AI in Search of Unfairness in Consumer Contracts: The Terms of Service Landscape
Tóm tắt
This article explores the potential of artificial intelligence for identifying cases where digital vendors fail to comply with legal obligations, an endeavour that can generate insights about business practices. While heated regulatory debates about online platforms and AI are currently ongoing, we can look to existing horizontal norms, especially concerning the fairness of standard terms, which can serve as a benchmark against which to assess business-to-consumer practices in light of European Union law. We argue that such an assessment can to a certain extent be automated; we thus present an AI system for the automatic detection of unfair terms in business-to-consumer contracts, a system developed as part of the CLAUDETTE project. On the basis of the dataset prepared in this project, we lay out the landscape of contract terms used in different digital consumer markets and theorize their categories, with a focus on five categories of clauses concerning (i) the limitation of liability, (ii) unilateral changes to the contract and/or service, (iii) unilateral termination of the contract, (iv) content removal, and (v) arbitration. In so doing, the paper provides empirical support for the broader claim that AI systems for the automated analysis of textual documents can offer valuable insights into the practices of online vendors and can also provide valuable help in their legal qualification. We argue that the role of technology in protecting consumers in the digital economy is critical and not sufficiently reflected in EU legislative debates.
Tài liệu tham khảo
André, Q., Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., Crum, A., Frank, D., Goldstein, W., Huber, J., Boven, L., Weber, B., & Yang, H. (2018). Consumer choice and autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Customer Needs and Solutions, 5(1), 28–37.
Bakos, J. Y. (1997). Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676–1692.
Beale, H. (1989). Unfair contracts in Britain and Europe. Current Legal Problems 192, 42(1), 197–215.
BEUC. (2021). Regulating AI to protect the consumer. Position paper on the AI act. Tech rep. The European Consumer Organisation. https://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2021-088_regulating_ai_to_protect_the_consumer.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2022
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press.
Bradshaw, S., Millard, C., & Walden, I. (2011). Contracts for clouds: Comparison and analysis of the terms and conditions of cloud computing services. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(3), 187–223.
Contissa, G., Docter, K., Lagioia, F., Lippi, M., Micklitz, H.W., Palka, P., Sartor, G., & Torroni, P. (2018a). Automated processing of privacy policies under the EU general data protection regulation. In M. Palmirani (Ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems. (pp. 51-60). Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (313). IOS Press.
Contissa, G., Docter, K., Lagioia, F., Lippi, M., Micklitz, H.W., Pałka, P., Sartor, G., & Torroni, P. (2018b). Claudette meets GDPR: Automating the evaluation of privacy policies using artificial intelligence. Tech rep. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3208596. Accessed 15 July 2022
Curran, D. (2018). Where is all the consumer-facing legaltech? https://damiancurran.com/2018/10/21/where-is-all-the-consumer-facing-legaltech. Accessed 19 January 2022
Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2018). Learning in standard form contracts: Theory and evidence. NYU Law and Economics Research Paper (18-11).
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018). AI4people-an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.
Galbraith, J.K. (1993). American capitalism: The concept of countervailing power. Routledge
Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016. Pew Research Center. https://web.archive.org/web/20160910083105/http://www.journalism.org/files/2016/05/PJ_2016.05.26_social-media-and-news_FINAL-1.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2022
Grafanaki, S. (2016). Autonomy challenges in the age of big data. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 27, 803-863.
Hagey, K., & Horwitz, J. (2021). Facebook tried to make its platform a healthier place. It got angrier instead. The Wall Street Journal.
Helberger, N., Lynskey, O., Micklitz, H.W., Rott, P., Sax, M., & Strycharz, J. (2021). EU consumer protection 2.0: Structural asymmetries in digital consumer markets. Tech rep.
Helbing, D. (2019). Societal, economic, ethical and legal challenges of the digital revolution: From big data to deep learning, artificial intelligence, and manipulative technologies. In Towards digital enlightenment: Essays on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution (pp. 47–72). Springer.
Helmore, E. (2017, January 2). Facebook blocks photo of neptune statue for being “explicitly sexual”. The Guardian.
Hu, N., Koh, N. S., & Reddy, S. K. (2014). Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? The mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales. Decision support systems, 57, 42–53.
