favorable pathway for intercellular communication and osteoincorporation. J Biomed Mater Res, 2016, 104: 2488–2501

Nune KC, Misra RDK, Gai X, et al. The role of surface nanotopography on enhanced bioactivity and osteoconductive potential of anodized 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V alloy mesh structure. Coll Surf B: Biointerfaces, 2017. In press

Karaji ZG, Hedayati R, Pouran B, et al. Effects of plasma electrolytic oxidation process on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials. Mat Sci Eng C, 2017, 76: 406–416

Amin Yavari S, Ahmadi SM, van der Stok J, et al. Effects of biofunctionalizing surface treatments on the mechanical behavior of open porous titanium biomaterials. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2014, 36: 109–119

Nune KC, Misra RDK, Gaytan SM, et al. Biological response of next-generation of 3D Ti-6Al-4V biomedical devices using additive manufacturing of cellular and functional mesh structures. J Biomater Tissue Eng, 2014, 4: 755–771

Nune KC, Misra RDK, Gaytan SM, et al. Interplay between cellular activity and three-dimensional scaffold-cell constructs with different foam structure processed by electron beam melting. J Biomed Mater Res, 2015, 103: 1677–1692

Oh SH, Park IK, Kim JM, et al. In vitro and in vivo characteristics of PCL scaffolds with pore size gradient fabricated by a centrifugation method. Biomaterials, 2007, 28: 1664–1671

Klawitter JJ, Hulbert SF. Application of porous ceramics for the attachment of load bearing internal orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res, 1971, 5: 161–229

Griffon DJ, Sedighi MR, Schaeffer DV, et al. Chitosan scaffolds: interconnective pore size and cartilage engineering. Acta Biomater, 2006, 2: 313–320

Zardiackas LD, Parsell DE, Dillon LD, et al. Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam. J Biomed Mater Res, 2001, 58: 180–187

Nune KC, Kumar A, Misra RDK, et al. Osteoblast functions in functionally graded Ti-6Al-4 V mesh structures. J Biomater Appl, 2016, 30: 1182–1204

Nune KC, Kumar A, Misra RDK, et al. Functional response of osteoblasts in functionally gradient titanium alloy mesh arrays processed by 3D additive manufacturing. Colloids Surfs BBiointerfaces, 2017, 150: 78–88

Ponader S, Vairaktaris E, Heinl P, et al. Effects of topographical surface modifications of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V titanium on human fetal osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008, 84A: 1111–1119

Rapuano BE, Lee JJE, MacDonald DE. Titanium alloy surface oxide modulates the conformation of adsorbed fibronectin to enhance its binding to α5β1 integrins in osteoblasts. Eur J Oral Sci, 2012, 120: 185–194

Trivedi P, gupta P, Srivastava S, et al. Characterization and in vitro biocompatibility study of Ti–Si–N nanocomposite coatings developed by using physical vapor deposition. Appl Surf Sci, 2014, 293: 143–150

Brammer KS, Oh S, Cobb CJ, et al. Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO2 nanotube surface. Acta Biomater, 2009, 5: 3215–3223

Trivedi P, Patel AK, Maurya R, et al. Nanomechanical characterization and protein adsorption of cold-rolled zirconium alloy. JOM, 2015, 67: 726–732

Xu JY, Chen XS, Zhang CY, et al. Improved bioactivity of selective laser melting titanium: Surface modification with micro-/nano-textured hierarchical topography and bone regeneration performance evaluation. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2016, 68: 229–240

Tay CY, Irvine SA, Boey FYC, et al. Micro-/nano-engineered cellular responses for soft tissue engineering and biomedical applications. Small, 2011, 7: 1361–1378

Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials, 2011, 32: 3395–3403

Zhao L, Mei S, Chu PK, et al. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials, 2010, 31: 5072–5082

Zhao L, Liu L, Wu Z, et al. Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials, 2012, 33: 2629–2641

Kubo K, Tsukimura N, Iwasa F, et al. Cellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 5319–5329

Zhuang XM, Zhou B, Ouyang JL, et al. Enhanced MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast response and bone formation on the addition of nano-needle and nano-porous features to microtopographical titanium surfaces. Biomed Mater, 2014, 9: 045001

Wang W, Zhao L, Wu K, et al. The role of integrin-linked kinase/β-catenin pathway in the enhanced MG63 differentiation by micro/nano-textured topography. Biomaterials, 2013, 34: 631–640

