AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Stern SH, Kaczmarek RV, Spelic DC, Suleiman OH.Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT) 2000–2001 survey of patient radiation exposure from computed tomographic (CT) examinations in the United States (abstr).Radiology2001; 221(P):161.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration. Whole body scanning using computed tomography (CT).Available at:http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/2002. Accessed April.
Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM.The essential physics of medical imaging2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
International Council on Radiation Protection.1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological ProtectionPublication 60, Annals of the ICRP 1991; 21. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1991.
International Council on Radiation Protection.Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1977Publication 26, Annals of the ICRP 1(3) (reprinted with additions in 1987). Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1977. [superseded by ICRP Publication 60].
American Association of Physicists in Medicine.Standardized methods for measuring diagnostic x-ray exposure.Report no. 31, 1990. Available at:www.aapm.org/pubs/reports
American Association of Physicists in Medicine.Specification and acceptance testing of computed tomography scanners.Report no. 39, 1993. Available at:www.aapm.org/pubs/reports
European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography (EUR 16262 EN, May 1999).Available at:www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm2002. Accessed July.
Rothenberg LN, Pentlow KS.CT dosimetry and radiation safety.In: Goldman LW, Fowlkes JB, eds.Syllabus: a categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics—CT and US cross-sectional imaging.Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2000; 171-188.
McCollough CM, Zink FE.Performance evaluation of CT systems.In: Goldman LW, Fowlkes JB, eds.Syllabus: a categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics—CT and US cross-sectional imaging.Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2000; 189-207.
Nagel HD, ed.Radiation exposure in computed tomography2nd ed. Hamburg, Germany: COCIR, 2000. [available [email protected]].
Jucius RA, Kambic GX.Radiation dosimetry in computed tomography.Appl Opt Instrum Eng Med1977; 127:286-295.
Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC.A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.Med Phys1991; 8:488-495.
Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration.21 CFR Part 1020: Diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components; amendments to performance standard; Final rule.Federal Register1984; 49:171.
Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al.Perspective: minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT—strategies at a large children’s hospital.AJR Am J Roentgenol2001; 176:304-306.
Rogalla P, Stöver B, Scheer I, Juran R, Gaedicke G, Hamm B.Low-dose spiral CT: applicability to paediatric chest imaging.Pediatr Radiol1998; 29:565-569.
Feigal DW.FDA Public Health Notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration.Available at:http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/110201-ct.html2001. Accessed November.
Gies M, Suess C, Wolf H, Kalender WA, Madsen MT.Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation.I. Simulation studies. Med Phys1999; 26:2235-2247.
Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Bautz WA.Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation.II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys1999; 26:2248-2253.
Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K.Survey of CT practice in the UKPart 2: Dosimetric aspects. NRPB R249. Chilton, England: National Radiological Protection Board, 1991.
Jones DG, Shrimpton PC.Survey of CT practice in the UKPart 3: Normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRPB R-250. Chilton, England: National Radiological Protection Board, 1992.
Jones DG, Shrimpton PC.Normalised organ doses for x-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniquesNRPB SR-250. Chilton, England: National Radiological Protection Board, 1992. [computer software report].
Shrimpton PC, Jones DG.Normalised organ doses for x-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques and a mathematical anthropomorphic phantom.Radiat Prot Dosimetry1993; 49:241-243.
Cristy M.Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal doseNUREG/CR-1159 ORNL/NUREG/TM-367. Oak Ridge, Tenn: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1980.
Imaging Performance Assessment of CT (ImPACT) CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator, version 0.99m. Created 07/01/2002.Available at:http://www.impactscan.org/ctdosimetry.htm
Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G.The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methodsPart VI: Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91. Neuherberg, Germany: Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung, 1991.
Kramer R, Zankl M, Williams G, Drexler G.The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methodsPart I: The male (Adam) and female (Eva) adult mathematical phantoms. GSF-Bericht S-885. Munich, Germany: Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung, 1982.
Beifuss U, McNitt-Gray MF, Cagnon CH, DeMarco JJ.Monte Carlo methods to simulate radiation dose from spiral computed tomography: phantom studies (abstr).Radiology2000; 217(P):488.
Jarry G, DeMarco JJ, McNitt-Gray MF.Monte Carlo dose verification of a commercial CT scanner with applications for patient specific dosimetry (abstr).Med Phys2002; 29:1344. [presented at the 2002 annual conference of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine].