Accounting conservatism and the cost of equity capital: UK evidence

Managerial Finance - 2009
Ann L.‐C.Chan1, Stephen W.J.Lin2, NormanStrong3
1School of Management, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
2School of Accounting, College of Business, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
3Manchester Business School, Manchester, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the economic consequences of different dimensions of accounting conservatism: ex ante (balance sheet or unconditional) conservatism and ex post (earnings or conditional) conservatism. It is argued that the two dimensions of conservatism convey different information to the market about the quality of accounting numbers and have different associations with equity investors' required rates of return.Design/methodology/approachThe cost of equity capital estimates are based on the Ohlson and Juettner‐Nauroth model. The paper applies a regression model to examine the relationship between the cost of equity capital and accounting conservatism controlling for other risk factors.FindingsThe findings indicate that ex ante conservatism is associated with higher quality of accounting information and lower costs of equity capital and that ex post conservatism is associated with lower quality of accounting information and higher costs of equity capital.Research limitations/implicationsThe firm‐level conservatism measures may suffer from measurement error. Future studies can be more specific in determining proxies for ex ante and ex post conservatism.Practical implicationsThe results imply that conservative accounting signals information to investors about the quality of a firm's current and future earnings. Investors' required rates of returns may be higher for conservative reporting firms that are more susceptible to opportunistic management discretion.Originality/valueThe paper provides the first UK evidence on the effect of different dimensions of conservatism on equity investors' required rates of return.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ball, R. and Shivakumar, L. (2005), “Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 39, pp. 83‐128.

Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H. and Landsman, W.R. (1998), “Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 1‐34.

Basu, S. (1997), “The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 3‐37.

Beaver, W. and Ryan, S. (2000), “Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book‐to‐market ratio to predict book return on equity”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 38, pp. 127‐48.

Beaver, W. and Ryan, S. (2005), “Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modeling”, Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 269‐309.

Beaver, W., Pope, P., Ryan, S. and Walker, M. (2005), “Conditional and unconditional conservatism: empirics”, working paper, New York University, New York, NY.

Beekes, W., Pope, P. and Young, S. (2004), “The link between earnings timeliness, earnings conservatism and board composition: evidence from the UK”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 12, pp. 47‐59.

Cheng, A. and Liu, C. (2006), “The value relevance of earnings for conservative and non‐conservative firms”, working paper, University of Houston, Houston, TX.

Collins, D.W., Maydew, E.L. and Weiss, I.S. (1997), “Changes in the value relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 39‐67.

Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S. and O'Hara, M. (2002), “Is information risk a determinant of asset returns?”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 57, pp. 2185‐221.

Easton, P.D. (2004), “PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 73‐95.

Fama, E. and MacBeth, J. (1973), “Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 71, pp. 607‐36.

Feltham, J. and Ohlson, J.A. (1995), “Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 689‐731.

Francis, J. and Schipper, K. (1999), “Have financial statements lost their relevance?”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 37, pp. 319‐52.

Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. and Schipper, K. (2003), “Earnings quality and the pricing effects of earnings patterns”, working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. and Schipper, K. (2004), “Costs of equity and earnings attributes”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 79, pp. 967‐1010.

Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. and Schipper, K. (2005), “The market pricing of accruals quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 39, pp. 295‐327.

Givoly, D. and Hayn, C. (2000), “The changing time‐series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: has financial reporting become more conservative?”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 29, pp. 287‐320.

Givoly, D. and Hayn, C. (2002), “Rising conservatism: implications for financial analysis”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 58, pp. 56‐74.

Givoly, D., Hayn, C. and Natarajan, A. (2007), “Measuring reporting conservatism”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 82, pp. 65‐106.

Gode, D. and Mohanram, P. (2003), “Inferring the cost of capital using the Ohlson–Juettner model”, Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 399‐431.

Ohlson, J. and Juettner‐Nauroth, B. (2005), “Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinants of value”, Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 349‐65.

Pae, J., Thornton, D.B. and Welker, M. (2005), “The link between earnings conservatism and the price‐to‐book ratio”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 22, pp. 693‐717.

Penman, S. and Zhang, X. (2002), “Earnings conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, pp. 237‐64.

Pope, P. and Walker, M. (1999), “International differences in timeliness, conservatism and classification of earnings”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 37, Supplement, pp. 53‐99.

Pope, P. and Walker, M. (2003), “Ex ante and ex post accounting conservatism, asset recognition and asymmetric earnings timeliness”, working paper, Lancaster University, Lancaster and University of Manchester, Manchester.

Roychowdhury, S. and Watts, R. (2006), “Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market‐to‐book and conservatism in financial reporting”, working paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Watts, R.L. (2003a), “Conservatism in accounting part I: explanations and implications”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17, pp. 207‐21.

Watts, R.L. (2003b), “Conservatism in accounting part II: evidence and research opportunities”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17, pp. 287‐301.

White, H. (1980), “A heteroskedasticity‐consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity”, Econometrica, Vol. 48, pp. 817‐38.

Gebhardt, W.R., Lees, C.M. and Swaminathan, B. (2001), “Toward an implied cost of capital”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 39, pp. 135‐76.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Managerial Finance

Thông tin tác giả