Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets
Tóm tắt
As was shown by Wykowska, Schubö, and Hommel (Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–1769, 2009), action control can affect rather early perceptual processes in visual search: Although size pop-outs are detected faster when having prepared for a manual grasping action, luminance pop-outs benefit from preparing for a pointing action. In the present study, we demonstrate that this effect of action–target congruency does not rely on, or vary with, set-level similarity or element-level similarity between perception and action—two factors that play crucial roles in standard stimulus–response interactions and in models accounting for these interactions. This result suggests that action control biases perceptual processes in specific ways that go beyond standard stimulus–response compatibility effects and supports the idea that action–target congruency taps into a fundamental characteristic of human action control.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson, S. J., & Yamagishi, N. (2000). Spatial localization of colour and luminance stimuli in human peripheral vision. Vision Research, 40, 759–771.
Band, G. P. H., van Steenbergen, H., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Falkenstein, M., & Hommel, B. (2009). Action-effect negativity: Irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback. Biological Psychology, 82, 211–218.
Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370–374.
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547.
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus & Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. A. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673–1692.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–1837.
Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.
Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, 71, 22–29.
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S–R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.
Graves, R. E. (1996). Luminance and colour effects on localization of briefly flashed visual stimuli. Visual Neuroscience, 13, 567–573.
Greenwald, A. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99.
Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.
Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.
Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526.
Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 121–140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.
Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2001). Detection by action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 84–89.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Dover.
Jordan, J. S., & Hershberger, W. A. (1994). Timing the shift in retinal local signs that accompanies a saccadic eye movement. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 657–666.
Jordan, J. S., & Hunsinger, M. (2008). Learned patterns of action–effect extrapolation contribute to the spatial displacement of continuously moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 113–124.
Jordan, J. S., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Spatial perception and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 54–59.
Kerzel, D., Jordan, J. S., & Muesseler, J. (2001). The role of perceptual anticipation in the localization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27, 829–840.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis of stimulus–response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
Kornblum, S., Stevens, G., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli I: The time course of S–S and S–R consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli (DO Type 4 task), Simon-like tasks (DO Type 3 task), and their factorial combinations (DO Type 7 task). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688–714.
Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medizinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2005). Attention, instruction, and response representation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 674–685.
Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Tailoring perception and action to the task at hand. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 579–592.
Morin, R. E., & Grant, D. A. (1955). Learning and performance on a keypressing task as a function of the degree of spatial stimulus–response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 39–47.
Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1021–1035.
Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.
Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.
Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G.,& Koch, I. (2009). Cognition and action.In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh,& P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 35-71). Oxford, England: University Press.
Rosenbloom, P. S., & Newell, A. (1987). An integrated computational model of stimulus–response compatibility and practice. Psychology of Learning andMotivation, 21, 3–49.
Schubö, A., Prinz, W., & Aschersleben, G. (2004). Perceiving while acting: Action affects perception. Psychological Research, 68, 208–215.
Spironelli, C., Tagliabue, M., & Umiltà, C. (2009). Response selection and attention orienting: A computational model of Simon effect asymmetries. Experimental Psychology, 56, 274–282.
Tucker, R., & Ellis, M. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8, 769–800.
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483–502.
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217.
Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: Action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–1769.