Adenomyosis at a Glance: An Integrated Review of Transvaginal Ultrasound and MR Imaging Findings
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bergeron, 2006, Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 511, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.016
Antero, 2020, Pathology and pathogenesis of adenomyosis, Semin Reprod Med, 38, 108, 10.1055/s-0040-1718922
Van den Bosch, 2019, Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 53, 576, 10.1002/uog.19096
Brosens, 2015, Uterine cystic adenomyosis: a disease of younger women, J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 28, 420, 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.05.008
Takeuchi, 2010, Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases, Fertil Steril, 94, 862, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.010
Zhai, 2020, Adenomyosis: mechanisms and pathogenesis, Semin Reprod Med, 38, 1
Kitawaki, 2006, Adenomyosis: the pathophysiology of an oestrogen-dependent disease, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 493, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.010
Parazzini, 1997, Risk factors for adenomyosis, Hum Reprod, 12, 1275, 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1275
Vercellini, 2006, Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 465, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017
Azziz, 1989, Adenomyosis: current perspectives, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 16, 221, 10.1016/S0889-8545(21)00148-0
Bergholt, 2001, Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy, Hum Reprod, 16, 2418, 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2418
Cohen, 1997, High frequency of adenomyosis in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 44, 200, 10.1159/000291520
Struble, 2016, Adenomyosis: a clinical review of a challenging gynecologic condition, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 23, 164, 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.018
Harada, 2016, The impact of adenomyosis on women's fertility, Obstet Gynecol Surv, 71, 557, 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000346
Pontis, 2016, Adenomyosis: a systematic review of medical treatment, Gynecol Endocrinol, 32, 696, 10.1080/09513590.2016.1197200
Garcia, 2011, Adenomyosis: review of the literature, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 18, 428, 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.04.004
Tellum, 2020, Noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis: a structured review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in imaging, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 27, 408, 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.001
Exacoustos, 2011, Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 37, 471, 10.1002/uog.8900
Champaneria, 2010, Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 89, 1374, 10.3109/00016349.2010.512061
Reinhold, 1996, Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation, Radiology, 199, 151, 10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633139
Bazot, 2017, European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis, Eur Radiol, 27, 2765, 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z
Kubik-Huch, 2018, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of leiomyomas, Eur Radiol, 28, 3125, 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5
Van Den Bosch, 2015, Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 46, 284, 10.1002/uog.14806
Kishi, 2012, Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 207, 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027
Grimbizis, 2014, Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis, Fertil Steril, 101, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.025
Bazot, 2018, Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis, Fertil Steril, 109, 389, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024
Gordts, 2008, Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification, Reprod Biomed Online, 17, 244, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60201-5
Novellas, 2011, MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis, Am J Roentgenol, 196, 1206, 10.2214/AJR.10.4877
Tellum T. The diagnosis and clinical implications of adenomyosis. In: “East meets West” Obstetrics and Gynaecology Ultrasound Webinar Series. 2021.
Munro, 2020, Classification and reporting systems for adenomyosis, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 27, 296, 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.013
Atri, 2000, Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in vitro study, Radiology, 215, 783, 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn06783
Chapron, 2020, Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach, Hum Reprod Update, 26, 392, 10.1093/humupd/dmz049
Takeuchi, 2011, Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques, RadioGraphics, 31, 99, 10.1148/rg.311105110
O'Shea, 2020, Imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis, Semin Reprod Med, 38, 119, 10.1055/s-0040-1719017
Van den Bosch, 2018, Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 51, 16, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013
Cunningham, 2018, Adenomyosis: a sonographic diagnosis, RadioGraphics, 38, 1576, 10.1148/rg.2018180080
Tamai, 2005, MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls, RadioGraphics, 25, 21, 10.1148/rg.251045060
Benson, 1958, Adenomyosis: a reappraisal of symptomatology, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 76, 1044, 10.1016/0002-9378(58)90186-8
Naftalin, 2012, Inter- and intraobserver variability in three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the endometrial-myometrial junction and factors affecting its visualization, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 39, 587, 10.1002/uog.10133
Nougaret, 2021, Benign uterine disease: the added role of imaging, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 48, 193, 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.12.002
Dueholm, 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, Fertil Steril, 76, 588, 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01962-8
Bazot, 2001, Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology, Hum Reprod, 16, 2427, 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2427
Takeuchi, 2010, Manifestations of the female reproductive organs on MR images: changes induced by various physiologic states, RadioGraphics, 30, e39, 10.1148/rg.e39
Masui, 2003, Pseudolesions related to uterine contraction: characterization with multiphase-multisection T2-weighted MR imaging, Radiology, 227, 345, 10.1148/radiol.2271011587
Ferenczy, 1998, Pathophysiology of adenomyosis, Hum Reprod Update, 4, 312, 10.1093/humupd/4.4.312
Habiba, 2018, Adenomyosis and endometrial cancer: literature review, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 83, 313, 10.1159/000487320
Khalifa, 2019, Adenomyosis as a confounder to accurate endometrial cancer staging, Semin Ultrasound CT MRI, 40, 358, 10.1053/j.sult.2019.04.004
Nougaret, 2019, Endometrial cancer MRI staging: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology, Eur Radiol, 29, 792, 10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y
Yajima, 2021, Diffusion-weighted imaging of uterine adenomyosis: correlation with clinical backgrounds and comparison with malignant uterine tumors, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 47, 949, 10.1111/jog.14621