Accessibility in Online Courses: a Review of National and Statewide Evaluation Instruments

Amado-Salvatierra, H., & Hilera, J. (2015). Towards an approach for an accessible and inclusive virtual education using ESVI-AL project results. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(3), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2015-0005.

Baldwin, S. J. (2019). Assimilation in online course design. The American Journal of Distance Education, 33(3), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1610304

Baldwin, S. & Ching, Y.-H. (2019). An online course design checklist: Development and users' perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1),156-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9199-8

Baldwin, S. J. & Ching, Y.-H. (2020). Guidelines for designing online courses for mobile devices. TechTrends, 64(3) 413-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00463-6

Baldwin, S., Ching, Y. -H., & Hsu, Y. -C. (2018). Online course design: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends, 62(3),46-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z

Axelrod, J. (2018). Making materials accessible to students in higher education institutes: Institutional obligations, methods of compliance, and recommendations for future action. Learned Publishing, 31, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1148.

Behling, K. (2017). Accessibility considerations for hybrid courses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(149), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20230.

Blackboard. (2020). Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric. http://edtech.hct.ac.ae/2019/10/24/blackboard-exemplary-course-program-rubric-course-design/

Blackboard. (2021, January 27). Accessibility at Blackboard. https://www.blackboard.com/blackboard-accessibility-commitment

Bureau of Internet Accessibility. (2017, 30 June). Alternative text: What and why? Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.boia.org/blog/alternative-text-what-and-why

Burgstahler, S. (2002). Distance learning: The library’s role in ensuring access to everyone. Library Hi Tech, 20(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830210452622.

Burgstahler, S. (2017, 30 January). ADA compliance for online course design. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/1/ada-compliance-for-online-course-design

California State University. (2017). Quality Learning and Teaching Instrument (QLT). http://courseredesign.csuprojects.org/wp/qualityassurance/qlt-informal-review/

California Virtual Campus-Online Education Initiative (CVC-OEI). (2020, April). California Community Colleges Online Education Initiative Online Course Design Rubric (OEI). https://onlinenetworkofeducators.org/course-design-academy/online-course-rubric/

Calle-Jimenez, T., Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2014). Web accessibility evaluation of massive open online courses on geographical information systems. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, April, 680–686. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826167.

Instructure. (2019). Canvas Course Evaluation Checklist, version 2.0 (CCEC). https://community.canvaslms.com/groups/strategies/blog/2019/12/21/course-evaluation-checklist-v20

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

CAST. (2020a). About UDL. UDL on campus. Universal Design for Learning in Higher Education. http://udloncampus.cast.org/page/udl_about

CAST. (2020b). Frequently asked questions. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/frequently-asked-questions

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Coding and content analysis. In: Research methods in education (7th ed., pp. 559–573). Routledge.

Cullipher, V. (2017, 28 November). OCR website accessibility complaints hit schools and universities. Microassist. https://www.microassist.com/digital-accessibility/school-website-accessibility-complaints/

Dell, C. A., Dell, T. F., & Blackwell, T. L. (2015). Applying universal design for learning in online courses: Pedagogical and practical considerations. The Journal of Educators Online, 13(2), 166–192 https://www.learntechlib.org/p/161396/.

Dello Stritto, M.E., & Linder, K. (2017, 28 August). Rising tide. How closed captions can benefit all students. Educausereview. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/8/a-rising-tide-how-closed-captions-can-benefit-all-students

Equity. (2020). In the Lexico dictionary. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/equity

Fermín-González, M. (2019). Research on virtual education, inclusion, and diversity: A systematic review of scientific publications (2007–2017). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(5), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4349.

Groves, K. (2020). The 6 simplest web accessibility tests anyone can do. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://karlgroves.com/2013/09/05/the-6-simplest-web-accessibility-tests-anyone-can-do

Illinois Online Network. (2019). Quality Online Course Initiative 2.0 (QOCI). https://uofi.app.box.com/s/61x1vascjn9ufkmagbyzw30lwu4jcz4o

Kachani, S., Ross, C., & Irvin, A. (2020, 19 February). 5 principles as pathways to inclusive teaching. Inside Higher Ed, The new accessibility: Students with disabilities and access to technology. https://www.insidehighered.com/content/new-accessibility-students-disabilities-and-access-technology

Kawas, S., Vonessen, L., & Ko, A. J. (2019, February). Teaching accessibility: A design exploration of faculty professional development at scale. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 983-989). https://faculty.washington.edu/ajko/papers/Kawas2019AccessibilityMicroPD.pdf

Kennedy, E.D. (2020, 1 May). The responsive website size guidelines. Learn UI Design Blog. [Blog post]. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://learnui.design/blog/mobile-desktop-website-font-size-guidelines.html

Kuang, C. (2016 February, 17). Microsoft’s radical bet on a new type of design thinking. FastCompany. https://www.fastcompany.com/3054927/microsofts-inspiring-bet-on-a-radical-new-type-of-design-thinking?utm_source=postup&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=issue-202&position=9&partner=newsletter&campaign_date=01122020

Linder, K. E., Fontaine-Rainen, D. L., & Behling, K. (2015). Whose job is it? Key challenges and future directions for online accessibility in US institutions of higher education. Open Learning, 30(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1007859.

Massengale, L. R., & Vasquez, E. (2016). Assessing accessibility: Are online courses better than face-to-face instruction at providing access to course content for students with disabilities? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i1.19101.

