Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations

Abreu, M., Grinevich, V. Hughes, A., Kitson, M., 2009. Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors, Centre for Business Research and UK∼IRC, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/pdf/AcademicSurveyReport.pdf (last accessed 10/8/2012).

Agrawal, 2006, Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 63, 10.1002/smj.508

Agrawal, 2002, Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT, Management Science, 48, 44, 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279

Azagra-Caro, 2007, What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university–industry interaction, Technovation, 27, 704, 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.003

Azagra-Caro, 2006, Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: the importance of regional absorptive capacity, Research Policy, 35, 37, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.007

Azoulay, 2007, The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: demographics or opportunities?, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 63, 599, 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.015

Baldini, 2006, Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: a study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002, Research Policy, 35, 518, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004

Barbolla, 2009, Critical factors for success in university-industry research projects, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21, 599, 10.1080/09537320902969133

Bearden, 1999

Bekkers, 2008, Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter?, Research Policy, 37, 1837, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007

Bercovitz, 2008, Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level, Organization Science, 19, 69, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0295

Bird, 1989, Faculty Entrepreneurship in Research University Environments, The Journal of Higher Education, 60, 583, 10.2307/1982268

Blumenthal, 1996, Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry, The New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1734, 10.1056/NEJM199612053352305

Boardman, 2008, Beyond the stars: The impact of affiliation with university biotechnology centers on the industrial involvement of university scientists, Technovation, 28, 291, 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.06.001

Boardman, 2009, Government centrality to university–industry interactions: university research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers, Research Policy, 38, 1505, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.008

Boardman, 2008, University research centers and the composition of research collaborations, Research Policy, 37, 900, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.012

Boardman, 2009, University researchers working with private companies, Technovation, 29, 142, 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.008

Bonaccorsi, 1994, A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university–industry relationships, R&D Management, 24, 229, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x

Bouty, 2000, Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries, The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 50, 10.2307/1556385

Bozeman, 2007, Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry, Research Policy, 36, 694, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007

Breschi, 2007, The scientific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from Italian data, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 101, 10.1080/10438590600982830

Campbell, 1999, Faculty and administrators’ attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships, The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 309, 10.2307/2649199

Campbell, 2000, Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials, Research Policy, 29, 303, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00068-2

Campbell, 2002, Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey, The Journal of American Medical Association, 287, 473, 10.1001/jama.287.4.473

Clarysse, 2005, Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 183, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004

Cohen, 2002, Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D, Management Science, 48, 1, 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273

Crane, 1972

Crant, 2000, Proactive behavior in organizations, Journal of Management, 26, 435, 10.1177/014920630002600304

D’Este, 2007, University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?, Research Policy, 36, 1295, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002

D’Este, 2011, Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316, 10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z

David, 2004, Understanding the emergence of ‘open science’ institutions: functionalist economics in historical context, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 571, 10.1093/icc/dth023

Di Gregorio, 2003, Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?, Research Policy, 32, 209, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5

Dutrenit, 2010, Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organisations and industry: comparing four Latin American countries, Science and Public Policy, 37, 541, 10.3152/030234210X512043

Etzkowitz, 1998, The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages, Research Policy, 27, 823, 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6

Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Uzzi, B., 2000a. Athena unbound: the advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Etzkowitz, 2000, The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29, 313, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4

Fabrizio, 2008, Commercializing the laboratory: faculty patenting and the open science environment, Research Policy, 37, 914, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.010

Fini, 2010, Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research, 1

Florida, 1999, Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development, 589

Friedland, 1991, Bringing society back in: symbols, practice, and institutional contradictions, 232

Geuna, 2001, The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?, Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 607, 10.1080/00213624.2001.11506393

Geuna, 2009, The governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature, Minerva, 47, 93, 10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2

Giuliani, 2010, Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy, Research Policy, 39, 748, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007

Godin, 2000, Impact of collaborative research on academic science, Science and Public Policy, 27, 65, 10.3152/147154300781782147

