ANALYSIS OF STOCHASTIC PROCESS TO MODEL SAFETY RISK IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management - Tập 27 Số 2 - Trang 87-99 - 2021
Zhenhao Zhang1, Wenbiao Li1, Jianyu Yang1
1School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China

Tóm tắt

There are many factors leading to construction safety accident. The rule presented under the influence of these factors should be a statistical random rule. To reveal those random rules and study the probability prediction method of construction safety accident, according to stochastic process theory, general stochastic process, Markov process and normal process are respectively used to simulate the risk-accident process in this paper. First, in the general-random-process-based analysis the probability of accidents in a period of time is calculated. Then, the Markov property of the construction safety risk evolution process is illustrated, and the analytical expression of probability density function of first-passage time of Markov-based risk-accident process is derived to calculate the construction safety probability. In the normal-process-based analysis, the construction safety probability formulas in cases of stationary normal risk process and non-stationary normal risk process with zero mean value are derived respectively. Finally, the number of accidents that may occur on construction site in a period is studied macroscopically based on Poisson process, and the probability distribution of time interval between adjacent accidents and the time of the nth accident are calculated respectively. The results provide useful reference for the prediction and management of construction accidents.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.ces.2018.05.045

10.1016/j.ces.2018.10.024

10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.052

Ang, A. H.-S., 2007, Probability concepts in engineering – emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering

10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106697

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.001

10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103974

10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.001

10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.004

10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104594

10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00013-9

10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104802

10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.060

Faber, M. H., 2003, Risk and safety in civil, surveying and environmental engineering

10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.012

10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.013

10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.011

10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.088

10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.024

10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.006

10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.007

10.1016/j.aei.2020.101062

10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.034

10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003

10.1016/j.ress.2014.01.015

10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103127

Li, G., 1993, Structural dynamic reliability theory and application

10.3724/SP.J.1235.2010.00232

10.1016/B978-008045312-5/50032-7

10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101212

10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.015

Ross, S. M., 1996, Stochastic processes (2nd ed.)

10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.044

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.019

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.005

10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00079-5

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.209-211.1402

10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:1(96)

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.006

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.015

10.1016/j.aap.2011.06.017

Yang, W.-J., 2011, Structural dynamic reliability study based on first-passage time probability analysis of continuous Markov processes, Engineering Mechanics, 28, 124

10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.09.004

10.1016/j.jsr.2018.11.006

10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.038

10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106389

10.1080/19648189.2019.1601134

10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.005

10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103050

10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.009