Adult limb and breast amputees’ experience and descriptions of phantom phenomena—A qualitative study

Scandinavian Journal of Pain - Tập 1 - Trang 43-49 - 2010
Berit Björkman1, Staffan Arnér1, Iréne Lund2, Lars-Christer Hydén3
1Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
3Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Health and Society, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Phantom phenomena – pain or other sensations appearing to come from amputated body parts – are frequent consequences of amputation and can cause considerable suffering. Also, stump pain, located in the residual limb, is in the literature often related to the phantom phenomena. The condition is not specific to amputated limbs and has, to a lesser extent, been reported to be present after radical surgery in other body parts such as breast, rectum and teeth. Multi-causal theories are used when trying to understand these phenomena, which are recognized as the result of complex interaction among various parts of the central nervous system confirmed in studies using functional brain imaging techniques. Functional brain imaging has yielded important results, but without certainty being related to phantom pain as a subjective clinical experience. There is a wide range of treatment methods for the condition but no documented treatment of choice. Aims In this study a qualitative, explorative and prospective design was selected, in the aim to understand the patients’ personal experience of phantom phenomena. The research questions focused at how patients affected by phantom pain and or phantom sensations describe, understand, and live with these phenomena in their daily life. This study expanded ‘phantom phenomena’ to also encompass phantom breast phenomenon. Since the latter phenomenon is not as well investigated as the phantom limb, there is clinical concern that this is an underestimated problem for women who have had breasts removed. Methods The present study forms the first part of a larger, longitudinal study. Only results associated with data from the first interviews with patients, one month after an amputation, are presented here. At this occasion, 28 patients who had undergone limb amputation (20) or mastectomy (8) were interviewed. The focused, semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed using discourse-narrative analysis. Results The interviewees had no conceptual problems in talking about the phenomena or distinguishing between various types of discomfort and discomfort episodes. Their experience originated from a vivid, functioning body that had lost one of its parts. Further, the interviewees reported the importance of rehabilitation and advances in prosthetic technology. Loss of mobility struck older amputees as loss of social functioning, which distressed them more than it did younger amputees. Phantom sensations, kinetic and kinesthetic perceptions, constituted a greater problem than phantom pain experienced from the amputated body parts. The descriptions by patients who had had mastectomies differed from those by patients who had lost limbs in that the phantom breast could be difficult to describe and position spatially. The clinical implication of this study is that when phantom phenomena are described as everyday experience, they become a psychosocial reality that supplements the definition of phantom phenomena in scientific literature and clinical documentation. Conclusions There is a need for clinical dialogues with patients, which besides, providing necessary information about the phenomena to the patients creates possibilities for health professionals to carefully listen to the patients’ own descriptions of which functional losses or life changes patients fear the most. There is a need for more qualitative studies in order to capture the extreme complexity of the pain–control system will be highlighted.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Björkman B, Arnér S, Hydén LC. Phantom breast and other syndromes after mastectomy: eight breast cancer patients describe their experiences over time: a 2-year follow-up study. J Pain 2008;11:1018–25. Calvino B, Grilo RM. Central pain control. Joint Bone Spine 2006;73:10–6.1592264510.1016/j.jbspin.2004.11.006 Carr DB, Loeser JD, Morris DB. Why narrative? In: Carr DB, Loeser JD, Morris DB, editors. Narrative, pain and suffering, progress in pain research and management, vol. 34. Seattle: IASP Press; 2005. p. 1–13. Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Affective distress and amputation-related pain among older men with long-term traumatic amputations. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006;31:362–8.10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.08.01416632084 Dijkstra PU, Rietman JS, Geertzen JH. Phantom breast sensations and phantom breast pain: a 2-year prospective study and a methodological analysis of literature. Eur J Pain 2007;11:99–108.10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.01.002 Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a change for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129–38.10.1126/science.847460 Fraser CM, Halligan PW, Robertson IH, Kirker SG. Characterising phantom limb phenomena in upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001;25:235–42.1186009810.1080/03093640108726607 Halbert J, Crotty M, Cameron ID. Evidence for the optimal management of acute and chronic phantom pain: a systematic review. Clin J Pain 2002;18:84–93.1188277110.1097/00002508-200203000-00003 Halligan PW. Phantom limbs: the body in mind. