Abstraction, Multiple Exemplar Training and the Search for Derived Stimulus Relations in Animals
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baer, D. M., & Sherman, J. A. (1964). Reinforcement control of generalized imitation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1(1), 37–49.
Baillargeon, R., & Carey, S. (2012). Core cognition and beyond: the acquisition of physical and numerical knowledge. In S. M. Pauen & S. M. Pauen (Eds.), Early childhood development and later outcome (pp. 33–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, C. S., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2013). Advances in language interventions based on relational frame theory for individuals with developmental disorders. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: research and application (pp. 151–177). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Testing and training relational responding in accordance with the relational frame of opposite in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 559–586.
Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991a). Analyzing the reinforcement process at the human level:can application and behavioristic interpretation replace laboratory research? The Behavior Analyst, 14, 95–105.
Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991b). The experimental analysis of human behavior: indispensible, ancillary, or irrelevant. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 145–155.
Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45–71.
Bloom, P. (2010). How pleasure works: the new science of why we like what we like. New York, NY: Random House.
Bodily, K. D., Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2008). Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34(1), 178–184.
Brino, A. L., Campos, R. S., Galvão, O. F., & McIlvane, W. J. (2014b). Blank-comparison matching-to-sample reveals a false positive symmetry test in a capuchin monkey. Psychology & Neuroscience, 7, 193–198.
Brino, A. L., Galvão, O. F., Picanco, C. R. F., Barros, R. S., Souza, C. B. A., Goulart, B. R. K., & McIlvane, W. J. (2014a). Generalized identity matching after multiple exemplar-training in capuchin monkeys. Psychological Record, 64, 693–704.
Campos, H. C., Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. (2014). Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 10–25.
Carter, D. E., & Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565–601.
Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning, 5th Ed. Cornwall on Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.
Cook, R. G., Kelly, D. M., & Katz, J. S. (2003). Successive two-item same-different discrimination and concept learning by pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 62, 125–144.
Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2010). Using stimulus equivalence technology to teach statistical inference in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 763–768.
Cumming, W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostovsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Daniel, T. A., Goodman, A. M., Thompkins, A. M., Forloines, M. R., Lazarowski, L., & Katz, J. S. (2016). Generalization cannot predict abstract-concept learning. In M. C. Olmstead (Ed.), Animal cognition: principles, evolution and development (pp. 131–145). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Daniel, T. A., Wright, A. A., & Katz, J. S. (2015). Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons. Animal cognition, 18, 831–837.
Deacon, T. W. (1998). The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1996). Implications of stimulus control topography analysis for emergent behavior and stimulus classes. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Advances in psychology: stimulus class formation in humans and animals (Vol. 117, pp. 197–220). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., Callahan, T. D., & Stoddard, L. T. (1993). The search for stimulus equivalence in nonverbal organisms. The Psychological Record, 43, 761–778.
Dugdale, N., & Lowe, C. F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5–22.
Dymond, S. (2014). Meaning is more than associations: relational operants and the search for derived relations in nonhumans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 152–155.
Frank, A. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (2005). Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84(2), 147–165.
Galizio, M. (2003). The abstracted operant: a review of Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 159–169.
Gomez, J., Garcia, A., & Perez, V. (2014). Failure to find symmetry in pigeons after multiple exemplar training. Psicothema, 26, 435–441.
Gorham, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Berens, N. (2009). Derived comparative and transitive relations in young children with and without autism. The Psychological Record, 59, 221–246.
Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 321–334.
Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior: the first international institute on verbal relations (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Hayes, S. C. (2016). Why contextual behavior science exists: an introduction to part 1. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 9–16). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. T. (2014). Cooperation came first: evolution and human cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 112–129.
Heagle, A. I., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2006). Teaching perspective-taking skills to typically developing children through derived relational responding. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 3, 1–34.
Hogan, D. E., & Zentall, T. R. (1977). Backward associations in the pigeon. The American Journal of Psychology, 3–15.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241.
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Associative concept learning, stimulus equivalence, and relational frame theory: working out the similarities and differences between human and nonhuman behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 156–160.
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). Relational frame theory: the basic account. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 129–178). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Iversen, I. H. (1997). Matching-to-sample performance in rats: a case of mistaken identity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68(1), 27–45.
Iversen, I. H., Sidman, M., & Carrigan, P. (1986). Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 297–304.
Kastak, C. R., Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131–158.
Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2006). Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 80–86.
Katz, J. S., Wright, A. A., & Bachevalier, J. (2002). Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: animal Behavior Processes, 28, 358–368.
Katz, J. S., Wright, A. A., & Bodily, K. D. (2007). Issues in the comparative cognition of abstract-concept learning. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 2, 79–92.
Kohler, W. (1918/1938). Simple structural functions in the chimpanzee and in the chicken. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 217–227). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Lawrence, D. H., & DeRivera, J. (1954). Evidence for relational transposition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 465–471.
