Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models
Tài liệu tham khảo
Profitt, 2000, Orthodontic diagnosis: the development of a problem list, 148
El-Zanaty, 2010, Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, 259, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.030
Zilberman, 2003, Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models, Angle Orthod, 73, 301
Fleming, 2011, Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review, Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, 1, 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x
Stevens, 2006, Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, 794, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023
Leifert, 2009, Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, 16.e1, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.019
Sousa, 2012, Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, 269, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.028
Kim, 2014, Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography, Angle Orthod, 84, 443, 10.2319/051213-365.1
Wiranto, 2013, Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, 140, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018
Flügge, 2013, Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, 471, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
Akyalcin, 2013, Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, 916, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.024
Jacob, 2015, Reliability and validity of intraoral and extraoral scanners, Prog Orthod, 16, 38, 10.1186/s40510-015-0108-7
Camardella, 2017, Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, 1178, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.012
Kim, 2018, Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153, 144, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.025
Brown, 2018, Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 154, 733, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.009
Cuperus, 2012, Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, 308, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031
Murugesan, 2012, Comparative evaluation of dimension and surface detail accuracy of models produced by three different rapid prototype techniques, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 12, 16, 10.1007/s13191-011-0103-8
Hazeveld, 2014, Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, 108, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011
Kim, 2014, Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique, Korean J Orthod, 44, 69, 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69
Wan Hassan, 2017, Comparison of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by 3-dimensional printing and conventional stone models with different degrees of crowding, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, 209, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.019
Keating, 2008, A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy, J Orthod, 35, 191, 10.1179/146531207225022626
American Association of Orthodontists. Pretreatment considerations: diagnostic records. 2017. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Available at: https://marketing.aaoinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-2019.pdf. Accessed November 2, 2018.