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2002;7:251–69.10.1080/13546800244000111 Hanley MA, Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Hoffman AJ, Patterson DR, Robinson LR. Psychosocial predictors of long term adjustment to lower limb amputation and phantom limb pain. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:882–93.10.1080/0963828041000170889615497917 Hill A. Phantom limb pain: a review of the literature on attributes and potential mechanisms. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999;17:125–42.10.1016/S0885-3924(98)00136-510069153 Hill A, Niven CA, Knussen C. Pain memories in phantom limbs: a case study. Pain 1996;66:381–4.10.1016/0304-3959(96)03046-18880862 Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2007;26:837–50. Hunter JP, Katz J, Davis KD. The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness. Brain 2003;126:579–89.1256627910.1093/brain/awg054 Hydén L-C. Illness and narrative. Soc Health Ill 1997;19:48–69. Hydén L-C. Pain and communicative creativity. In: Carr DB, Loeser JD, Morris DB, editors. Narrative, pain and suffering, progress in pain research and management, vol. 34. Seattle: IASP Press; 2005. p. 263–7. Hydén LC, Brockmeier J, editors. Health, culture and illness: broken narratives. New York: Routhledge; 2008. Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Non-painful phantom limb phenomena in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and temporal course. Acta Neurol Scand 1984;70:407–14.6516789 Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Immediate and long-term phantom limb pain in amputees: pre-amputation limb pain. Pain 1985;21:267–78.10.1016/0304-3959(85)90090-93991231 Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Hoffman AJ, Patterson DR, Czerniecki JM, Robinson LR. Cognitions, coping and social environment predict adjustment to phantom limb pain. Pain 2002;95:133–42.1179047610.1016/S0304-3959(01)00390-6 Katz J, Melzack R. Pain memories in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. Pain 1990;43:319–36.10.1016/0304-3959(90)90029-D2293143 Kleinman A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing & the human condition. New York: Basic Books; 1988. Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Elzinga A, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain 2000;87:33–41.1086304310.1016/S0304-3959(00)00264-5 Kugelmann R. The psychology and management of pain: gate control as theory and symbol. Theory Psychol 1997;7:43–65.10.1177/0959354397071005 Kugelmann R. Complaining about chronic pain. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:1663–76.1057423710.1016/S0277-9536(99)00240-3 Lund I, Pain, its assessment and treatment using sensory stimulation techniques, Thesis for doctorial degree, Stockholm: Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet; 2006. p. 1–6. Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet 2001a;358:397–400.10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05548-9 Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001b;358:483–8.10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6 Manchikanti L, Singh V. Managing phantom pain. Pain Phys 2004;7:365–75. Melzack R. Phantom limbs. Sci Am 1992;266:90–6. Mishler EG. Research interviewing context and narrative. 6th edn. USA: Harvard University Press; 1995. Nikolajsen L, Jensen TS. Phantom limb pain. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:107–16.1146079910.1093/bja/87.1.107 Peolsson M, Hydén L-C, Sätterlund Larsson U. Living with chronic pain: a dynamic learning process. Scand J Occup Ther 2000a;7:114–25.10.1080/110381200300006069 Peolsson M, Säljö R, Sätterlund Larsson U. Experiencing and knowing pain—patients’ perspective. Adv Physiother 2000b;2:146–55.10.1080/140381900750063409 Rachmandrandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D.O. Hebb lecture (review). Brain 1998;121:1603–30. Richardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, Horgan M. Incidence of phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 month after major lower amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin J Pain 2006;22:353–8.10.1097/01.ajp.0000177793.01415.bd16691088 Riessman CK. Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993. Riessman CK. Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage Publications; 2008. Schiffrin D. Approaches to discourse. Cambridge: Blackwell Publisher Inc; 1994. pp. viii–ix, pp. 1–43. Schott GD. Communicating the experience of pain: the role of analogy. Pain 2004;108:209–12.1503093910.1016/j.pain.2004.01.037 Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analyzing talk text and interaction. 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications; 2006. pp. 1–61, pp. 223–225. Thomsen DK, Pedersen AF, Johansen MB, Jensen AB, Zachariae R. Breast cancer patients’ narratives about positive and negative communication experiences. Acta Oncol 2007;46:900–8.1791782210.1080/02841860701261550 Weinstein SM. Phantom limb pain and related disorders. Neurol Clin 1998;16:919–35.976707010.1016/S0733-8619(05)70105-5 Whyte AS, Niven CA. Psychological distress in amputee with phantom limb pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001a;22:938–46.10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00352-9 Whyte AS, Niven CA. Variation in phantom limb pain: results of a diary study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001b;22:947–53.10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00356-6 Wilkins KL, McGrath PJ, Finley A, Katz J. Prospective diary study of non-painful and painful phantom sensations in a pre-selected sample of child and adolescent amputees reporting phantom limbs. Clin J Pain 2004;20:293–301.10.1097/00002508-200409000-00003
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Tập 1

43-49

Thông tin tác giả