AIoT-enabled smart surveillance for personal data digitalization: Contextual personalization-privacy paradox in smart home
Tài liệu tham khảo
Gati, 2021, Differentially private data fusion and deep learning framework for cyber–physical–social systems: state-of-the-art and perspectives, Inf. Fusion, 76, 298, 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.017
Turel, 2019, The Digitization of the individual (DOTI), Inf. Syst. J.
Leidner, 2021, The care theory of dignity amid personal data digitalization, MIS Q., 45, 343, 10.25300/MISQ/2021/15941
Cichy, 2021, Privacy concerns and data sharing in the internet of things: mixed methods evidence from connected cars, MIS Q., 45, 1863, 10.25300/MISQ/2021/14165
Jiang, 2020, It-enabled self-monitoring for chronic disease self-management: an interdisciplinary review, MIS Q., 44, 451, 10.25300/MISQ/2020/15108
Langheinrich, 2014, Quo vadis smart surveillance? How smart technologies combine and challenge democratic oversight, 151
Matt, 2019, The digitization of the individual: conceptual foundations and opportunities for research, Electron. Mark., 29, 315, 10.1007/s12525-019-00348-9
D'Arcy, 2009, User awareness of security countermeasures and its impact on information systems misuse: a deterrence approach, Inf. Syst. Res., 20, 79, 10.1287/isre.1070.0160
Dhir, 2019, Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 193, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.021
Martin, 2016, An eye on your work: how empowerment affects the relationship between electronic surveillance and counterproductive work behaviours, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., 27, 2635, 10.1080/09585192.2016.1225313
McNall, 2007, Effects of electronic monitoring types on perceptions of procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and privacy, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 37, 658, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00179.x
Xiao, 2019, Exploring the antecedents of social network service fatigue: a socio-technical perspective, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 119, 2006, 10.1108/IMDS-04-2019-0231
Dinev, 2008, Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance – an empirical investigation, J. Strategic Inf. Syst., 17, 214, 10.1016/j.jsis.2007.09.002
Nelson, 2016, Health empowerment through activity trackers: an empirical smart wristband study, Comput. Hum. Behav., 62, 364, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.065
Shore, 2022, To share or not to share: extending protection motivation theory to understand data sharing with the police, Comput. Hum. Behav., 130, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107188
Yost, 2018, Reactance to electronic surveillance: a test of antecedents and outcomes, J. Bus. Psychol., 34, 71, 10.1007/s10869-018-9532-2
Benlian, 2020, Mitigating the intrusive effects of smart home assistants by using anthropomorphic design features: a multimethod investigation, Inf. Syst. J., 30, 1010, 10.1111/isj.12243
Lanzing, 2018, Strongly recommended” revisiting decisional privacy to judge hypernudging in self-tracking technologies, Philos. Technol., 32, 549, 10.1007/s13347-018-0316-4
Suh, 2007, 966
West, 2019, Amazon: surveillance as a Service, Surveill. Soc., 17, 27, 10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.13008
Princi, 2020, I spy with my little sensor eye - effect of data-tracking and convenience on the intention to use smart technology, 10.24251/HICSS.2020.171
Calo, 2010, People can be so fake: a new dimension to privacy and technology scholarship, Penn State Law Rev., 114, 809
Lee, 2020, Home Iot resistance: extended privacy and vulnerability perspective, Telemat. Informat.
