Adjudicating Disputes Along China’s New Silk Road: Towards Unity, Diversity or Fragmentation of International Law?
Tóm tắt
This article analyses dispute resolution in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) from the perspective of the debate on unity, diversity and fragmentation of international law. This article presents a critical perspective that although the BRI preaches unity through greater economic (and social) integration, it currently increases fragmentation by failing to offer a unified dispute resolution mechanism. The analysis considers how some of the major procedural issues perceived in the BRI—at the time of transnational dispute management—are being addressed. Approaching this from the perspective of diversity in international law provides a novel method to consider BRI adjudication, and (potentially) a concrete target (of unity) to aim towards for strengthening the BRI as a genuine transnational law-making process. However, the consequences of increased fragmentation in BRI dispute resolution are many, including multiplications of disputes in different forums (with different procedures, case law and legal remedies) which, in the long term, will bring deep fragmentation among BRI countries and become an impediment to the BRI’s success. Finally, this article asks whether unity in BRI dispute resolution is a realistic target, considering the Chinese State’s (perceived) preference for maintaining flexibility in relation to the initiative, and highlights the long-term consequences for international lawyers of the fragmentation in BRI dispute resolution.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahuja N (2018) The CISG in HK—to apply or not to apply? Hong Kong Lawyer, July 2018. http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/cisg-hong-kong-apply-or-not-apply. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Alburo F (1990) The ASEAN summit and ASEAN economic cooperation. In: Naya S, Takayama A (eds) Economic development in East and Southeast Asia: essays in honor of Professor Shinichi Ichimura. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore, pp 299–306
Andenas M, Bjorge E (2015) Introduction: from fragmentation to convergence in international law. In: Andenas M, Bjorge E (eds) A farewell to fragmentation: reassertion and convergence in international Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Basedow R (2018) The WTO and the rise of plurilateralism—what lessons can we learn from the European Union’s experience with differentiated integration? J Int Econ Law 21:411–431
Bell G (2005) Harmonisation of contract law in Asia—harmonising regionally or adopting global harmonisations—the example of the CISG. Sing J Legal Stud 362–372
Belt & Road Office, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (2021) Vision and actions on jointly building the Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-century Maritime Silk Road (issued jointly by the National Development and Reform Committee of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China and Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China and authorised by the State Council of the People’s Republic of China in March 2015). https://www.beltandroad.gov.hk/visionandactions.html. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Benvenisti E, Downs G (2007) The empire’s new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanf Law Rev 60:595–631
Berman P (2016) The inevitable legal pluralism within universal harmonization regimes: the case of the CISG. Unif Law Rev 21:23–40
Boele-Woelki K (2010) Unifying and harmonizing substantive law and the role of conflict of laws. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague
Boltenko O (2017) Resolving disputes along the Belt and Road: are the battle lines drawn? Asian Disput Rev 19:190–196
Bookman P, Erie M (2021) Experimenting with international commercial dispute resolution. Am J Int Law Unbound 115:5–10
Brand RA, Herrup P (2008) The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: commentary and documents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Broude T (2013) Keep calm and carry on: Martti Koskenniemi and the fragmentation of international law. Temple Int Comp Law J 27:279–292
Cai W, Kolieb J (2020) Between national interests and global business: China’s possible reservations to the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. J Int Disput Settl 11:295–318
Caminos H (2013) The growth of specialized international tribunals and the fears of fragmentation of international law. In: Boschiero N et al (eds) International courts and the development of international law: essays in honour of Tullio Treves. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 55–64