McKeown, C., & McKeown, J. (2019). Accessibility in online courses: Understanding the deaf learner. TechTrends, 63(5), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00385-3.

Microsoft. (2020). Make your PowerPoint presentations accessible to people with disabilities. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/make-your-powerpoint-presentations-accessible-to-people-with-disabilities-6f7772b2-2f33-4bd2-8ca7-dae3b2b3ef25

Moran, K. (2016). 20 March. How chunking helps content processing. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/chunking/.

National Association for the Deaf. (2015, 12 February). NAD sues Harvard and MIT for discrimination in public online content. www.nad.org/2015/02/17/nad-sues-harvard-and-mit-for-discrimination-in-public-online-content/

National Center on Universal Design for Learning. (2018). Q&A for higher education. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.queensu.ca/teachingandlearning/modules/principles/documents/About%20UDL.pdf

Online Learning Consortium. (2019). OLC Quality Scorecard: OSCQR Open SUNY Course Quality Review Rubric. https://s3.amazonaws.com/scorecard-private-uploads/OSCQR+version+3.1.pdf

OSCQR.SUNY.EDU. (2020). OSCQR is unique. OSCQR-SUNY Online Course Quality Review Rubric. https://oscqr.suny.edu/about/about-oscqr/oscqr-is-unique/

Portland Community College. (2021). Guidelines for adopting publisher content. Instructional Support. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.pcc.edu/instructional-support/accessibility/publishercontent/

Quality Matters. (2018). Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric (6th ed.) (QM). https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/StandardsfromtheQMHigherEducationRubric.pdf

Radovan, M., & Perdih, M. (2016). Developing guidelines for evaluating the adaptation of accessible web-based learning materials. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(4), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2463.

Regents of Minnesota. (2021). Links. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://accessibility.umn.edu/what-you-can-do/start-7-core-skills/links

Rice, M., & Oritz, K. (2020). Perceptions of accessibility in online course materials: A survey of teachers from six virtual schools. Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(3), 245-264.

Robinson, D. E., & Wizer, D. R. (2016). Universal design for learning and the quality Matters guidelines for the design and implementation of online learning events. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 17–32. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1213328.

Rodríguez, G., Pérez, J., Cueva, S., & Torres, R. (2017). A framework for improving web accessibility and usability of open course ware sites. Computers in Education, 109, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.013.

Rose, R. (2014). Access and equity for all learners in blended and online education. International association for K-12 online learning (iNACOL). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561307.pdf

Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2016). How could MOOCs become accessible? The case of edX and the future of inclusive online learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 22(1), 55–81. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301609137_How_Could_MOOCs_Become_Accessible_The_Case_of_edX_and_the_Future_of_Inclusive_Online_Learning.

SensusAccess. (2021). Service description. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.sensusaccess.com/service-description/

Struamshein, C. (2017, 6 March). Berkeley will delete online content. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved June 24, 2021, fromhttps://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/06/u-california-berkeley-delete-publicly-available-educational-content

Tobin, T. J. (2014). Increase online student retention with universal design for learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(3), 13–24. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from http://mathcs.duq.edu/~tobin/cv/QRDE.UDL.Article.pdf

U.S. Department of Education. (1973). Section 504 of the rehabilitation act of 1973. 29 U.S.C. Section 794. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/rehab/rehabilitation-act-of-1973-amended-by-wioa.pdf

U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Q&A: Title IV - Rehabilitation act amendments of 1998. Section 508: Electronic and information technology. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2009/02/18/deptofed.pdf

U.S. Department of Justice. (1990). Americans with disabilities act of 1990 104 STAT. 327. https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm

U.S. Department of Justice. (2015, 6 August). Information technology and people with disabilities: The current state of federal accessibility. Section II, Introduction. https://www.justice.gov/crt/introduction

U.S. General Services Administration. (2018). Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT). https://www.section508.gov/sell/vpat

UNC Charlotte. (2020). Universal design. The Center for Teaching & Learning. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://teaching.uncc.edu/services-programs/teaching-guides/online-and-blended-courses/universal-design

University of Washington. (2021a). How can principles of universal design be applied to technology-based math content? AccessComputing. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/how-can-principles-universal-design-be-applied-technology-based-math-content

University of Washington. (2021b). How do learning management systems differ on accessibility? AccessComputing. https://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/how-do-learning-management-systems-differ-accessibility

Vilcins, R. (2019, 24 September). Chrome accessibility extensions. Medium. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://medium.com/@vilcins/chrome-accessibility-extensions-90540341ddce

W3C World Wide Consortium (W3C). (2019b). W3C launches an Introduction to Web Accessibility free online course in cooperation with UNESCO IITE (press release). https://www.w3.org/2019/12/pressrelease-intro-web-accessibility-course.html.en

W3C World Wide Consortium (W3C). (2020a). Three flashes or below threshold: Understanding SC 2.3.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/seizure-does-not-violate.html

W3C World Wide Consortium (W3C). (2019a). Caption & summary. https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/tables/caption-summary/

W3C World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2020b). Understanding WCAG 2.1. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/

Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019). Familiarity, current use, and interest in universal Design for Learning among online university instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(5), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4258.

Witham, K., Malcom-Piqueux, L. E., Dowd, A. C., & Bensimon, E. M. (2015). America's unmet promise: The imperative for equity in higher education. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://secure.aacu.org/store/detail.aspx?id=GMSAUM