Brammer KS, Frandsen CJ, Jin S. TiO2 nanotubes for bone regeneration. Trends Biotech, 2012, 30: 315–322

Liu XH, Wu L, Ai HJ, et al. Cytocompatibility and early osseointegration of nanoTiO2-modified Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn surfaces. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2015, 48: 256–262

Ma XY, Feng YF, Ma ZS, et al. The promotion of osteointegration under diabetic conditions using chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite coating on porous titanium surfaces. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 7259–7270

Wang L, Hu X, Ma X, et al. Promotion of osteointegration under diabetic conditions by tantalum coating-based surface modification on 3-dimensional printed porous titanium implants. Colloids Surfs B-Biointerfaces, 2016, 148: 440–452

Javed F, Romanos GE. Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic literature review. J Periodontology, 2009, 80: 1719–1730

Tamam E, Turkyilmaz I. Effects of pH and elevated glucose levels on the electrochemical behavior of dental implants. J Oral Im-Plantology, 2014, 40: 153–159

Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Gonçalves Y, et al. Long-term outcome of implant rehabilitations in patients with systemic disorders and smoking habits: a retrospective clinical study. Clinical ImPlant Dentistry Related Res, 2016, 18: 649–665

Feng YF, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of reactive oxygen species overproduction on osteogenesis of porous titanium implant in the present of diabetes mellitus. Biomaterials, 2013, 34: 2234–2243

Trivedi P, Nune KC, Misra RDK. Grain structure dependent selfassembled bioactive coating on Mg-2Zn-2Gd alloy: Mechanism of degradation at biointerfaces. Surf Coatings Tech, 2017, 315: 250–257

Morscher EW, Hefti A, Aebi U. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating. J Bone Joint Surgery, 1998, 80: 267–272

Røkkum M, Reigstad A, Johansson CB. HA particles can be released from well-fixed HA-coated stems. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 2002, 73: 298–306

Nune KC, Kumar A, Murr LE, et al. Interplay between self-assembled structure of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and osteoblast functions in three-dimensional titanium alloy scaffolds: Stimulation of osteogenic activity. J Biomed Mater Res, 2016, 104: 517–532

Kumar A, Nune KC, Misra RDK. Biological functionality and mechanistic contribution of extracellular matrix-ornamented three dimensional Ti-6Al-4V mesh scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res, 2016, 104: 2751–2763

Liu H, Li W, Liu C, et al. Incorporating simvastatin/poloxamer 407 hydrogel into 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4 V scaffolds for the promotion of angiogenesis, osseointegration and bone ingrowth. Biofabrication, 2016, 8: 045012

Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Medina F, et al. Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays. Philos Trans R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 2010, 368: 1999–2032

Torres J, Tamimi F, Alkhraisat MH, et al. Vertical bone augmentation with 3D-synthetic monetite blocks in the rabbit calvaria. J Clin Periodontol, 2011, 38: 1147–1153

Wu BM, Borland SW, Giordano RA, et al. Solid free-form fabrication of drug delivery devices. J Control Release, 1996, 40: 77–87

Katstra WE, Palazzolo RD, Rowe CW, et al. Oral dosage forms fabricated by Three Dimensional Printing™. J Control Release, 2000, 66: 1–9

Wu W, Zheng Q, Guo X, et al. The controlled-releasing drug implant based on the three dimensional printing technology: Fabrication and properties of drug releasing in vivo. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mat Sci Edit, 2009, 24: 977–981

Yu DG, Zhu LM, Branford-White CJ, et al. Three-dimensional printing in pharmaceutics: promises and problems. J Pharmaceutical Sci, 2008, 97: 3666–3690

Kuboki Y, Jin Q, Takita H. Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg, 2001, 83: S105–S115

Tsuruga E, Takita H, Itoh H, et al. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. J Biochem, 1997, 121: 317–324

Yarlagadda P, Chandrasekharan M, Shyan J. Recent advances and current developments in tissue scaffolding. Biomed Mater Eng, 2005, 15: 159–177

Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis.. Nat Med, 2000, 6: 389–395

Laschke MW, Harder Y, Amon M, et al. Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng, 2006, 12: 2093–2104

Rouwkema J, Rivron NC, van Blitterswijk CA. Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends Biotech, 2008, 26: 434–441

Malda J, Rouwkema J, Martens DE, et al. Oxygen gradients in tissue-engineered Pegt/Pbt cartilaginous constructs: Measurement and modeling. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2004, 86: 9–18

