A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
McKibbon K. A., 1998, Evidence‐based practice., Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86, 396
Cochrane A. L., 1979, Medicines for the Year 2000, 1
Lind J.A Treatise of the Scurvy. In three parts containing an inquiry into the nature causes and cure of that disease. Together with a critical and chronological view of what has been published on the subject.1753a. Available from:http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/trial_records/17th_18th_Century/lind/lind‐experiment.pdf(accessed 10 March 2009).
Lind J.A Treatise of the Scurvy. In three parts containing an inquiry into the nature causes and cure of that disease. Together with a critical and chronological view of what has been published on the subject.1753b. Available from:http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/trial_records/17th_18th_Century/lind/lind‐experiment.pdf(accessed 10 March 2009).
Alonso P. G., 1968, Conservation and circulation in map libraries: a brief review, Geography and Map Division Bulletin, 74, 15
Oxford English Dictionary.Oxford English Dictionary.2008. Available from:http://dictionary.oed.com/(accessed 4 March 2009).
Ankem K., 2008, Evaluation of method in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in LIS, Library and Information Research, 32, 91, 10.29173/lirg58
Walton G., 2006, Health Information and Libraries Journal: Strategy for 2007–2010
Ankem K., 2006, Use of information sources by cancer patients: results of a systematic review of the research literature, Information Research, 11
Beverley C. A., 2003, Clinical librarianship: a systematic review of the literature, Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20, 10
Wagner K. C., 2004, Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical medical librarian programs: a systematic review of the literature, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92, 14
Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA).Principles for the Organization of the Transportation Research Thesaurus. Available from:http://ntl.bts.gov/tools/trt/trt_principles.html(accessed 9 March 2009).
Miles M. B., 1984, Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods
National Center for Biotechnology Information.Review Literature as Topic.2005. Available from:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=mesh&dopt=Full&list_uids=68012196(accessed 4 March 2009).
EPPI‐Centre.Descriptive Mapping.2006. Available from:http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=175&language=en‐US(accessed 4 March 2009).
Subject Centre for Information and Computer Sciences Outputs—meta‐analysis meta‐synthesis and guidelines.2007. Available from:http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/rlos/systematic_review/Unit4_systematic_review/page_01.htm(accessed 4 March 2009).
Oliver S. Harden A. Rees R. Shepherd J. Brunton G. Garcia J.&Oakley A.An emerging framework for integrating different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy.Evaluation & the Health Professions2005 11 428–66.
Oxman A. D. Cook D. J.&Guyatt G. H.How to use an Overview.1994. Available from:http://www.cche.net/usersguides/overview.asp(accessed 4 March 2009).
Booth A., 2006, Brimful of STARLITE: toward standards for reporting literature searches, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94, 421
Mulrow C. D.&Cook D. J.Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions. Philadelphia PA:American College of Physicians 1998.
Booth A.The neglected voice: is there a role for qualitative systematic reviews in EBLIP?Transforming the profession through evidence‐based library and information fractice.Evidence‐Based Library and Information Practice 4th International Conference 6–11 May 2007.2007. Available from:http://eblip4.unc.edu/program.html(accessed 4 March 2009).
Noyes J.et al.Chapter 20: Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.0.1. September 2008. Available from:http://www.cochrane‐handbook.org(accessed 4 March 2009).
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care.2009. Available from: 332005 http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm(accessed 4 March 2009).
Government Social Research.REA Toolkit: Rapid Evidence Assessment Toolkit Index.2008. Available from:http://www.gsr.gov.uk/professional_guidance/rea_toolkit/(accessed 11 March 2009).
Butler G. Deaton S. Hodgkinson J. Holmes E.&Marshall S.Quick but not Dirty: Rapid Evidence Assessments as a Decision Support Tool in Social Policy.2005. Available from:http://www.gsr.gov.uk/downloads/new_research/archive//quick_not_dirty05.pdf(accessed 4 March 2009).
National Library of Medicine.Medical Subject Headings. Publication Characteristics (Publication Types): Scope Notes.2005. Available from:http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/pubtypes2006.html(accessed 4 March 2009).
Higgins J. P. T.&Green S.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.0.1 (updated September 2008).2008. Available from:http://www.cochrane‐handbook.org(accessed 4 March 2009).
Maden M., 2008, Impact and Influence: Evolving to Succeed
Public Health Resource Unit.Ten Questions to Help you Make Sense of Reviews.2006. Available from:http://www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Links/S.Reviews%20Appraisal%20Tool.pdf(accessed 4 March 2009).
Medical Library Association.Medical Library Association Policy Statement: Role of Expert Searching in Health Sciences Libraries.2007. Available from:http://www.mlanet.org/resources/expert_search/policy_expert_search.html(accessed 4 March 2009).
Harris M. R., 1993, The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93, 81
Grant M. J., 2008, Impact and Influence: Evolving to Succeed. HLG Conference