Goktepe-Hulten, 2010, University–industry technology transfer: who needs TTOs?, International Journal of Technology Transfer & Commercialisation, 9, 40, 10.1504/IJTTC.2010.029424

Goldfarb, 2003, Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property, Research Policy, 32, 639, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00034-3

Grimaldi, 2011, 30 years after Bayh–Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 40, 1045, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005

Grimpe, 2010, Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 637, 10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4

Gulbrandsen, 2007, The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model, 112

Gulbrandsen, 2005, Industry funding and university professors’ research performance, Research Policy, 34, 932, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004

Gupta, 2005, Triple burden on women in science. A cross-cultural analysis, Current Science, 89, 1382

Haeussler, 2011, Breaking the ivory tower: academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany, Research Policy, 40, 41, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.012

Henrekson, 2001, Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: lesson from the US and Sweden, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 207, 10.1023/A:1011153922906

Hicks, 1999, Does university–industry collaboration adversely affect university research?, Issues in Science and Technology, 15, 74

Huang, 2009, Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics, Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1193, 10.5465/AMJ.2009.47084665

Jain, 2009, Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity, Research Policy, 38, 922, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007

Jensen, 2001, Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions, American Economic Review, 91, 240, 10.1257/aer.91.1.240

Kenney, 2004, The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford, Research Policy, 33, 691, 10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001

Klofsten, 2000, Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—the case of Sweden and Ireland, Small Business Economics, 14, 299, 10.1023/A:1008184601282

Krabel, 2009, What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists, Research Policy, 38, 947, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.005

Kreiner, 1993, Informal collaboration in R&D: the formation of networks across organizations, Organization Studies, 14, 189, 10.1177/017084069301400202

Lach, 2008, Incentives and invention in universities, RAND Journal of Economics, 39, 403, 10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x

Lam, 2010, From ‘ivory tower traditionalists’ to ‘entrepreneurial scientists’?. Academic scientists in fuzzy university-industry boundaries, Social Studies of Science, 40, 307, 10.1177/0306312709349963

Lambert, R., 2003. Lambert review of business-university collaboration: Final report. HM Treasury, London.

Landry, 2006, Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities, Research Policy, 35, 1599, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.020

Larsen, 2011, The implications of academic enterprise for public science: an overview of the empirical evidence, Research Policy, 40, 6, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.013

Lee, 1996, ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university–industry collaboration, Research Policy, 25, 843, 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00857-8

Lee, 1998, University–industry collaboration on technology transfer: Views from the Ivory Tower, Policy Studies Journal, 26, 69, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01925.x

Lee, 2000, The sustainability of university–industry research collaboration: an empirical assessment, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111, 10.1023/A:1007895322042

Lee, 2005, The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35, 673, 10.1177/0306312705052359

Liebeskind, 1996, Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms, Organization Science, 7, 428, 10.1287/orsc.7.4.428

Lin, 2006, Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: a scientific and technical human capital explanation, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 269, 10.1007/s10961-005-6111-2

Link, 2007, An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 641, 10.1093/icc/dtm020

Lissoni, 2008, Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database, Research Evaluation, 17, 87, 10.3152/095820208X287171

Lissoni, F., Llerena, P. et al., 2009. Academic patenting in Europe: evidence from France, Italy and Sweden from the KEINS database. Learning to Compete in European Universities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 187–218.

Lockett, 2005, Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies, Research Policy, 34, 1043, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006

Louis, 1989, Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 110, 10.2307/2392988

Louis, 2001, Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: a comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 233, 10.1023/A:1011106006976

Mansfield, 1995, Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing, Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 55, 10.2307/2109992

Markman, 2005, Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market, Research Policy, 34, 1058, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007

Markman, 2005, Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 241, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003

Markman, 2008, Research and technology commercialization, Journal of Management Studies, 45, 1401, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x

Martinelli, 2008, Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 259, 10.1007/s10961-007-9031-5

McKelvey, 2009

Merton, 1968, The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered, Science, 159, 56, 10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Merton, 1973

Meyer, 2003, Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms, R&D Management, 33, 107, 10.1111/1467-9310.00286

Meyer-Krahmer, 1998, Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields, Research Policy, 27, 835, 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8

Mintzberg, H., 1979. The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs; London [etc.].

