Access-site complications of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention using sheathless guiding catheters for acute coronary syndrome: a prospective cohort study with radial ultrasound follow-up
Tóm tắt
The advantages of sheathless guiding catheters over the conventional approach using sheaths in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) regarding access-site complications, particularly ultrasound-diagnosed radial artery occlusion (RAO), remain unknown. The present study investigated the incidence of access-site complications of transradial primary PCI using sheathless guiding catheters in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This prospective study evaluated access-site complications in 500 patients with ACS undergoing sheathless transradial primary PCI. Doppler ultrasound evaluation of the radial arteries was performed 2 and 30 days after the procedure. Sheathless guiding catheters (7.5-Fr) were used in 91.0% of the patients. The procedural success rate was 98.4%. Ultrasound-diagnosed RAO rates were 2.0% and 3.8% at 2- and 30-day follow-ups, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified that the sheath-to-artery ratio (per 0.1) (odds ratio [OR] 5.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–27.71; p = 0.001) was associated with more frequent RAO and that hypertension (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.06–0.81; p = 0.023) was associated with less frequent RAO. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a sheath-to-artery ratio of 1.47 was the cutoff for 30-day post-procedural RAO (sensitivity 72%, specificity 81%). Sheathless transradial primary PCI for ACS was associated with a low incidence of access-site complications and a higher sheath-to-artery ratio cutoff for RAO than that expected from conventional PCI using sheaths based on historical data, demonstrating the access-site safety of sheathless guiding catheters and their benefit in PCI for ACS (University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trial Registry Number UMIN000019931).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Rashid M, Kwok CS, Pancholy S, Chugh S, Kedev SA, Bernat I, et al. Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002686.
Mamas M, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG. Atraumatic complex transradial intervention using large bore sheathless guide catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:357–64.
Tada N, Takizawa K, Kahata M, Taguri M, Ootomo T, Inoue N. Sheathless guide catheter coronary intervention via radial artery: single-center experience with 9658 procedures. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27:237–41.
Horie K, Tada N, Isawa T, Matsumoto T, Taguri M, Kato S, et al. A randomised comparison of incidence of radial artery occlusion and symptomatic radial artery spasm associated with elective transradial coronary intervention using 6.5 Fr SheathLess Eaucath Guiding Catheter vs. 6.0 Fr Glidesheath Slender. EuroIntervention. 2018;13:2018–25.
Miyasaka M, Tada N, Kato S, Kami M, Horie K, Honda T, et al. Sheathless guide catheter in transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:1111–7.
Lozano I, Rondan J, Avanzas P, Suárez C. Rotational atherectomy through radial access with a 7.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheter. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:247–8.
Shishikura D, Otsuji S, Takiuchi S, Fukumoto A, Asano K, Ikushima M, et al. Vaporizing thrombus with excimer laser before coronary stenting improves myocardial reperfusion in acute coronary syndrome. Circ J. 2013;77:1445–52.
Zhao H, Banerjee S, Chen H, Li H. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for left main bifurcation lesions using 7.5-Fr sheathless guide catheter. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e0678.
Uhlemann M, Möbius-Winkler S, Mende M, Eitel I, Fuernau G, Sandri M, et al. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:36–43.
Sakatani T, Kawasaki T, Hadase M, Kamitani T, Kawasaki S, Sugihara H. Novel application of the hemostatic device TOMETA KUN. Circ J. 2003;67:895–7.
Rodriguez- Neithenfuhr M, Vazquez T, Nearn L, Ferreira B, Sanudo JR. Variation of the arterial pattern in the upper limb revisited: a morphological and statistical study, with arterial review of the literature. J Anat. 2001;199:547–66.
Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:173–8.
Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–47.
Rao SV, Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, Shah PB, Gulati R, Shroff AR, et al. Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention’s transradial working group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:228–36.
Maden O, Kafes H, Balci KG, Tola M, Selçuk MT, Burak C, et al. Relation between end-procedural activated clotting time values and radial artery occlusion rate with standard fixed-dose heparin after transradial cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:1455–9.
Avdikos G, Karatasakis A, Tsoumeleas A, Lazaris E, Ziakas A, Koutouzis M. Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:305–16.
Hahalis G, Aznaouridis K, Tsigkas G, Davlouros P, Xanthopoulou I, Koutsogiannis N, et al. Radial artery and ulnar artery occlusions following coronary procedures and the impact of anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005430.
Youn YJ, Yoon J, Han SW, Lee JW, Sung JK, Ahn SG, et al. Feasibility of transradial coronary intervention using a sheathless guiding catheter in patients with small radial artery. Korean Circ J. 2011;41:143–8.
Peruga JP, Peruga JZ, Kasprzak JD, Kręcki R, Jankowski Ł, Zając P, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of forearm arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: results of one-year follow-up. Kardiol Pol. 2015;73:502–10.
Buturak A, Tekturk BM, Degirmencioglu A, Ulus S, Surgit O, Ariturk C, et al. Transradial catheterization may decrease the radial artery luminal diameter and impair the vasodilatation response in the access site at late term: an observational study. Heart Vessels. 2016;31:482–9.
Buturak A, Gorgulu S, Norgaz T, Voyvoda N, Sahingoz Y, Degirmencioglu A, et al. The long-term incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion following a transradial coronary procedure. Cardiol J. 2014;21:350–6.
Bedford RF, Wollman H. Complications of percutaneous radial-artery cannulation: an objective prospective study in man. Anesthesiology. 1973;38:228–36.
Garg N, Sahoo D, Goel PK. Pigtail assisted tracking of guide catheter for navigating the difficult radial: overcoming the “razor effect”. Indian Heart J. 2016;68:355–60.
Hiraide T, Sawano M, Shiraishi Y, Ueda I, Numasawa Y, Noma S, et al. Impact of catheter-induced iatrogenic coronary artery dissection with or without postprocedural flow impairment: a report from a Japanese multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204333.
Costa F, van Leeuwen MA, Daemen J, Diletti R, Kauer F, van Geuns RJ, et al. The Rotterdam Radial Access Research: ultrasound-based radial artery evaluation for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary procedures. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003129.