Folkman J. Self-regulation of growth in three dimensions. J Exp Med, 1973, 138: 745–753

Colton CK. Implantable biohybrid artificial organs. Cell Trans-Plantation, 1995, 4: 415–436

Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases.. Nature, 2000, 407: 249–257

Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Sales K, et al. The roles of tissue engineering and vascularisation in the development of microvascular networks: a review. Biomaterials, 2005, 26: 1857–1875

Druecke D, Langer S, Lamme E, et al. Neovascularization of poly (ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds in vivo: long-term investigations using intravital fluorescent microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res, 2004, 68A: 10–18

Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid freeform fabrication systems. Trends Biotech, 2004, 22: 354–362

Novosel EC, Kleinhans C, Kluger PJ. Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 2011, 63: 300–311

Liu WF, Chen CS. Engineering biomaterials to control cell function. Mater Today, 2005, 8: 28–35

Hutmacher DW. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues—state of the art and future perspectives. J BioMater Sci Polymer Ed, 2001, 12: 107–124

Anderson CR, Ponce AM, Price RJ. Immunohistochemical identification of an extracellular matrix scaffold that microguides capillary sprouting in vivo. J Histochem Cytochem, 2004, 52: 1063–1072

Ochman S, Frey S, Raschke MJ, et al. Local application of VEGF compensates callus deficiency after acute soft tissue trauma-results using a limb-shortening distraction procedure in rabbit tibia. J Orthop Res, 2011, 29: 1093–1098

Trueta J, Little K. The vascular contribution to osteogenesis II. Studies with the electron microscope. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1960, 42-B: 367–376

Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotech, 2012, 30: 546–554

Holder Jr. WD, Gruber HE, Roland WD, et al. Increased vascularization and heterogeneity of vascular structures occurring in polyglycolide matrices containing aortic endothelial cells implanted in the rat. Tissue Eng, 1997, 3: 149–160

Mooney DJ, Mikos AG. Growing new organs. Sci Am, 1999, 280: 60–65

Muller D, Chim H, Bader A, et al. Vascular guidance: microstructural scaffold patterning for inductive neovascularization. Stem Cells Int, 2011, 2011: 1–6

Prasad K, Bazaka O, Chua M, et al. Metallic biomaterials: current challenges and opportunities. Materials, 2017, 10: 884–917

Li S, Li X, Hou W, et al. Fabrication of open-cellular (porous) titanium alloy implants: osseointegration, vascularization and preliminary human trials. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 525–536

Fan H, Fu J, Li X, et al. Implantation of customized 3-D printed titanium prosthesis in limb salvage surgery: a case series and review of the literature. World J Surg Onc, 2015, 13: 308–317

Ponader S, von Wilmowsky C, Widenmayer M, et al. In vivo performance of selective electron beam-melted Ti-6Al-4V structures. J Biomed Mater Res, 2010, 92A: 56–62

Hollander DA, von Walter M, Wirtz T, et al. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti–6Al–4V produced by direct laser forming. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 955–963

Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, et al. The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteumderived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater, 2012, 8: 2824–2834

Butscher A, Bohner M, Hofmann S, et al. Structural and material approaches to bone tissue engineering in powder-based threedimensional printing. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7: 907–920

Sobral JM, Caridade SG, Sousa RA, et al. Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7: 1009–1018

Olivares-Navarrete R, Gittens RA, Schneider JM, et al. Osteoblasts exhibit a more differentiated phenotype and increased bone morphogenetic protein production on titanium alloy substrates than on poly-ether-ether-ketone. Spine J, 2012, 12: 265–272

Levchenko I, Ostrikov KK, Zheng J, et al. Scalable graphene production: perspectives and challenges of plasma applications. Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 10511–10527

Lethaus B, Kessler P, Boeckman R, et al. Reconstruction of a maxillary defect with a fibula graft and titanium mesh using CAD/CAM techniques. Head Face Med, 2010, 6: 16–19

Malhotra K, Sharma A, Giraddi G, et al. Versatility of titanium 3D plate in comparison with conventional titanium miniplate fixation for the management of mandibular fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2012, 11: 284–290

Lee UL, Kwon JS, Woo SH, et al. Simultaneous bimaxillary surgery and mandibular reconstruction with a 3-dimensional printed titanium implant fabricated by electron beam melting: A preliminary mechanical testing of the printed mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74: 1501