Iqbal, N. (2020, October 25). Instagram row over plus-size model forces change to nudity policy. The Guardian.
Jabłonowska, A., Kuziemski, M., Nowak, A.M., Micklitz, H.W., Pałka, P., & Sartor, G. (2018). Consumer law and artificial intelligence: Challenges to the EU consumer law and policy stemming from the business’ use of artificial intelligence-final report of the artsy project. EUI Department of Law Working Paper (2018/11).
Jabłonowska, A., Lagioia, F., Lippi, M., Micklitz, H.W., Sartor, G., & Tagiuri, G. (2021) Assessing the cross-market generalization capability of the claudette system. In Legal knowledge and information systems (pp. 62-67). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (Vol. 346). IOS Press.
Levin, S. (2016, September 9). Facebook backs down from “napalm girl” censorship and reinstates photo. The Guardian.
Lippi, M., Pałka, P., Contissa, G., Lagioia, F., Micklitz, H. W., Sartor, G., & Torroni, P. (2019). CLAUDETTE: An automated detector of potentially unfair clauses in online terms of service. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 27(2), 117–139.
Lippi, M., Contissa, G., Jablonowska, A., Lagioia, F., Micklitz, H. W., Palka, P., Sartor, G., & Torroni, P. (2020). The force awakens: Artificial intelligence for consumer law. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 67, 169–190.
Loos, M., & Luzak, J. (2016). Wanted: A bigger stick. On unfair terms in consumer contracts with online service providers. Journal of Consumer Policy, 39(1), 63–90.
Loos, M., Luzak, J. (2021). Update the unfair contract terms directive for digital services. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/676006/IPOL_STU(2021)676006_EN.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2022
Micklitz, H. W., Pałka, P., & Panagis, Y. (2017). The empire strikes back: Digital control of unfair terms of online services. Journal of Consumer Policy, 40(3), 367–388.
Mirsch, T., Lehrer, C., & Jung, R. (2017). Digital nudging: Altering user behavior in digital environments. Proceedings of the 13th Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017), 634–648.
Montagnani, M. L. (2019). A new liability regime for illegal content in the digital single market strategy. In F. Giancarlo, The Oxford handbook of online intermediary liability. Oxford University Press.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
Pałka, P., & Lippi, M. (2019). Big data analytics, online terms of service and privacy policies. In R. Vogl (Ed.) , Research handbook on big data law. Research handbooks in information law series (pp. 115–134).
Palka, P. J. (2017). Beyond contract law in the regulation of online platforms: Terms of service are not contracts. In S. Grundmann (Ed.), European contract law in the digital age. Interesentia.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society. Harvard University Press.
Ruggeri, F., Lagioia, F., Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2021). Detecting and explaining unfairness in consumer contracts through memory networks. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30, 59–92.
Ruggieri, S., Pedreschi, D., & Turini, F. (2010). Data mining for discrimination discovery. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 4(2), 1–40.
Schmitz, A. J. (2010). Drive-thru arbitration in the digital age: Empowering consumers through regulated ODR. Baylor Law Review, 62, 178–243.
Stone, Z. (2015, November 9). Living and dying on airbnb. Medium. https://medium.com/matter/living-and-dying-on-airbnb-6bff8d600c04. Accessed 15 July 2022
Ullrich, C. (2017). Standards for duty of care: Debating intermediary liability from a sectoral perspective. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 8(2), 111–127.
Wathieu, L., Brenner, L., Carmon, Z., Chattopadhyay, A., Wertenbroch, K., Drolet, A., Gourville, J., Muthukrishnan, A., Novemsky, N., Ratner, R. K., et al. (2002). Consumer control and empowerment: A primer. Marketing Letters, 13(3), 297–305.
Wauters, E., Lievens, E., & Valcke, P. (2014). Towards a better protection of social media users: A legal perspective on the terms of use of social networking sites. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 22(3), 254–294.
Willett, C. (2016).Fairness in consumer contracts: The case of unfair terms. Routledge
Willett, C. (2017). Fairness in Consumer Contracts: The Case of Unfair Terms. De Manifort University.
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75.
Wu, S. H., Chou, M. J., Tseng, C. H., Lee, Y. J., & Chen, K. T. (2015). Detecting in situ identity fraud on social network services: A case study with facebook. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(4), 2432–2443.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89.