Casas-i-Klett T, Serrano-Oswald O (2018) Free trade agreements as BRI’s stepping-stone to multilateralism: is the Sino-Swiss FTA the gold standard? In: Zhang W, Alon I, Lattemann C (eds) China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 75–93
Chaisse J (2018) China–European Union investment relationships towards a new leadership in global investment governance? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Chaisse J (2019) China’s international investment strategy: bilateral, regional, and global law and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chaisse J, Matsushita M (2018) China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: mapping the world’s normative and strategic implications. J World Trade 52:163–185
Chaisse J, Kirkwood J (2020) Chinese puzzle: anatomy of the (invisible) Belt and Road investment treaty. J Int Econ Law 23:245–269
Chaisse J, Olaoye K (2020) The tired dragon: casting doubts on China’s investment treaty practice. Berkeley Bus Law J 17:134–167
Chaisse J, Kirkwood J (2021) One stone, two birds: can China leverage WTO accession to build the BRI? J World Trade 55:287–307
Chaisse J, Qian X (2021) Conservative innovation: the ambiguities of the China International Commercial Court. Am J Int Law Unbound 115:17–21
Chen W, Goldstein G (2017) The Asian principles of private international law: objectives, contents, structure and selected topics on choice of law. J Priv Int Law 13:411–434
Chen Y et al (2018) Understanding the multiple functions of construction contracts: the anatomy of FIDIC model contracts. Constr Manag Econ 36:472–485
Chhina R (2015) The uniform customs and practice for documentary credit: are they merely a set of contractual terms? Bank Financ Law Rev 30:245–265
China International Commercial Court, People’s Republic of China (2019a) The China International Commercial Court hears its first case. http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/208/210/1237.html. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
China International Commercial Court, People’s Republic of China (2019b) The first International Commercial Court of the Supreme People’s Court holds its first public hearing. http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/208/210/1251.html. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
China Justice Observer (2018a) Time to loosen the criteria for recognizing and enforcing foreign judgments in China. China Justice Obserser, 8 March 2018. https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/time-to-loosen-the-criteria-for-recognizing-and-enforcing-foreign-judgments-in-china. Accessed 27 Jan 2021
China Justice Observer (2018b) Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements in China. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326395398_Recognition_and_Enforcement_of_Foreign_Judgments_in_China_Vol_1_No_1-CJO. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
China Justice Observer (2019a) China and HCCH Judgments Convention in 2019. https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/china-and-hcch-judgments-convention-in-2019. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
China Justice Observer (2019b) List of China’s cases on recognition of foreign judgments. China Justice Observer, 16 July 2019. https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/list-of-chinas-cases-on-recognition-of-foreign-judgments. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
China Justice Observer (2019c) Case tracking series. https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/cicc-case-tracking-series-01. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Cho S, Kurtz J (2018) Convergence and divergence in international economic law and politics. Eur J Int Law 29:169–203
Chong A (2020a) Out now: list of China’s cases on recognition of foreign judgments. Conflict of Laws.Net: Views and news in private international law (23 April 2020). https://conflictoflaws.net/2020/out-now-list-of-chinas-cases-on-recognition-of-foreign-judgments/. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Chong S (2020b) Dispute settlement in the Belt and Road Initiative: lessons from the Singapore Experience. Chin J Comp Law 8:30–39
Cogan J (2011) The idea of fragmentation. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law 105, pp 123–125
D’Andrea & Partners Legal Counsel (2019) BRI: dispute resolution and jurisdictional issues. Eurobiz online, 3 January 2019. https://www.eurobiz.com.cn/bri-dispute-resolution-and-jurisdictional-issues/. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Dahlan M (2018) Dimensions of the New Belt and Road international order: an analysis of the emerging legal norms and a conceptionalisation of the regulation of disputes. Beijing Law Rev 9:87–112
