Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization

David D. Dill1
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill

Tóm tắt

Over the last decade universities have been subjected to various forms of academic accountability designed to maintain or improve the quality of their teaching and learning. A shared perspective of many of these accountability processes is that universities should become skilled at creating knowledge for the improvement of teaching and learning, and at modifying their behavior to reflect this new knowledge. In short, that universities should become “learning organizations.” What are the organizational characteristics of an academic learning organization? The paper will address this question by reviewing the adaptations in organizational structure and governance reported by universities attempting to improve the quality of their teaching and learning processes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, P. (1990). 'Shared learning', Management Science36(8), 938-957.

Adler, P. (1993). 'Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants', Sloan Management Review3, 85-94.

Ashby, E. (1963). 'Decision making in the academic world', in Halmos, P. (ed.), Sociological Studies in British University Education. Keele: University of Keele, pp. 93-100.

Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.

Braxton, J.M. and Hargens, L.L. (1996). 'Variations among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research', in Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon Press.

Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

Clark, B.R. (1998). The Entrepreneurial University. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Cohen, M.D. and March, J.G. (1986). Leadership and Ambiguity (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Cohen, M.D. and Sproull, L.S. (eds.) (1996). Organizational Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Demsetz, H. (1991). 'The theory of the firm revisited', in Williamson, O.E. and Winter, S.G. (eds.), The Nature of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 159-178.

Dill, D.D. (1992). 'Quality by design: Toward a framework for academic quality management', in Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 8. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 37-83.

Dill, D.D. (1995). 'Through Deming's eyes: A cross-national analysis of quality assurance policies in higher education', Quality in Higher Education1(2), 95-110.

Dill, D.D. (1997). 'Quality assurance policies and their impacts on academic institutions', LLinE2(4), 200-208.

Dill, D.D. (1999). 'Student learning and academic choice: The rule of coherence', in Brennan, J., Fedrowitz, J., Huber, M. and Shah, T. (eds.), What Kind of University? International Perspectives on Knowledge, Participation and Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 56-70.

Dill, D.D. and Sporn, B. (1995). 'University 2001: What will the university of the twenty-first century look like?', in Dill, D.D. and Sporn, B. (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 212-236.

Easterby-Smith, M. (1997). 'Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques', Human Relations50(9), 1085-1113.

Garvin (1993). 'Building a learning organization', Harvard Business Review71(4), 78-84.

Gibbons, M. (1995). 'The university as an instrument for the development of science and basic research: The implications of mode 2 science', in Dill, D.D. and Sporn, B. (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 90-104.

Grant, R.M. (1996). 'Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration', Organization Science7(4), 375-387.

Gumport, P. and Sporn, B. (1999). 'Organizational adaptation and restructuring in higher education', in Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 104-145.

Hayes, R.H., Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B. (1988). Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization. New York: Free Press.

Hedberg, B.L., Nystrom, P.C. and Starbuck, W.H. (1976). 'Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization', Administrative Science Quarterly2, 39-52.

Henderson, R.M. and Clark, K.B. (1990). 'Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms', Administrative Science Quarterly35, 9-30.

Huber, G.P. (1991). 'Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature', Organization Science2, 88-115.

Kerr, C. (1993). 'Universal issues in the development of higher education', in Balderston, J.B. and Balderston, F.E. (eds.), Higher Education in Indonesia: Evolution and Reform. Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California Press, pp. 19-35.

Kim, D.H. (1993). 'The link between individual and organizational learning', Sloan Management Review35(1), 37-50.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). 'Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development', Strategic Management Journal13, 111-125.

Levitt, B. and March, J.G. (1988). 'Organizational learning', Annual Review of Sociology14, 319-340.

March, J.G. (1991). 'Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning', Organization Science2(1), 71-87.

March, J.G., Sproull, L.S. and Tamuz, M. (1991). 'Learning from samples of one or fewer', Organization Science2(1), 1-13.

Massy, W.F. (ed.) (1996). Resource Allocation in Higher Education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Mets, L. (1997). 'Program review', in Peterson, M.W., Dill, D.D. and Mets, L.A. (eds.), Planning and Management for a Changing Environment: A Handbook on Redesigning Postsecondary Institutions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 88-105.

Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). 'Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony', American Journal of Sociology83, 440-463.

Neave, G. (1988). 'On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in western Europe, 1986-1988', European Journal of Education23(1/2), 7-23.

Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights From Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Peace-Lenn, M. (1997) 'Introduction', in Peace-Lenn, M. and Campos, L.B. (eds.), Globalization of the Professions and the Quality Imperative: Trade Agreements and Professional Accreditation, Certification, and Licensure. Madison, WI: Magna.

Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990). 'The core competence of the corporation', Harvard Business Review3, 79-91.

Rothschild, M. and White, L.J. (1993). 'The university in the marketplace: Some insights and some puzzles', in Clotfelter, C.T. and Rothschild, M. (eds.), Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11-37.

Senge, P. (1990a). The Fifth Dimension: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

Senge, P. (1990b). 'The leader's new work: Building learning organizations', Sloan Management Review32(1), 7-23.

Shulman, L.S. (1993). 'Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude', Change25, 6-7.

Szulanski, G. (1996). 'Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm', Strategic Management Journal17, 27-43.

Trow, M.A. (1983). 'Organizing the biological sciences at Berkeley', Change15, 28-53.

Tsang, E.W.K. (1997). 'Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research', Human Relations50(1), 73-89.

Wildavsky, A. (1972). 'The self-evaluating organization', Public Administration Review32(5), 509-520.