Choi, 2017, Examining the effects of personalized app recommender systems on purchase intention: a self and social interaction perspective, J. Electron. Commerce Res., 18, 73
Gutierrez, 2019, Using privacy calculus theory to explore entrepreneurial directions in mobile location-based advertising: identifying intrusiveness as the critical risk factor, Comput. Hum. Behav., 95, 295, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.015
Tam, 2006, Understanding the impact of web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes, MIS Q., 30, 865, 10.2307/25148757
Xu, 2012, Measuring mobile users' concerns for information privacy
Xu, 2011, The personalization privacy paradox: an exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing, Decis. Support Syst., 51, 42, 10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017
Ibarra-Esquer, 2017, Tracking the evolution of the internet of things concept across different application domains, Sensors (Basel), 17, 1, 10.3390/s17061379
Li, 2019, Iot data feature extraction and intrusion detection system for smart cities based on deep migration learning, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 49, 533, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.006
Ives, 2016, Enhancing customer service through the internet of things and digital data streams, MIS Q. Executive, 15, 279
Nelson, 2005, Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 21, 199, 10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823
Shin, 2014, A socio-technical framework for internet-of-things design: a human-centered design for the internet of things, Telemat. Inform., 31, 519, 10.1016/j.tele.2014.02.003
Vagts, 2012, User-centric protection and privacy in smart surveillance systems, 237
Harvey, 2020, The smart home: how consumers craft new service networks by combining heterogeneous smart domestic products, J. Service Res., 23, 504, 10.1177/1094670520929095
Yang, 2017, User Acceptance of smart home services: an extension of the theory of planned behavior, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 117, 68, 10.1108/IMDS-01-2016-0017
2021
Mulcahy, 2019, Are households ready to engage with smart home technology?, J. Mark. Manag., 35, 1370, 10.1080/0267257X.2019.1680568
Chouk, 2019, Factors for and against resistance to smart services-role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables, J. Services Mark., 33, 449, 10.1108/JSM-01-2018-0046
Dong, 2017, Understanding usage of internet of things (Iot) systems in China, Inf. Technol. People, 30, 117, 10.1108/ITP-11-2015-0272
Hubert, 2019, The influence of acceptance and adoption drivers on smart home usage, Eur. J. Mark., 53, 1073, 10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0794
Khasawneh, 2022, Enhancing smart system platforms: factors affecting people's intentions toward smart homes in Jordan, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact. (IJTHI), 18, 1, 10.4018/IJTHI.293202
Nikou, 2019, Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: an empirical assessment, Telemat. Inform., 45, 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101283
Park, 2017, Comprehensive approaches to user acceptance of internet of things in a smart home environment, IEEE Internet Things J., 4, 2342, 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750765
Boer, 2019, Accepting the internet-of-things in our homes: the role of user skills, Telemat. Inform., 36, 147, 10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.004
Kim, 2017, A study on the adoption of Iot smart home service: using value-based adoption model, Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excellence, 28, 1149, 10.1080/14783363.2017.1310708
Mamonov, 2021, Unlocking the smart home: exploring key factors affecting the smart lock adoption intention, Inf. Technol. People, 34, 835, 10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0357
Shin, 2018, Who will be smart home users? An analysis of adoption and diffusion of smart homes, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 134, 246, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.029
Wang, 2018, I want it anyway: consumer perceptions of smart home devices, J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 60, 437
Wunderlich, 2019, Adoption of sustainable technologies: a mixed-methods study of German households, MIS Q., 43, 673, 10.25300/MISQ/2019/12112
Lupton, 2016, The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance, Econ. Soc., 45, 101, 10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726
Lee, 2017, Companionship with smart home devices: the impact of social connectedness and interaction types on perceived social support and companionship in smart homes, Comput. Hum. Behav., 922, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.031
O'Brolcháin, 2019, Privacy challenges in smart homes for people with dementia and people with intellectual disabilities, Ethics Inf. Technol., 21, 253, 10.1007/s10676-019-09507-0
Lee, 2016, Personalization–privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce, Comput. Hum. Behav., 63, 453, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.056
Jenness, 2007, Taking a look at surveillance studies, Contemp. Sociol., 36, 2, 10.1177/009430610603600201