Dahlan M (2019) Dispute regulation in the institutional development of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: establishing the normative legal implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. In: Quayle P, Gao X (eds) International organizations and the promotion of effective dispute resolution: AIIB Yearbook of International Law 2019. Brill | Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 121–144
Deng F, Wang Y, Li Z, Liang X (2020) China’s technology spillover effects in the countries along the Belt and Road—evidence from 49 BRI countries. Appl Econ 52:5579–5594
Dezan Shira and Associates (2018) Vassal states? Understanding China’s Belt and Road MoU. Silk Road Briefing, 8 February 2018. https://www.silkroadbriefing.com/news/2018/02/08/vassal-states-understanding-chinas-belt-road-mou/. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Egger P (2021) Putting the China-EU comprehensive agreement on investment in context. China Econ J 14:187–199
Erie M (2020) The new legal hubs: the emergent landscape of international commercial dispute resolution. Va J Int Law 59:25–30
Erie M, Prusinowska M (2021) The future of foreign arbitration in the People’s Republic of China: current developments and challenges ahead. Asia Pac Law Rev 29:1–20
Fangda Partners (2019) Enforcement of judgments and arbitral awards in China: overview. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/8-619-0132?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Fischer-Lescano A et al (2004) Regime-collisions: the vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Mich J Int Law 25:999–1046
Franck T (1995) Fairness in international law and institutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Graziadei M, Smith L (2017) Comparative property law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Greenwood C (2015) Unity and diversity in international law. In: Andenas M, Bjorge E (eds) A farewell to fragmentation: reassertion and convergence in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 37–55
Guo Y (2020) From conventions to protocols: conceptualizing changes to the international dispute resolution landscape. J Int Disput Settl 11:217–241
Hafner G (2004) Pros and cons ensuing from fragmentation of international law. Mich J Int Law 25:849–863
Han S (2013) Principles of Asian contract law: an endeavor of regional harmonization of contract law in East Asia. Villanova Law Rev 58:589–600
Hoekman B, Mavroidis P (2020) To AB or not to AB? Dispute settlement in WTO reform. J Int Econ Law 23:1–20
Holmes P (2011) The rhetoric of ‘legal fragmentation’ and its discontents. Evolutionary dilemmas in the constitutional semantics of global law. Utrecht Law Rev 7:113–140
Horigan D (2015) From Abu Dhabi to Singapore: the rise of international commercial courts. Int J Humanit Manag Sci 3:78–85
Huang J (2019) Reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China: promising developments, prospective challenges and proposed solutions. Nord J Int Law 88:250–279
Huaxia L, Lentner G (2018) Paving the Silk Road BIT by BIT: an analysis of investment protection for Chinese infrastructure/projects under the Belt and Road Initiative. In: Chaisse J, Górski J (eds) The Belt and Road Initiative, law, economics and politics. Brill | Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 250–283
Huo Z, Yip M (2019) Comparing the international commercial courts of China with the Singapore International Commercial Court. Int Comp Law Q 68:903–942
Idrees R, Cheema Z, Riaz J (2020) Role of harmonization and unification in perspective of China–Pakistan economic corridor physical infrastructure and applicable laws. J Adv Res Law Econ 11:45–54
Jackson J (2008) The case of the World Trade Organization. Int Aff 84:437–454
Jie C, Bing X (2018) On the reform and suggestions to apply the reciprocity principle to enforce foreign judgments under the ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative. Jiangsu Soc Sci 2:254–266
Kang S (2017) One Belt, One Road initiative into a new regional trade agreement: implication to the WTO dispute settlement system. Transnatl Disput Manag 3:1–12
Kavass I (2007) WTO accession: procedure, requirements and costs. J World Trade 41:453–474
Koskenniemi M (2006) Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, 13 April 2006. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Koskenniemi M, Leino P (2002) Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties. Leiden J Int Law 15:553–579
Leathley C (2007) An institutional hierarchy to combat the fragmentation of international law: has the ILC missed an opportunity? New York Univ J Int Law Politics 40:259–306
Lee Y (2016) A study on draft articles, principles of Asian contract law, performance and non-performance. Research Institute for Asia Private Law, Seoul