Moutinho, 2007, Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations, Scientometrics, 70, 355, 10.1007/s11192-007-0207-4

Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., 2004. Ivory tower and industrial innovation: university–industry technology before and after the Bayh–Dole Act. Stanford University Press, Stanford, p. 304.

Mowery, 2005, The Bayh–Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments?, Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 115, 10.1007/s10961-004-4361-z

Mowery, 2001, The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980, Research Policy, 30, 99, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6

Murray, 2010, The Oncomouse that roared: hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions, American Journal of Sociology, 116, 341, 10.1086/653599

Murray, 2007, Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 657, 10.1093/icc/dtm021

Murray, 2007, Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 63, 648, 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.017

Nilsson, 2010, Transfer of academic research: uncovering the grey zone, Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 617, 10.1007/s10961-009-9124-4

O'Shea, 2005, Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities, Research Policy, 34, 994, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011

O'Shea, 2008, Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 653, 10.1007/s10961-007-9060-0

Owen-Smith, 2001, To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 99, 10.1023/A:1007892413701

Pawson, 2006

Perkmann, 2007, University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259, 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x

Perkmann, 2008, Engaging the scholar: three forms of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry, Research Policy, 37, 1884, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009

Perkmann, 2009, The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university–industry relations on public research, Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 1033, 10.1093/icc/dtp015

Perkmann, 2011, Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry, Research Policy, 40, 539, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.007

Perkmann, 2012, How to create productive partnerships with universities, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 79

Phan, 2006, The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from qualitative and quantitative research in the US and UK, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2, 66, 10.1561/0300000006

Phan, 2005, Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 165, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001

Podsakoff, 2003, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Ponomariov, 2008, Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 485, 10.1007/s10961-007-9047-x

Ponomariov, 2008, The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 301, 10.1007/s10961-007-9029-z

Powers, 2005, University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 291, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008

Rawlings, 2011, Influence flows in the academy: using affiliation networks to assess peer effects among researchers, Social Science Research, 40, 1001, 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.10.002

Renault, 2006, Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 227, 10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x

Rothaermel, 2007, University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 691, 10.1093/icc/dtm023

Salter, 2001, The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review, Research Policy, 30, 509, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3

Sampat, 2003, Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh–Dole act: a re-examination, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1371, 10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00087-0

Schartinger, 2002, Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants, Research Policy, 31, 303, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1

Senker, 1995, Tacit knowledge and models of innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change, 4, 425, 10.1093/icc/4.2.425

Shane, 2004

Shinn, 2006, Paths of commercial knowledge: forms and consequences of university-enterprise synergy in scientist-sponsored firms, Research Policy, 35, 1465, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.024

Siegel, 2003, Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, Research Policy, 32, 27, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2

Sine, 2003, The halo effect and technology licensing: the influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions, Management Science, 49, 478, 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416

Stuart, 2006, When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences, American Journal of Sociology, 112, 97, 10.1086/502691

Thursby, 2002, Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing, Management Science, 48, 90, 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271

Thursby, 2001, Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major US universities, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59, 10.1023/A:1007884111883

Thursby, J., Fuller, A., Thursby, M., 2007. US faculty patenting: inside and outside the university. NBER Working Paper 13256.

Toole, 2010, Commercializing science: is there a university brain drain from academic entrepreneurship?, Management Science, 56, 1599, 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1192

Tranfield, 2003, Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review, British Journal of Management, 14, 207, 10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Van Dierdonck, 1990, University–industry relationships: how does the Belgian academic community feel about it?, Research Policy, 19, 551, 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90012-U

van Rijnsoever, 2008, A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers, Research Policy, 37, 1255, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.020

Walsh, 2008, Promoting university–industry linkages in Japan: faculty responses to a changing policy environment, Prometheus, 26, 39, 10.1080/08109020701846025

Welsh, 2008, Close enough but not too far: assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism, Research Policy, 37, 1854, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010

Wright, 2007