Adenomyosis at a Glance: An Integrated Review of Transvaginal Ultrasound and MR Imaging Findings

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology - Tập 52 - Trang 412-417 - 2023
Catarina Janicas1, Teresa Margarida Cunha2
1Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
2Department of Radiology, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bergeron, 2006, Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 511, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.016 Antero, 2020, Pathology and pathogenesis of adenomyosis, Semin Reprod Med, 38, 108, 10.1055/s-0040-1718922 Van den Bosch, 2019, Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 53, 576, 10.1002/uog.19096 Brosens, 2015, Uterine cystic adenomyosis: a disease of younger women, J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 28, 420, 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.05.008 Takeuchi, 2010, Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases, Fertil Steril, 94, 862, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.010 Zhai, 2020, Adenomyosis: mechanisms and pathogenesis, Semin Reprod Med, 38, 1 Kitawaki, 2006, Adenomyosis: the pathophysiology of an oestrogen-dependent disease, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 493, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.010 Parazzini, 1997, Risk factors for adenomyosis, Hum Reprod, 12, 1275, 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1275 Vercellini, 2006, Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 465, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017 Azziz, 1989, Adenomyosis: current perspectives, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 16, 221, 10.1016/S0889-8545(21)00148-0 Bergholt, 2001, Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy, Hum Reprod, 16, 2418, 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2418 Cohen, 1997, High frequency of adenomyosis in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 44, 200, 10.1159/000291520 Struble, 2016, Adenomyosis: a clinical review of a challenging gynecologic condition, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 23, 164, 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.018 Harada, 2016, The impact of adenomyosis on women's fertility, Obstet Gynecol Surv, 71, 557, 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000346 Pontis, 2016, Adenomyosis: a systematic review of medical treatment, Gynecol Endocrinol, 32, 696, 10.1080/09513590.2016.1197200 Garcia, 2011, Adenomyosis: review of the literature, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 18, 428, 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.04.004 Tellum, 2020, Noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis: a structured review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in imaging, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 27, 408, 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.001 Exacoustos, 2011, Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 37, 471, 10.1002/uog.8900 Champaneria, 2010, Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 89, 1374, 10.3109/00016349.2010.512061 Reinhold, 1996, Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation, Radiology, 199, 151, 10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633139 Bazot, 2017, European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis, Eur Radiol, 27, 2765, 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z Kubik-Huch, 2018, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of leiomyomas, Eur Radiol, 28, 3125, 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5 Van Den Bosch, 2015, Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 46, 284, 10.1002/uog.14806 Kishi, 2012, Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 207, 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027 Grimbizis, 2014, Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis, Fertil Steril, 101, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.025 Bazot, 2018, Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis, Fertil Steril, 109, 389, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024 Gordts, 2008, Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification, Reprod Biomed Online, 17, 244, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60201-5 Novellas, 2011, MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis, Am J Roentgenol, 196, 1206, 10.2214/AJR.10.4877 Tellum T. The diagnosis and clinical implications of adenomyosis. In: “East meets West” Obstetrics and Gynaecology Ultrasound Webinar Series. 2021. Munro, 2020, Classification and reporting systems for adenomyosis, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 27, 296, 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.013 Atri, 2000, Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in vitro study, Radiology, 215, 783, 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn06783 Chapron, 2020, Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach, Hum Reprod Update, 26, 392, 10.1093/humupd/dmz049 Takeuchi, 2011, Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques, RadioGraphics, 31, 99, 10.1148/rg.311105110 O'Shea, 2020, Imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis, Semin Reprod Med, 38, 119, 10.1055/s-0040-1719017 Van den Bosch, 2018, Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 51, 16, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013 Cunningham, 2018, Adenomyosis: a sonographic diagnosis, RadioGraphics, 38, 1576, 10.1148/rg.2018180080 Tamai, 2005, MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls, RadioGraphics, 25, 21, 10.1148/rg.251045060 Benson, 1958, Adenomyosis: a reappraisal of symptomatology, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 76, 1044, 10.1016/0002-9378(58)90186-8 Naftalin, 2012, Inter- and intraobserver variability in three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the endometrial-myometrial junction and factors affecting its visualization, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 39, 587, 10.1002/uog.10133 Nougaret, 2021, Benign uterine disease: the added role of imaging, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 48, 193, 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.12.002 Dueholm, 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, Fertil Steril, 76, 588, 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01962-8 Bazot, 2001, Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology, Hum Reprod, 16, 2427, 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2427 Takeuchi, 2010, Manifestations of the female reproductive organs on MR images: changes induced by various physiologic states, RadioGraphics, 30, e39, 10.1148/rg.e39 Masui, 2003, Pseudolesions related to uterine contraction: characterization with multiphase-multisection T2-weighted MR imaging, Radiology, 227, 345, 10.1148/radiol.2271011587 Ferenczy, 1998, Pathophysiology of adenomyosis, Hum Reprod Update, 4, 312, 10.1093/humupd/4.4.312 Habiba, 2018, Adenomyosis and endometrial cancer: literature review, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 83, 313, 10.1159/000487320 Khalifa, 2019, Adenomyosis as a confounder to accurate endometrial cancer staging, Semin Ultrasound CT MRI, 40, 358, 10.1053/j.sult.2019.04.004 Nougaret, 2019, Endometrial cancer MRI staging: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology, Eur Radiol, 29, 792, 10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y Yajima, 2021, Diffusion-weighted imaging of uterine adenomyosis: correlation with clinical backgrounds and comparison with malignant uterine tumors, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 47, 949, 10.1111/jog.14621