Legrand P (1996) European legal systems are not converging. Int Comp Law Q 45:52–81
Lehmann M (2017) Legal fragmentation, extraterritoriality and uncertainty in global financial regulation. Oxf J Leg Stud 37:406–434
Lewis D, Moise D (2017) One Belt One Road (‘OBOR’) roadmaps: the legal and policy frameworks. Transnatl Disput Manag 3:1–32
Li Y, Bian C (2020) China’s stance on investor-state dispute settlement: evolution, challenges, and reform options. Neth Int Law Rev 67:503–551
Lindroos A (2005) Addressing norm conflicts in a fragmented legal system: the doctrine of lex specialis. Nord J Int Law 74:27–66
Lingliang Z (2016) Conceptual analysis of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: a road towards a regional community of common destiny. Chin J Int Law 15:517–541
Martineau A (2009) The rhetoric of fragmentation: fear and faith in international law. Leiden J Int Law 22:1–28
Maxeiner J (2008) Some realism about legal certainty in the globalization of the rule of law. Houst J Int Law 31:27–46
McInerney-Lankford S (2012) Fragmentation of international law redux: the case of Strasbourg. Oxf J Leg Stud 32:609–632
Megiddo T (2019) Beyond fragmentation: on international law’s integrationist forces. Yale J Int Law 44:115–148
Menon S (2014) The somewhat uncommon law of commerce. Singap Acad Law J 26:23–49
Menon S (2019) The settlement of international commercial disputes: alternative dispute resolution, commercial courts, and the converge of commercial laws. Speech at the National Judges College, Beijing 29 August 2019. https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/docs/default-source/module-document/speech/cj-39-s-speech-for-national-judges-college-beijing.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Michaels R, Pauwelyn J (2012) Conflict of norms or conflict of laws? Different techniques in the fragmentation of public international law. Duke J Comp Int Law 22:349–376
Monateri P (2017) Comparative contract law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Mulder J (2018) Unity and diversity in the European Union’s internal market case law: towards unity in ‘good governance’? Utrecht J Int Eur Law 34:4–23
Norton P (2018) China’s Belt and Road Initiative: challenges for arbitration in Asia. Univ Pa Asian Law Rev 13:72–101
Office of the Leading Group for Promoting the Belt and Road Initiative (2019) The Belt and Road Initiative progress, contributions and prospects, official (5-year) report. https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/zchj/qwfb/86739.htm. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Ott G (2001) China’s accession into the WTO: the practice of international bribery and the issues it presents for American counsel whose clients are doing business within the confines of the Great Wall. Temp Int Comp Law J 15:147–170
Pauwelyn J (2004) Bridging fragmentation and unity: international law as a universe of inter-connected islands. Mich J Int Law 25:903–916
Peng S (2000) The WTO legalistic approach and East Asia: from the legal culture perspective. Asia-Pac Law Pol J 1:78–118
Perillo J (1994) Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts: the black letter text and a review. Fordham Law Rev 63:281–344
Petersmann E (2020) International settlement of trade and investment disputes over Chinese ‘Silk Road projects’ inside the European Union. European University Institute Working Papers, February 2020. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/66869/LAW_2020_02.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Ping CK (2017) Judicial cooperation a first for Singapore, China. The Straits Times, 22 August 2017. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/judicial-cooperation-a-first-for-singapore-china. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Platsas A (2009) The idea of legal convergence and international economic law. Int J Priv Law 2:385–399
Popa L (2018) Does proliferation of international judicial bodies lead to the fragmentation of international law? In: Popa LE (ed) Patterns of treaty interpretation as anti-fragmentation tools. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 15–78
Portland (2018) Commercial courts report. https://portland-communications.com/pdf/Portland-commercial-courts-report-2018.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Prost M, Clark P (2006) Unity, diversity and the fragmentation of international law: how much does the multiplication of international organizations really matter? Chin J Int Law 5:341–370
Puig S (2014) International regime complexity and economic law enforcement. J Int Econ Law 17:491–516
Qian X (2021) The legal legitimacy of the China International Commercial Court history geopolitics and law. Asia Pac Law Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2020.1856310