van Heek, 2017, The surveillance society: which factors form public acceptance of surveillance technologies?, 170
Wirth, 2019, Justification of mass surveillance: a quantitative study, 1337
Spitzmüller, 2006, Examining employee compliance with organizational surveillance and monitoring, J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 79, 245, 10.1348/096317905X52607
Mani, 2019, Impact of privacy concerns on resistance to smart services: does the ‘Big brother effect’ matter?, J. Mark. Manag., 35, 1460, 10.1080/0267257X.2019.1667856
Pavlou, 2002, Institution-based trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: the role of online B2b marketplaces on trust formation, J. Strategic Inf. Syst., 11, 215, 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00017-3
Paluch, 2019, Persuaded self-tracking with wearable technology: carrot or stick, J. Services Mark., 33, 436, 10.1108/JSM-03-2018-0091
Wright, 2010, Sorting out smart surveillance, Comput. Law Security Rev., 26, 343, 10.1016/j.clsr.2010.05.007
Oulasvirta, 2012, Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home, 41
Lyon, 2014, Surveillance, snowden, and big data: capacities, consequences, critique, Big Data Soc., 1, 1, 10.1177/2053951714541861
Essen, 2008, The two facets of electronic care surveillance: an exploration of the views of older people who live with monitoring devices, Soc. Sci. Med., 67, 128, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.005
Sheng, 2008, An experimental study on ubiquitous commerce adoption: impact of personalization and privacy concerns, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 9, 344
Awad, 2006, The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization, MIS Q., 30, 13, 10.2307/25148715
Sutanto, 2013, Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: an empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users, MIS Q., 37, 1141, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.07
Lee, 2011, Personalisation–privacy paradox: the effects of personalisation and privacy assurance on customer responses to travel web sites, Tour. Manag., 32, 987, 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.011
Kehr, 2015, Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus, Inf. Syst. J., 25, 607, 10.1111/isj.12062
Utz, 2009, The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: the role of individual characteristics and group norms, Cyberpsychology, 3
Chen, 2019, Understanding consumers’ reactance of online personalized advertising: a new scheme of rational choice from a perspective of negative effects, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 53, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.001
Ham, 2016, Exploring how consumers cope with online behavioral advertising, Int. J. Advert., 36, 632, 10.1080/02650487.2016.1239878
Guo, 2016, The privacy–personalization paradox in mhealth services acceptance of different age groups, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 16, 55, 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.11.001
Zeng, 2021, Does self-disclosure matter? A dynamic two-stage perspective for the personalization-privacy paradox, J. Bus. Res., 124, 667, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.006
Hong, 2013, Internet privacy concerns: an integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies, MIS Q., 37, 275, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.12
Malhotra, 2004, Internet users' information privacy concerns (Iuipc): the construct, the scale, and a causal model, Inf. Syst. Res., 15, 336, 10.1287/isre.1040.0032
Smith, 1996, Information privacy: measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices, MIS Q., 20, 167, 10.2307/249477
Degirmenci, 2020, Mobile users’ information privacy concerns and the role of app permission requests, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 50, 261, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.010
Fan, 2020, Does role conflict influence discontinuous usage intentions? Privacy concerns, social media fatigue and self-esteem, Inf. Technol. People, 34, 1152, 10.1108/ITP-08-2019-0416
Kim, 2016, Web assurance seal services, trust and consumers’ concerns: an investigation of e-commerce transaction intentions across two nations, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 25, 252, 10.1057/ejis.2015.16
Kim, 2018, Factors influencing willingness to provide personal information for personalized recommendations, Comput. Hum. Behav., 143, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.031
Mousavi, 2020, Effectiveness of privacy assurance mechanisms in users' privacy protection on social networking sites from the perspective of protection motivation theory, Decis. Support Syst., 135, 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113323
Zalmanson, 2022, The role of social cues and trust in users' private information disclosure, MIS Q., 46, 1109, 10.25300/MISQ/2022/16288
Zhang, 2022, Peer privacy concerns: conceptualization and measurement, MIS Q., 10.25300/MISQ/2022/14861
Knote, 2019, Towards solving the personalization-privacy paradox for smart personal assistants
O'Brolchain, 2016, The convergence of virtual reality and social networks: threats to privacy and autonomy, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 22, 1, 10.1007/s11948-014-9621-1
