A web analytics tool selection method: an analytical hierarchy process approach

Emerald - 2011
KazuoNakatani1, Ta‐TaoChuang2
1Lutgert College of Business, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida, USA
2School of Business Administration, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop an analytical hierarchy process (AHP)‐based selection model for choosing a web analytics product/service that meets organizational needs.Design/methodology/approachThe research objective is achieved through modeling and empirical validation.FindingsWhile more criteria could be added, the proposed selection model provides a feasible approach to choosing a web analytics product/service. Cost‐ and risk‐related criteria are weighed heavier than those of technical capabilities. Tools based on the page tagging method are more popular than those based on transaction log file analysis. The level of technology savvy might play a role in the application of the selection model.Research limitations/implicationsThe development of web analytics products/service is still evolving. Thus, as the use of web analytics increases, more criteria might be identified and added to the model. The model is validated by groups for different sectors. In the future, it is suggested to conduct a similar study with one sector by different groups.Practical implicationsThe selection model provides a process in which practitioners can systematically evaluate pros and cons of web analytics products/services. The selection model includes a comprehensive list of criteria that vendors of web analytics products/services can use to benchmark their products. Following this model, an organization contemplating the use of web analytics will more likely find one product/service that accommodates organizational and technological characteristics.Originality/valueA sufficiently comprehensive list of qualitative and quantitative criteria for evaluating web analytics products/services was developed. Practitioners will be able to use the model to select a proper tool. In academia, the article fills a gap in literature that might bring academics' interests in this area.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Castledine, S. and Kogan, S. (2009), “After blogging: who's reading your blog, and why?”, available at: www.stevecastledine.com (accessed May 5, 2010).

Davenport, T., Cohen, D. and Jacobson, A. (2005), Competing on Analytics, Working Knowledge Research Report, Babson Executive Education, Babson Park, MA.

Enge, E. (2007), “2007 web analytics shootout – final report”, available at: www.stonetemple.com/articles/analytics‐report‐august‐2007.shtml (accessed March 31, 2010).

Gassman, B. (2009), “Key challenges in web analytics, 2009”, Gartner Group, available at: www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=169145 (accessed January 11, 2010).

Insightr Consulting (2009), “Insightr InSite: comparing free analytics (visual)”, available at: www.slideshare.net/insightr/insightr‐insite‐comparing‐free‐analytics‐visual (accessed March 31, 2010).

Kaushik, A. (2007), “Web analytics tools comparison: a recommendation”, available at: www.kaushik.net/avinash/2007/04/web‐analytics‐tools‐comparison‐a‐recommendation.html (accessed March 31, 2010).

Lai, V.S., Trueblood, R.P. and Wong, B.K. (1999), “Software selection: a case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system”, Information & Management, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 221‐32.

Lai, V.S., Wong, B.K. and Cheung, W. (2002), “Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: a case using the AHP in software selection”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 137 No. 1, pp. 134‐44.

Lovett, J., Doty, C.A. and Murphy, E. (2009), “The Forrester Wave™: web analytics, Q3 2009”, available at: http://sembuilders.com.ar/wp‐content/themes/sembuilders/pdf/forrester_web%20analytics.pdf (accessed March 31, 2010).

Martinez, M. (2006), “How reliable is Google Analytics?”, available at: www.seomoz.org/blog/how‐reliable‐is‐google‐analytics (accessed December 17, 2009).

Roper‐Lowe, G.C. and Sharp, J.A. (1990), “The analytical hierarchy process and its application to an information technology decision”, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 49‐59.

Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (1994), Decision Making in Economic, Political, Social and Technological Environments with Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.

Sutterfield, J.S., Swirsky, S. and Ngassam, C. (2008), “Project management software selection using analytical hierarchy process”, Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 79‐93.

Waisberg, D. and Kaushik, A. (2009), “Web Analytics 2.0: empowering customer centricity”, Web Analytics 2.0: empowering customer centricity. SEM.org Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, available at: www.semj.org/documents/webanalytics2.0_SEMJvol2.pdf (accessed May 15, 2009).

Yahoo! Inc. (2009), “Yahoo! Web Analytics delivers powerful, flexible, real‐time site analytics to Yahoo! customers. And it's free”, available at: http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/webanalytics/pdf/yahoo_web_analytics_overview.pdf (accessed March 31, 2010).

Maiden, N.A. and Ncube, C. (1998), “Acquiring COTS software selection requirements”, IEEE Software, Vol. 15 2, March/April, pp. 46‐56.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả