Tuân thủ các can thiệp kỹ thuật số trong lĩnh vực y tế: Các định nghĩa, phương pháp và những câu hỏi còn bỏ ngỏ

Sven Kernebeck1, Theresa Sophie Busse1, Jan Peter Ehlers1, Horst Christian Vollmar2
1Lehrstuhl für Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland
2Medizinische Fakultät, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland

Tóm tắt

Nhiều can thiệp kỹ thuật số phụ thuộc vào sự tham gia của người dùng để có thể tạo ra tác động tích cực. Trong nhiều lĩnh vực, có thể quan sát thấy rằng việc sử dụng các can thiệp kỹ thuật số bởi người dùng thường giảm đáng kể hoặc bị ngừng lại hoàn toàn sau một thời gian ngắn. Điều này được coi là một trong những yếu tố chính hạn chế hiệu quả của các can thiệp kỹ thuật số. Trong bối cảnh này, khái niệm tuân thủ (tuân theo các chỉ dẫn điều trị) trong các can thiệp kỹ thuật số đang trở nên ngày càng quan trọng. Tuân thủ trong các can thiệp kỹ thuật số được định nghĩa là "mức độ mà người dùng thực hiện chương trình như nó đã được thiết kế". Điều này cũng thường được mô tả bằng các thuật ngữ "sử dụng theo ý định" hoặc "sử dụng như đã được thiết kế". Tuy nhiên, cả việc xem xét lý thuyết và thực tiễn về tuân thủ trong các can thiệp kỹ thuật số vẫn chưa được nghiên cứu đầy đủ. Mục tiêu của bài viết tổng quan này là chỉ ra rõ hơn về khái niệm tuân thủ trong các can thiệp kỹ thuật số và phân biệt nó với các khái niệm liên quan. Ngoài ra, bài viết sẽ thảo luận về các phương pháp và chỉ số để hoạt động hóa tuân thủ và các yếu tố dự đoán có thể ảnh hưởng tích cực đến tuân thủ. Bài viết cũng sẽ đề cập đến mối quan hệ liều lượng - tác động khi áp dụng các can thiệp kỹ thuật số và những yếu tố có thể ảnh hưởng tích cực đến tuân thủ. Cuối cùng, bài viết sẽ kết thúc bằng một cái nhìn đạo đức về vấn đề này.