Hong, 2014, A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research, Inf. Syst. Res., 25, 111, 10.1287/isre.2013.0501
Xu, 2009, The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 26, 135, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260305
Xu, 2012, Research note—effects of individual self-protection, industry self-regulation, and government regulation on privacy concerns: a study of location-based services, Inf. Syst. Res., 23, 1342, 10.1287/isre.1120.0416
Dezhi, 2003, A framework for classifying personalization scheme used on e-commerce websites, 12
Gursoy, 2019, Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (Ai) device use in service delivery, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 49, 157, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
Leino-Kilpi, 2001, Privacy: a review of the literature, Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 38, 663, 10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00111-5
Burgoon, 1982, Privacy and communication, Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc., 6, 206
Karwatzki, 2017, Beyond the personalization–privacy paradox: privacy valuation, transparency features, and service personalization, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 34, 369, 10.1080/07421222.2017.1334467
Aguirre, 2015, Unraveling the personalization paradox: the effect of information collection and trust-building strategies on online advertisement effectiveness, J. Retail., 91, 34, 10.1016/j.jretai.2014.09.005
Li, 2013, Compressed sensing signal and data acquisition in wireless sensor networks and internet of things, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 9, 2177, 10.1109/TII.2012.2189222
Haggerty, 2000, The surveillant assemblage, Br. J. Sociol., 51, 605, 10.1080/00071310020015280
Wang, 2019, Data fusion in cyber-physical-social systems: state-of-the-art and perspectives, Inf. Fusion, 42, 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.002
Hampapur, 2005, Smart video surveillance: exploring the concept of multiscale spatiotemporal tracking, IEEE Signal Process Mag., 22, 38, 10.1109/MSP.2005.1406476
Liang, 2014, Personalized content recommendation and user satisfaction: theoretical synthesis and empirical findings, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 23, 45, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230303
Junglas, 2006, The U-constructs: four information drives, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 17, 569
Featherman, 2003, Predicting E-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 59, 451, 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
Hsu, 2016, An empirical examination of consumer adoption of internet of things services: network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives, Comput. Hum. Behav., 62, 516, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.023
Zhang, 2019, Consumer experience and adoption intention of internet of things services: the impact of network externalities, J. Digit. Converg., 17, 177
Hong, 2020, What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services?, Telecomm. Policy, 44, 1, 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101867
McLean, 2019, Hey Alexa … Examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants, Comput. Hum. Behav., 28, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009
Davis, 2020, Five processes in the platformisation of cultural production: amazon and its publishing ecosystem, Aust. Hum. Rev., 66
Foltz, 2020, Mobile users’ information privacy concerns instrument and Iot, Inf. Comput. Security, 28, 359, 10.1108/ICS-07-2019-0090
Monteiro, 2019, Synthetic knowing: the politics of the internet of things, MIS Q., 43, 167, 10.25300/MISQ/2019/13799
Lichy, 2017, Big data is watching you: opportunities and challenges from the perspective of young adult consumers in Russia, J. Mark. Manag., 33, 719, 10.1080/0267257X.2017.1313301
Sharron, 2016, The internet of things—evaluating the interplay of interoperability, industry standards and related ip licensing approaches, Licens. J., 36, 8
Lin, 2016, The moderate role of perceived surveillance for value perception in solomo services continuance
Kim, 2019, Willingness to provide personal information: perspective of privacy calculus in Iot services, Comput. Hum. Behav., 92, 273, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.022
Lowry, 2018, Why security and privacy research lies at the centre of the information systems (is) artefact: proposing a bold research agenda, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 26, 546, 10.1057/s41303-017-0066-x
Solove, 2006, A taxonomy of privacy, Univ. PA. Law Rev., 154, 477, 10.2307/40041279
Guhr, 2020, Privacy concerns in the smart home context, SN Appl. Sci., 2, 1, 10.1007/s42452-020-2025-8
Crossler, 2019, Why Would I use location-protective settings on my smartphone? Motivating protective behaviors and the existence of the privacy knowledge–belief gap, Inf. Syst. Res., 30, 995, 10.1287/isre.2019.0846
Komninos, 2014, Survey in smart grid and smart home security: issues, challenges and countermeasures, IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutorials, 16, 1933, 10.1109/COMST.2014.2320093
