Acting Autonomously Versus not Acting Heteronomously
Tóm tắt
This paper presents a formal framework that purports to capture some aspects of Kant's theory of freedom. In particular, we argue that the analysis sheds further light on Kant's distinction between a negative and a positive concept of freedom. The paper shows that the two concepts are not equivalent: we not only argue that in a Kantian perspective negative freedom need not entail positive freedom, but also that there are situations in which a person can be said to be positively but not negatively free (in a Kantian sense).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allison, H.A. (1990), Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, H.A. (1993), Kant on freedom: Areply tomycritics, Inquiry, 36: 443–64.
Arrow, K.J. (1995). A note on freedom and flexibility, in: K. Basu, P.K. Pattanaik, K. Suzumura (eds.), Choice, Welfare, and Development. A Festschrift in Honor of Amartya K. Sen, pp. 7–16, Oxford: Clarendon.
Beck, L.W. (1960), A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beck, L.W. (1987). Five concepts of freedom in Kant, in: J.T.D. Srzednicki (ed.), Stephan Körner – Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction. Contributions to Philosophy, (pp. 35–51), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Berlin, I. (1969), Two concepts of liberty, in: I. Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty, (pp. 118–172), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, G. (1988), The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gravel, N., Laslier, J.-F. and Trannoy, A. (2000), Consistency between tastes and values: a universalization approach, Social Choice and Welfare, 17: 293–320
Hees, M. van (2000), Legal Reductionism and Freedom. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hill, Th. E. Jr. (1992), The Kantian conception of autonomy, in: Th. E. Hill Jr., Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Kant, I. (1785), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. transl. Mary Gregor, in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1788), Critique of Practical Reason, transl. Mary Gregor, in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1797), The Metaphysics of Morals, transl. Mary Gregor, in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pattanaik, P.K. and Xu, Y. (1990), On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice, Recherches Economiques de Louvain 56: 383–390
Pattanaik, P.K. and Xu, Y. (1998), On preference and freedom, Theory and Decision, 44: 173–198
Sen, A.K. (1988), Freedom of choice. Concept and content, European Economic Review, 32: 269–294
Sen, A.K. (1990), Welfare, freedom and social choice: A reply, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 56: 451–485
Sen, A.K. (1991), Welfare, preference and freedom, Journal of Econometrics, 50: 15–29
Suppes, P. (1987), Maximizing freedom of choice: an axiomatic analysis, in: G.R. Feiwel (ed.), Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. (pp. 243–254), Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Ullmann-Margalit, E. and Morgenbesser, S. (1977), Picking and choosing, Social Research, 44: 757–85
Wolff, R.P. (1973), The Autonomy of Reason. A Commentary on Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Harper and Row