Acid Etching and Surface Coating of Glass-Fiber Posts: Bond Strength and Interface Analysis

Brazilian Dental Journal - Tập 27 Số 2 - Trang 228-233 - 2016
Doglas Cecchin1, Ana Paula Farina1, Rafael Pino Vitti2, Rafael R. Moraes3, Ataís Bacchi4, Aloísio Oro Spazzin4
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, UPF - Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil
2Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, UNITAU - Universidade de Taubate, Taubate, SP, Brazil
3Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, UFPel - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
4Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, IMED - Faculdade Meridional, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil

Tóm tắt

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a composite resin to glass-fiber post (GFP) treated or not with phosphoric acid, silane coupling agent, and unfilled resin. GFPs were etched or not with 37% phosphoric acid and different surface coating applied: silane coupling agent, unfilled resin, or both. Composite resin blocks were built around a 4-mm height on the GFP. Unfilled resin (20 s) and composite resin (40 s) were light activated by a light-emitting diode unit. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. Microtensile bond test was performed using a mechanical testing machine until failure (n=10). The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls' test (p<0.05). Failure modes were classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive failures. Additional specimens (n=3) were made to analyze the bonded interfaces by scanning electron microscopy. The statistical analysis showed the factor 'surface coating' was significant (p<0.05), whereas the factor 'HP etching' (p=0.131) and interaction between the factors (p=0.171) were not significant. The highest bond strength was found for the silane and unfilled resin group (p<0.05). A predominance of adhesive and cohesive failures was found. Differences regarding the homogeneity and thickness of the unfilled resin layer formed by different GFP surface treatments were observed. The application of silane and unfilled resin can improve the bond strength between GFP and resin composite.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Tamse A., 2006, Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: diagnostic signs and clinical management, Endod Topics, 13, 84, 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2006.00200.x

Khaledi AR, 2015, Evaluation of retention of two different cast post-core systems and fracture resistance of the restored teeth, J Dent (Shiraz), 16, 121

Saraiva LO, 2013, Effect of different adhesion strategies on fiber post cementation: Push-out test and scanning electron microscopy analysis, Contemp Clin Dent, 4, 443, 10.4103/0976-237X.123022

Faria-e-Silva AL, 2013, Intra-radicular dentin treatments and retention of fiber posts with self-adhesive resin cements, Braz Oral Res, 27, 14, 10.1590/S1806-83242013000100003

Goracci C, 2005, The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts, J Endod, 31, 608, 10.1097/01.don.0000153841.23594.91

Liu C, 2014, The influence of four dual-cure resin cements and surface treatment selection to bond strength of fiber post, Int J Oral Sci, 6, 56, 10.1038/ijos.2013.83

Balbosh A, 2006, Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts, J Prosthet Dent, 95, 218, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.006

Radovic I, 2007, The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation, J Dent, 35, 496, 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.009

Mosharraf R, 2013, Effects of post surface conditioning before silanization on bond strength between fiber post and resin cement, J Adv Prosthodont, 5, 126, 10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.126

Davis P, 2010, Flexural strength of glass fibre-reinforced posts bonded to dual-cure composite resin cements, Eur J Oral Sci, 118, 197, 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00721.x

Faria MI, 2013, Tensile strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments, Braz Dent J, 24, 626, 10.1590/0103-6440201302365

Goracci C, 2011, Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review, Aust Dent J, 56, 77, 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x

Lamichhane A, 2014, Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review, J Adv Prosthodont, 6, 60, 10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.60

Eames WB, 1977, Bonding agents for repairing porcelain and gold: an evaluation, Oper Dent, 2, 118

Aida M, 1995, Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions, J Prosthet Dent, 73, 464, 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9

Novais VR, 2012, Bond strength between fiber posts and composite resin core: influence of temperature on silane coupling agents, Braz Dent J, 23, 8, 10.1590/S0103-64402012000100002

Perdigao J, 2006, The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts, Dent Mater, 22, 752, 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.002

Moraes AP, 2015, Can silanization increase the retention of glass-fiber posts? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies, Oper Dent, 40, 567, 10.2341/14-330-O

Naves LZ, 2010, Surface/interface morphology and bond strength to glass ceramic etched for different periods, Oper Dent, 35, 420, 10.2341/09-152-L

Carvalho RM, 2012, Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations, Dent Mater, 28, 72, 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011

Steinhauser HC, 2014, Micro-shear bond strength and surface micromorphology of a feldspathic ceramic treated with different cleaning methods after hydrofluoric acid etching, J Appl Oral Sci, 22, 85, 10.1590/1678-775720130339

Sano H, 1994, Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test, Dent Mater, 10, 236, 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1

Della Bona A, 2003, Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic, Dent Mater, 19, 693, 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00015-0

Matinlinna JP, 2004, An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry, Int J Prosthodont, 17, 155

Pape PG, 1991, Methods for improving the performance of silane coupling agents, J Adhes Sci Technol, 5, 831, 10.1163/156856191X00242