Rao P (2004) Multiple international judicial forums: a reflection of the growing strength of international law or its fragmentation? Mich J Int Law 25:929–962
Requejo M (2019) International commercial courts in the litigation market. MPILux Research Paper 2019 (2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3327166. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Roberts A (2021) Introduction to the Symposium on global labs of international commercial dispute resolution. Am J Int Law Unbound 115:1–4
Russel DR, Berger B (2019) Navigating the Belt and Road Initiative. A report of the Asia Society Policy Institute. https://asiasociety.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/Navigating%20the%20Belt%20and%20Road%20Initiative_0.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Sauvé P (2019) To fuse, not to fuse, or simply confuse? Assessing the case for normative convergence between goods and services trade law. J Int Econ Law 22:355–371
Severino R, Thuzar M (2018) ASEAN Economic cooperation and its political realities. Moving the AEC beyond 2015. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore, Singapore, pp 24–43
Song J (2018) Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China: challenges and developments. 30 August 2018. http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/199/203/1048.html. Accessed 27 Jan 2021
Srivastava A (2020) International unification of trade laws. In: Srivastava A (ed) Modern law of international trade. Comparative export trade and international harmonization. Springer, Singapore, pp 23–49
Stewart D (2019) The Hague Conference adopts a new convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil or commercial matters. Am J Int Law 113:772–783
Tsang K (2017) Chinese bilateral judgement enforcement treaties. Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law Rev 40:1–49
Tsang K (2018) Enforcement of foreign commercial Judgements in China. J Priv Int Law 14:262–294
Vidigal G (2019) Living without the appellate body: multilateral, bilateral and plurilateral solutions to the WTO dispute settlement crisis. J World Invest Trade 6:862–890
Vines D (2018) The BRI and RCEP: ensuring cooperation in the liberalisation of trade in Asia. Econ Political Stud 6:338–348
Wang G (2017a) The Belt and Road Initiative in quest for a dispute resolution mechanism. Asia Pac Law Rev 25:1–16
Wang H (2017b) The RCEP and its investment rules: learning from past Chinese FTAs. Chin J Glob Gov 3:160–181
Wang H (2019a) China’s approach to the Belt and Road Initiative: scope, character and sustainability. J Int Econ Law 22:29–55
Wang H (2019b) The future of deep free trade agreements: the convergence of TPP (and CPTPP) and CETA? J World Trade 53:317
Wang Z, Chen J (2019) Will the establishment of circuit tribunals break up the circular reforms in the Chinese judiciary? Asian J Comp Law 14:91–112
Wang L, Zhao J (2019) China’s Belt and Road Initiative and building the community of common destiny. World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd., Singapore
Wang L, Li Y (2020) The negotiation of EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment and its potential impact in the post-pandemic era. J Chin Econ Bus Stud 18:365–372
Waters J (2017) ‘Unimpeded trade’ in Central Asia—a trade facilitation challenge. Transnatl Disput Manag 3:1–21
Weatherill S (2017) The internal market as a legal concept. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Werner W, de Hoon M, Galán A (2017) The law of international lawyers: reading Martti Koskenniemi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Xiaoyu F (2021) Agree or agree to disagree: China–EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) negotiation and the ISDS reform. Chin J Comp Law 8:635–638
Xu A (2018) China cases insight no. 3: Belt & Road typical case 13: towards a liberal interpretation of the reciprocity principle for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (29 June 2018). https://cgc.law.stanford.edu/commentaries/clc-1-201806-insights-3-alison-xu/. Accessed 27 Jun 2021
Yin W (2018) Challenges, issues in China–EU investment agreement and the implication on China’s domestic reform. Asia Pac Law Rev 26(2):170–202
Yu Y (2021) China’s implementation of its ‘one belt one road’ initiative: legal challenges and regulation by law. Asian J WTO Int Health Law Policy 16:121–152
Zhang S (2020) China’s International Commercial Court: background, obstacles and the road ahead. J Int Disput Settl 11:150–174
Zhiwei L (2017) Belt and Road a turning point for arbitration in China? 7th Greater China Arbitration Forum, Beijing, October 2017. https://www.vantageasia.com/belt-road-turning-point-arbitration-china/. Accessed 27 Jun 2021