Xu, 2011, Information privacy concerns: linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 12, 798
Chen, 2018, Does endowing a product with life make one feel more alive? The effect of product anthropomorphism on consumer vitality, J. Assoc. Consum. Res., 3, 503, 10.1086/698493
Aggarwal, 2011, When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism, J. Consum. Res., 39, 307, 10.1086/662614
Venkatesh, 2003, User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Q., 27, 425, 10.2307/30036540
Tsai, 2019, Acceptance and resistance of telehealth: the perspective of dual-factor concepts in technology adoption, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 49, 34, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.003
James, 2019, Using organismic integration theory to explore the associations between users' exercise motivations and fitness technology feature set use, MIS Q., 43, 287, 10.25300/MISQ/2019/14128
Hu, 2021, Can Ai artifacts influence human cognition? The effects of artificial autonomy in intelligent personal assistants, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 56, 1, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102250
Kummer, 2017, Technology-induced anxiety: manifestations, cultural influences, and its effect on the adoption of sensor-based technology in German and Australian hospitals, Inf. Manag., 54, 73, 10.1016/j.im.2016.04.002
Warkentin, 2017, Shared benefits and information privacy what determines smart meter technology adoption, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 18, 758
Armstrong, 1977, Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys, J. Mark. Res., 14, 396, 10.1177/002224377701400320
Liang, 2007, Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management, MIS Q., 31, 59, 10.2307/25148781
Lynn, 2012, Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based sem: an illustration and recommendations, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 13, 546
Lohmoller, 1988, The PLS program system: latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation, Multivariate Behav. Res., 23, 125, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_7
Becker, 2012, Hierarchical latent variable models in pls-sem: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models, Long Range Plann., 45, 359, 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
Hou, 2019, The involvement paradox: the role of cognitive absorption in mobile instant messaging user satisfaction, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 119, 881, 10.1108/IMDS-06-2018-0245
Zhang, 2020, How social-media-enabled co-creation between customers and the firm drives business value? The perspective of organizational learning and social capital, Inf. Manag., 57, 10.1016/j.im.2019.103200
Straub, 2004, Validation guidelines for is positivist research, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 13, 380
Chin, 1997, Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation, Inf. Syst. Res., 8, 342, 10.1287/isre.8.4.342
Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Mark. Res., 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104
Henseler, 2016, Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 116, 2, 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Chin, 2003, A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study, Inf. Syst. Res., 14, 189, 10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
Gerbing, 1984, On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors, J. Consum. Res., 11, 572, 10.1086/208993
Law, 1998, Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs, Acad. Manag. Rev., 23, 741, 10.2307/259060
Petter, 2007, Specifying formative constructs in information systems research, MIS Q., 31, 623, 10.2307/25148814
Xu, 2008, Combining empirical experimentation and modeling techniques: a design research approach for personalized mobile advertising applications, Decis. Support Syst., 44, 710, 10.1016/j.dss.2007.10.002
Bagozzi, 1982
Aiken, 1991
Hayes, 2013
Wang, 2021, Role stressors, job satisfaction, and employee creativity: the cross-level moderating role of social media use within teams, Inf. Manag., 58, 1, 10.1016/j.im.2020.103317
Edwards, 2007, Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis, Psychol. Methods, 12, 1, 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
Morosan, 2016, Modeling guests’ intentions to use mobile apps in hotels: the roles of personalization, privacy, and involvement, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., 28, 1968, 10.1108/IJCHM-07-2015-0349
Banks, 2021, Good robots, bad robots: morally valenced behavior effects on perceived mind, morality, and trust, Int. J. Soc. Robot., 2021, 10.1007/s12369-020-00692-3
Kim, 2019, Smart homes as product-service systems: two focal areas for developing competitive smart home appliances, Serv. Sci., 11, 292, 10.1287/serv.2019.0248
Kininmonth, 2018, Privacy concerns and acceptance of government surveillance in Australia
Galluccio, 2011, Context privacy in the internet of things, 61
Kolkowska, 2015, Privacy Dimensions in design of smart home systems for elderly people
Padyab, 2018, Exploring the dimensions of individual privacy concerns in relation to the internet of things use situations, Digit. Policy, Regul. Govern., 20, 528, 10.1108/DPRG-05-2018-0023