Brannstrom M, Johannesson L, Bokstrom H, Kvarnstrom N, Molne J, Dahm-Kahler P, Enskog A, Milenkovic M, Ekberg J, Diaz-Garcia C, Gabel M, Hanafy A, Hagberg H, Olausson M, Nilsson L (2015) Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet (London, England) 385:607–616
Brannstrom M, Johannesson L, Dahm-Kahler P, Enskog A, Molne J, Kvarnstrom N, Diaz-Garcia C, Hanafy A, Lundmark C, Marcickiewicz J, Gabel M, Groth K, Akouri R, Eklind S, Holgersson J, Tzakis A, Olausson M (2014) First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six-month report. Fertil Steril 101:1228–1236
Jones BP, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J, Diaz-Garcia C, Friend P, Ghaem-Maghami S, Testa G, Johannesson L, Quiroga I, Yazbek J, Smith JR (2019) Human uterine transplantation: a review of outcomes from the first 45 cases. BJOG 126:1310–1319
Goetgheluck J, Carbonnel M, Ayoubi JM (2014) Robotically assisted gynecologic surgery: 2-year experience in the French foch hospital. Front Surg 1:8
Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, Staf C, Radestad AF, Reynisson P, Stalberg K, Falconer H, Persson J, Dahm-Kahler P (2019) No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer 116:169–177
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, Isla D, Tamura M, Zhu T, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Nicklin JL, Coleman RL, Obermair A (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379:1895–1904
Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J, Seagle BL, Alexander A, Barber EL, Rice LW, Wright JD, Kocherginsky M, Shahabi S, Rauh-Hain JA (2018) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379:1905–1914
Martino MA, Bixel K, Johnson AM, Wejkszner T, Jacobs A, Lazaro J, Makarova E, Thomas MB, Fowler J (2020) A novel technique to minimize contamination for cervical cancer surgery patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.006
Favre-Inhofer A, Rafii A, Carbonnel M, Revaux A, Ayoubi JM (2018) Uterine transplantation: review in human research. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 47:213–221
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196
Kvarnstrom N, Jarvholm S, Johannesson L, Dahm-Kahler P, Olausson M, Brannstrom M (2017) Live donors of the initial observational study of uterus transplantation-psychological and medical follow-up until 1 year after surgery in the 9 cases. Transplantation 101:664–670
Testa G, Koon EC, Johannesson L, McKenna GJ, Anthony T, Klintmalm GB, Gunby RT, Warren AM, Putman JM, dePrisco G, Mitchell JM, Wallis K, Olausson M (2017) Living donor uterus transplantation: a single center’s observations and lessons learned from early setbacks to technical success. Am J Transplant 17:2901–2910
Kisu I, Kato Y, Obara H, Matsubara K, Matoba Y, Banno K, Aoki D (2018) Emerging problems in uterus transplantation. BJOG 125:1352–1356
Ayoubi JM, Carbonnel M, Pirtea P, Kvarnstrom N, Brannstrom M, Dahm-Kahler P (2019) Laparotomy or minimal invasive surgery in uterus transplantation: a comparison. Fertil Steril 112:11–18
Fornalik H, Fornalik N (2018) Uterus transplantation:robotic surgeon perspective. Fertil Steril 109:365
Giacomoni A, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A, Concone G, Buscemi V, Rossetti O, De Carlis L (2016) Robotic nephrectomy for living donation: surgical technique and literature systematic review. Am J Surg 211:1135–1142
Wei L, Xue T, Tao KS, Zhang G, Zhao GY, Yu SQ, Cheng L, Yang ZX, Zheng MJ, Li F, Wang Q, Han Y, Shi YQ, Dong HL, Lu ZH, Wang Y, Yang H, Ma XD, Liu SJ, Liu HX, Xiong LZ, Chen BL (2017) Modified human uterus transplantation using ovarian veins for venous drainage: the first report of surgically successful robotic-assisted uterus procurement and follow-up for 12 months. Fertil Steril 108:346–356
Arnolds K, Gomez N, Berry A, Stadtlander K, Watson M, Tzakis A, Falcone T, Zimberg S (2016) Assessment of an alternative to the uterine vein for venous drainage in human uterine transplantation: a case series following laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 81:436–441
Brannstrom M, Dahm-Kahler P, Kvarnstrom N (2018) Robotic-assisted surgery in live-donor uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril 109:256–257
Puntambekar S, Telang M, Kulkarni P, Jadhav S, Sathe R, Warty N, Puntambekar S, Kade S, Panse M, Agarkhedkar N, Gandhi G, Manchekar M, Parekh H, Parikh K, Desai R, Mehta M, Chitale M, Nanda S (2018) Laparoscopic-assisted uterus retrieval from live organ donors for uterine transplant. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:571–572
Puntambekar S, Telang M, Kulkarni P, Puntambekar S, Jadhav S, Panse M, Sathe R, Agarkhedkar N, Warty N, Kade S, Manchekar M, Parekh H, Parikh K, Desai R, Mehta M, Chitale M, Kinholkar B, Jana JS, Pare A, Sadre A, Karnik S, Mane A, Gandhi G, Kanade S, Phadke U (2018) Laparoscopic-assisted uterus retrieval from live organ donors for uterine transplant: our experience of two patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:622–631
Testa G, McKenna GJ, Gunby RT Jr, Anthony T, Koon EC, Warren AM, Putman JM, Zhang L, dePrisco G, Mitchell JM, Wallis K, Klintmalm GB, Olausson M, Johannesson L (2018) First live birth after uterus transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 18:1270–1274