Từ khóa

#tuân thủ #can thiệp kỹ thuật số #y tế #hiệu quả #phương pháp nghiên cứu

Tài liệu tham khảo

Murray E, Hekler EB, Andersson G et al (2016) Evaluating digital health interventions key questions and approaches. Am J Prev Med 51:843–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008 Sieverink F, Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE (2017) Clarifying the concept of adherence to ehealth technology: systematic review on when usage becomes adherence. J Med Internet Res 19:e402. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8578 Vilardaga R, Casellas-Pujol E, McClernon JF, Garrison KA (2019) Mobile applications for the treatment of tobacco use and dependence. Curr Addict Rep 6:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00248-0 Milne-Ives M, Lam C, Cock CD et al (2020) Mobile apps for health behavior change in physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, and mental health: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8:e17046. https://doi.org/10.2196/17046 Zhou C, Hu H, Wang C et al (2020) The effectiveness of mHealth interventions on postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x20917816 Byambasuren O, Sanders S, Beller E, Glasziou P (2018) Prescribable mHealth apps identified from an overview of systematic reviews. NPJ Digit Med 1:12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0021-9 Ahmadiankalati M, Steins-Loeber S, Paslakis G (2020) Review of randomized controlled trials using e‑health interventions for patients with eating disorders. Front Psychiatry 11:568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00568 Wang Y, Min J, Khuri J et al (2020) Effectiveness of mobile health interventions on diabetes and obesity treatment and management: systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8:e15400. https://doi.org/10.2196/15400 Hennessy M, Heary C, Laws R et al (2019) The effectiveness of health professional-delivered interventions during the first 1000 days to prevent overweight/obesity in children: a systematic review. Obes Rev 20:1691–1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12924 Li R, Liang N, Bu F, Hesketh T (2020) The effectiveness of self-management of hypertension in adults using mobile health: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8:e17776. https://doi.org/10.2196/17776 Linardon J, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P et al (2019) The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 18:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20673 Enam A, Torres-Bonilla J, Eriksson H (2018) Evidence-based evaluation of eHealth interventions: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 20:e10971. https://doi.org/10.2196/10971 Huckvale K, Nicholas J, Torous J, Larsen ME (2020) Smartphone apps for the treatment of mental health conditions: status and considerations. Curr Opin Psychol 36:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.008 Mattila E, Lappalainen R, Välkkynen P et al (2016) Usage and dose response of a mobile acceptance and commitment therapy app: secondary analysis of the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 4:e90. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5241 Tibble H, Flook M, Sheikh A et al (2020) Measuring and reporting treatment adherence: what can we learn by comparing two respiratory conditions? Br J Clin Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14458 Ryan C, Bergin M, Wells JS (2018) Theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions: a scoping review. Int J Behav Med 25:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9678-8 Donkin L, Christensen H, Naismith SL et al (2011) A systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e‑therapies. J Med Internet Res 13:e52. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772 Eysenbach G (2005) The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 7:e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 Arsenijevic J, Tummers L, Bosma N (2020) Adherence to electronic health tools among vulnerable groups: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 22:e11613. https://doi.org/10.2196/11613 Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L (2009) Adherence in Internet interventions for anxiety and depression: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 11:e13. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1194 Miller S, Ainsworth B, Yardley L et al (2019) A framework for analyzing and measuring usage and engagement data (AMusED) in digital interventions: viewpoint. J Med Internet Res 21:e10966. https://doi.org/10.2196/10966 Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S (2017) Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med 7:254–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1 O’Brien HL, Toms EG (2008) What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59:938–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801 Barello S, Triberti S, Graffigna G et al (2016) eHealth for patient engagement: a systematic review. Front Psychol 6:2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013 Hightow-Weidman LB, Bauermeister JA (2019) Engagement in mHealth behavioral interventions for HIV prevention and care: making sense of the metrics. Mhealth 6:7–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2019.10.01 Beatty L, Binnion C (2016) A systematic review of predictors of, and reasons for, adherence to online psychological interventions. Int J Behav Med 23:776–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9 Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Gemert-Pijnen JEV (2012) Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res 14:e152. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2104 Venkatesh V, Thong J, Xu X (2016) Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. J Assoc Inf Syst 17:328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428 Nunes A, Limpo T, Castro SL (2019) Acceptance of mobile health applications: examining key determinants and moderators. Front Psychol 10:2791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02791 Zhang R, Nicholas J, Knapp AA et al (2019) Clinically meaningful use of mental health apps and its effects on depression: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res 21:e15644. https://doi.org/10.2196/15644 Bradway M, Gabarron E, Johansen M et al (2020) Methods and measures used to evaluate patient-operated mobile health interventions: scoping literature review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8:e16814. https://doi.org/10.2196/16814 Short CE, DeSmet A, Woods C et al (2018) Measuring engagement in eHealth and mhealth behavior change interventions: viewpoint of methodologies. J Med Internet Res 20:e292. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9397 Smith N, Liu S (2020) A systematic review of the dose-response relationship between usage and outcomes of online weight-loss interventions. Internet Interv 22:100344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100344 Pham Q, Graham G, Carrion C et al (2019) A library of analytic indicators to evaluate effective engagement with consumer mhealth apps for chronic conditions: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7:e11941. https://doi.org/10.2196/11941 Achilles MR, Anderson M, Li SH et al (2020) Adherence to e‑mental health among youth: considerations for intervention development and research design. Digital Health 6:205520762092606. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620926064 Linardon J, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M (2019) Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: a systematic and meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 88:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000459 Widmer RJ, Senecal C, Allison TG et al (2020) Dose-response effect of a digital health intervention during cardiac rehabilitation: subanalysis of randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 22:e13055. https://doi.org/10.2196/13055 Kavandi H, Jaana M (2020) Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: a systematic review. Health Soc Care Community. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13011 Lie SS, Karlsen B, Oord ER et al (2017) Dropout from an eHealth intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 19:e187. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7479 Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C et al (2014) Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? meta-analysis. Health Psychol 33:465–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032853 Baumel A, Yom-Tov E (2018) Predicting user adherence to behavioral eHealth interventions in the real world: examining which aspects of intervention design matter most. Transl Behav Med 8:793–798. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx037 Looyestyn J, Kernot J, Boshoff K et al (2017) Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review. PLoS ONE 12:e173403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173403 Edney S, Ryan JC, Olds T et al (2019) User engagement and attrition in an app-based physical activity intervention: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 21:e14645. https://doi.org/10.2196/14645 Clarke AM, Kuosmanen T, Barry MM (2015) A systematic review of online youth mental health promotion and prevention interventions. J Youth Adolescence 44:90–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0165-0 Groß D, Schmidt M (2018) E‑Health und Gesundheitsapps aus medizinethischer Sicht. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 61:349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-018-2697-z Ernstmann N, Bauer U, Berens E‑M et al (2020) DNVF Memorandum Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 1) – Hintergrund, Relevanz, Gegenstand und Fragestellungen in der Versorgungsforschung. Gesundheitswesen 82:e77–e93. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1191-3689