Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners

Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG (2007) Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 35(12):903–908

Schoenbaum TR (2010) Decoding CAD/CAM and digital impression units. Dent Today 29(2):140, 142, 144–145

Clancy JM, Scandrett FR, Ettinger RL (1983) Long-term dimensional stability of three current elastomers. J Oral Rehabil 10(4):325–333

Endo T, Finger WJ (2006) Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int 37(1):47–51

Jamani KD, Harrington E, Wilson HJ (1989) Rigidity of elastomeric impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 16(3):241–248

Shafa S, Zaree Z, Mosharraf R (2008) The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. J Contemp Dent Pract 9(6):49–56

Shetty P, Rodrigues S (2006) Accuracy of elastomeric impression materials on repeated pours. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 6(2):61–71

Wostmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M (2009) Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 22(2):158–160

Zweig A (2009) Improving impressions: go digital! Dent Today 28(11):100, 102, 104

Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139(6):761–763

Christensen GJ (2009) Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140(10):1301–1304

Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions—an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14(1):11–21

Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S (2005) Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 8(4):283–294

van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y (2012) Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7(8):e43312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043312

Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109(2):121–128. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1

Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T (2009) Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12(1):11–28

Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2012) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0

Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B (2012) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4

Babayoff N, Glaser-Inbari I (2000) Imaging a three-dimensional structure by confocal focussing an array of light beams. International Publication WO 00/08415

Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB, Stevens C, Cohen B (2009) 3D digital scanners: a high-tech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Insid Dent 5:70–74

Wachman ES, Niu W, Farkas DL (1997) AOTF microscope for imaging with increased speed and spectral versatility. Biophys J 73(3):1215–1222

Brandestini M, Moermann WH (1989) Method of and apparatus for making a prosthesis, especially a dental prosthesis. US Patent 4663720

Schwotzer A (2007) Measuring device and method that operates according to the basic principles of confocal microscopy. US Patent 2007/0296959

Thiel F, Pfeiffer J, Fornoff P (2008) Apparatus and method for optical 3D measurement. International Publication WO 2008/092791

Schmidt V (2010) 3D dental camera for recording surface structures of a measuring object by means of triangulation. International Publication WO 2010/012838 A1

Seitz G, Tiziani HJ (1996) Resolution limits of active triangulation systems by defocusing. Opt Eng 32(6):1374–1383

Kovács T (2004) Active triangulation scanner development focusing on the accuracy of the detection. In: 5th International Symposium of Hungarian Researchers: Sponsored by IEEE Computational Intelligence Chapter, Budapest, Magyarország, 2004.11.11–2004.11.12. pp 183–194

Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Caponi M, Governi L, Blois L (2011) A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet J Med Technol 5(1). http://ispub.com/IJMT/5/1/10082

Berner M (2010) Optical system for a confocal microscope. US Patent 2010/0085636

Figerio F (2006) 3-dimensional surface imaging using active wavefront sampling (PhD Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/38258

Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 14(2):239–256

Yang C, Medioni G (1992) Object modeling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vis Comput 10(3):145–155

Mada SK, Smith ML, Smith LN, Midha PS (2003) Overview of passive and active vision techniques for hand-held 3D data acquisition. In: Shearer A, Murtagh FD, Mahon J, Whelan PF (eds) Opto-Ireland 2002: Optical metrology, imaging, and machine vision, Galway, Ireland, 2002. SPIE Digital Library. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=879224