Lazareva, O. F. (2012). Relational learning in a context of transposition: a review. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 231–248.
Lazareva, O. F., Miner, M., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2008). Multiple-pair training enhances transposition in pigeons. Learning & Behavior, 36, 174–187.
Lazareva, O. F., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2005). Transposition in pigeons: reassessing Spence (1937) with multiple discrimination training. Animal Learning & Behavior, 33, 22–46.
Lazareva, O. F., Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (2014). A three-component model of relational responding in the transposition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 63–80.
Lionello, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1998). Control by sample location in pigeons matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 235–251.
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. (2009). The search for symmetry: 25 years in review. Learning & Behavior, 37, 188–203.
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 467–495.
Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201–239.
Lipkens, R., Kop, P. F., & Matthijs, W. (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395–409.
Luciano, C., Becerra, I. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349–365.
Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). Abstraction and discrimination. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.), The evolution of cognition (pp. 123–141). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McIlvane, W. J. (2013). Simple and complex discrimination learning. In G. J. Madden, W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis, Translating principles into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 129–163). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
McIlvane, W. J. (2014). “Associative concept learning in animals” by Zentall, Wasserman, and Urcuioli: a commentary. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 161–164.
McIlvane, W. J., & Dube, W. V. (2003). Stimulus control topography coherence theory: foundations and extensions. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 195–213.
McIlvane, W. J., Serna, R. W., Dube, W. V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 85–110). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Neuringer, A. (2002). Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 672–705.
Oden, D. L., Thompson, R. K., & Premack, D. (1988). Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 140–145.
O'Donnell, J., & Saunders, K. J. (2003). Equivalence relations in individuals with language limitations and mental retardation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80(1), 131–157.
Pelaez, M., Gewirtz, J. L., Sanchez, A., & Mahabir, N. M. (2000). Exploring stimulus equivalence formation in infants. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 9, 20–25.
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 109–130.
Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1996). Stimulus equivalence: a class of correlations, or a correlation of classes? In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Advances in psychology: stimulus class formation in humans and animals (Vol. 117, pp. 173–195). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (2000). Stimulus equivalence and units of analysis. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 111–126). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Pilgrim, C., Jackson, J., & Galizio, M. (2000). Acquisition of arbitrary conditional discriminations by young normally developing children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 177–193.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: the new science of language and mind. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Premack, D. (1978). On the abstractness of human concepts: why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. E. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 423–451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Prichard, A., Panoz-Brown, D., Bruce, K., & Galizio, M. (2015). Emergent identity but not symmetry following successive olfactory discrimination training in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104(2), 133–145.
Reese, H. W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations: discrimination learning and transposition. New York: Academic.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1986). Ape language: from conditioned response to symbol. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823.
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146.
Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44.
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1976). About behaviorism. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430–444.
Suddendorf, T. (2013). The gap: the science of what separates us from other animals. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.
Sweeney, M. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2010). Reflexivity in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 267–282.
Urcuioli, P. J. (2008). Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeon’s equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 257–282.
Urcuioli, P. J. (2011). Emergent identity matching after successive matching training, I: reflexivity or generalized identity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 329–341.
Urcuioli, P. J. (2015). A successful search for symmetry. Conductual, 3, 4–25.
Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. (2012a). A replication and extension of the antisymmetry effect in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98, 283–293.
Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. (2012b). Emergent identity matching after successive matching training. II: reflexivity or transitivity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 5–27.
Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. J. (2015). Transitive and anti-transitive emergent relations in pigeons: support for a theory of stimulus-class formation. Behavioural Processes, 112, 49–60.
Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., Jackson-Smith, P., & Steirn, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15(3), 264–273.
Vaughn, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.
Velasco, S. M., Huziwara, E. M., Machado, A., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2010). Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 283–295.
Waxman, S. R., & Gelman, S. A. (2010). Different kinds of concepts and different kinds of words: what words to for human cognition. In D. Mareschal, P. C. Quinn, & S. E. G. Lea (Eds.), The making of human concepts (pp. 99–130). NY: Oxford University Press.
Weil, T. M., Hayes, S. C., & Capurro, P. (2011). Establishing a deictic relational repertoire in young children. The Psychological Record, 61, 371–390.
Wright, A. A., Magnotti, J. F., Katz, J. S., Leonard, K., & Kelly, D. M. (2016). Concept learning set-size functions for Clark’s nutcrackers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105(1), 76–84.
Wright, A. A., Magnotti, J. F., Katz, J. S., Leonard, K., Vernouillet, A., & Kelly, D. M. (2017). Corvids outperform pigeons and primates in learning a basic concept. Psychological Science, 28, 437–444.
Wright, A. A., Rivera, J. J., Katz, J. S., & Bachevalier, J. (2003). Abstract-concept learning and list-memory processing by capuchin and rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29(3), 184–198.
Yamamoto, J. I., & Asano, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). The Psychological Record, 45, 3–21.
Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2014). Associative concept learning in animals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 130–151.