Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’

Hub Zwart1, Laurens Landeweerd1, Arjan van Rooij1
1Department of Philosophy and Science Studies, Faculty of Science, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society (ISIS), Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, 6500 GL, the Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Blume SS: The development of Dutch science policy in international perspective, 1965–1985. The Hague: RAWB; 1986.

Broerse J, de Cock Buning T: Public engagement in science, technology and innovation: the interactive learning and action approach. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics I. 2nd edition. Edited by: Chadwick R. Elsevier, Oxford; 2011:674–684.

Chadwick R, Zwart H: Editorial: from ELSA to responsible research and promisomics. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2013, 9: 3. 10.1186/2195-7819-9-3

Collingridge D: The social control of technology. St. Martin's Press; London: Pinter, New York; 1980.

Cook-Deegan R: The gene wars. Science, politics and the human genome. Norton, New York/London; 1994/1995.

Eckenwiler, Lisa A., and Felicia Cohn (eds.). 2007. The ethics of bioethics, mapping the moral landscape. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD; 2007.

Freud S: Die Traumdeutung. Gesammelte Werke II/III. Imago, London; 1900/1942.

Illich I: Limits to medicine. Medical nemesis: the expropriation of health. Pelican Books, Harmondsworth; 1977.

Kay L: Who wrote the book of life? A history of the genetic code. Stanford University Press, Stanford; 2000.

Krabbenborg L: Involvement of civil society actors in nanotechnology: creating productive spaces for interaction. Groningen, RUG; 2013.

Lacan J: L’instance de la lettre dans l’inconscient ou la raison depuis Freud. In Écrits. Éditions du Seuil, Paris; 1966:493–530.

Moor J, Weckert J, Baird D, Nordmann H, Schummer J: Nanoethics: assesing the nanoscale from an ethical point of view. In Discovering the nanoscale. IOS Press, Amsterdam; 2003.

NWO. 2012. Maatschappelijk verantwoord innoveren. Derde subsidieronde 2012. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Den Haag; 2012.

Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J: Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 2012, 39(6):751–760. 10.1093/scipol/scs093

Penders B, Nelis AP: Credibility engineering in the food industry. Science in Context 2011, 24(4):487–515. 10.1017/S0269889711000202

Robinson D: Constructive technology assessment of emerging nanotechnologies. Experiments in interactions. 2010.

Rodrígueza H, Fishera E, Schuurbiers D: Integrating science and society in European framework programmes: trends in project-level solicitations. Research Policy 2013, 42(5):1126–1137. 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.006

Serres M: Hermes 2: L’interférence. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris; 1972.

Stegmaier P: The rock ‘n’ roll of knowledge co-production. Science and Society Series on convergence research. EMBO Reports 2009, 10(6):114–119.

Tallacchini M: Governing by values. EU ethics: soft tool, hard effects. Minerva 2009, 47: 281–306. 10.1007/s11024-009-9127-1

Toulmin S: How medicine saved the life of ethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1982, 25: 736–750.

van den Hoven J, Jacob K, Nielsen L, Roure F, Rudze L, Stilgoe J, Blind K, Guske A-L, Riera CM: Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. report of the expert group on the state of art in Europe on responsible research and innovation. European Commission/Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels; 2013.

von Schomberg, R. 2011. Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, ed. M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft, 39–61. Dordrecht: Springer.

von Schomberg, R. 2012. See ethics as a stimulus, not as an obstacle. Interview. LEV 8, November 2012, 14–18.

von Schomberg, R. 2013. In Responsible innovation, ed. R. Owen, M. Heintz, and J. Bessant. London: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch3.

Wheale, P, R von Schomberg, and P Glasner (eds.). 1998. The social management of genetic engineering. Ashgate, Aldershot; 1998.

Wickson F, Strand R, Kjølberg KL: The walkshop approach to science and technology ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics (on-line) 2014.

Yesley M: What’s ELSI got to do with it? Bioethics and the human genome project. New Genetics and Society 2008, 27(1):1–6. 10.1080/14636770701843527

Zwart H: Consensus formation as a basic strategy in ethics. In Bioethics in a European Perspective. Edited by: Have H, Gordijn B. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht/Boston/London: ; 2001:281–288.

Zwart H, et al.: Ethical expertise in policy. In Encyclopaedia of applied ethics. 2nd edition. Edited by: Chadwick R. Elsevier, Oxford; 2012:157–164. 10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00006-5

Zwart H: Harvesting results - preparing for the future. Centre for society and the life sciences (CSG) 2008–2013. ᅟ, Nijmegen: 2013; 2013.

Zwart H, Nelis A: What is ELSA genomics? Science and society series on convergence research. EMBO Reports 2009, 10(6):1–5. 10.1038/embor.2009.115